ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Safety at heights?
by gfretwell - 04/23/24 03:03 PM
Old low volt E10 sockets - supplier or alternative
by gfretwell - 04/21/24 11:20 AM
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 04/06/24 08:32 PM
UL 508A SPACING
by tortuga - 03/30/24 07:39 PM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
1 members (Scott35), 216 guests, and 11 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,931
Likes: 34
G
Member
That is true mike and we do it all the time (isolated secondaries). Look at the transformer for a pool light where safety is job #1. It is isolated from ground.


Greg Fretwell
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,520
P
Member
It comes down to what that transformer is being used for. On a service bench, we'll use a 1:1 isolation xfmr with the secondary floating simply to remove the ground reference from the radio/TV being worked on. It reduces risk of shock due to accidental contact and permits grounded test equipment to be connected to "live chassis" apparatus for testing and alignment.

Look at the British bathroom shaver outlet for a similar 1:1 xfmr example. The secondary is left deliberately ungrounded to reduce possible shock risk. They key here is that the xfmr is right at the outlet itself, thus resulting in a short and easily controllable section of ungrounded circuit, just as with test bench example.

If you use those ungrounded secondaries to feed into much more extensive building wiring, capacitive effects at 50/60Hz will start to become much more apparent. Grab hold of just one side of a U.K. shaver outlet and you won't feel much (if anything). Do that with a wiring system running over a much larger area and the stray capacitance could be enough to deliver a significant punch.

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 599
J
JBD Offline
Member
Originally Posted by Gmack
Yes JBD, I agree , no deal breaker. But.

Not something to be taken farther than control Xfrmr. Yes?


Actually no.

I would almost never recommend it for a control transformer, but I have very few reservations about doing it with a large power transfromer. The control transfromer will probably have lousy voltage regulation. But I always check with the transformer manufacturer first.

Joined: May 2006
Posts: 29
G
Junior Member
JBD, you are sounding as if you are on another topic, to me anyway.

The code allows little in regards to isolation transformers, they shall not have grounded secondaries.

You could ground a control xfmr but there are many applications were it would be better to not do so.

Your postion here is not consistent with standard prevention of hazards

517.160 Isolated Power Systems

Also in regards to control xfmr's, there are a boat load of reasons to NOT ground control xfmr's in obvious industrial applications.


Ive wired operating rooms were "isolation" from ground by secondaries is a "shall" issue by all equipment and installation and code.

Furthermore you stated that you must ground all xfmr;s as per 250. I dont agree with that as spec'd above

There is a place in the electrical contruction idustry and elsewhere, ARTICLE 517 Health Care Facilities for not grounding xfrm's secondaries.

This OP was about back feeding a xfmr and evolved to grounding line on the secondary of said back fed xfrm.

JBD, can you elaborate on why you have no problem doing this on large xfmr's and your reasons why NOT to do it on control and isolation xfmr's as the NEC clearly requires.

In my tours of duty in industrial maintenance we requently "floated" the neutral on control xfmr's. It was backed up by the "engineering" staff,. And the NEC.

.

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 599
J
JBD Offline
Member
Originally Posted by JBD
Originally Posted by Gmack
Yes JBD, I agree , no deal breaker. But.

Not something to be taken farther than control Xfrmr. Yes?


Actually no.

I would almost never recommend it for a control transformer, but I have very few reservations about doing it with a large power transfromer. The control transfromer will probably have lousy voltage regulation. But I always check with the transformer manufacturer first.


I guess I am, sorry.
I was talking about not reversing connecting control transfromer, I didn't realize we had switched to ground/bond versus float.

Always ground transformer secondaries per 250. I cannot think of any good general reason to float a secondary.

Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 599
J
JBD Offline
Member
Originally Posted by Trumpy
Originally Posted by JBD

An isolation transformer is a separately derived system and must be grounded per article 250. It makes no difference if there is a grounded conductor on both the transformer primary and secondary, you must follow correct grounding and bonding practices.


But wouldn't having an isolating transformer with both of the windings grounded be a waste of time, considering that the ground connection would be common to both windings?.
I was always under the impression that a double wound transformer was made so that there would be no reference to the primary winding by the secondary winding, hence the term isolating transformer.


Trumpy,

This happens often for example, a 277V primary and a grounded 120V secondary in a lighting control panel or a 120V primary down to a 24V secondary in a furnce system.

Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 20
M
MMK Offline OP
Member
Hi All,
I want to thank everyone for their input on this topic.
One last question:
Does it break any US electrical wiring codes to use a transformer wrong way round, i.e. line connected to primary?

TiA,
Michael.

Joined: May 2005
Posts: 984
Likes: 1
G
Member
The line is always connected to the primary. In general the primary is the high voltage winding, but there are no Code issues with treating the low voltage winding as the primary.

You'll get crummy voltage regulation and various other potential issues, but no Code problems.


Ghost307
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,931
Likes: 34
G
Member
The distribution system uses step up transformers at the source end so they must be able to handle the voltage regulations problems.


Greg Fretwell
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 599
J
JBD Offline
Member
Originally Posted by gfretwell
The distribution system uses step up transformers at the source end so they must be able to handle the voltage regulations problems.


The voltage regulation issue only occurs when a transformer is reverse connected.

Page 3 of 4 1 2 3 4

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5