ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
2023 CEU Course
by renosteinke - 07/12/24 03:26 PM
Counterfeit Code Books?
by Comprehensiveedu - 07/12/24 12:16 PM
Old low volt E10 sockets - supplier or alternative
by gfretwell - 07/11/24 08:51 PM
1&2 family services
by gfretwell - 07/11/24 08:33 PM
Safety at heights?
by gfretwell - 07/10/24 09:23 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 235 guests, and 22 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#170486 11/04/07 11:14 AM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4
D
drkana Offline OP
New Member
what size wire in paralell is equal to 300 mcm and is there a reference table somwhere?

Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep
2023 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
 

drkana #170491 11/04/07 12:57 PM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,716
R
Member
See Table 8 in Chapter 9

Roger

drkana #170515 11/04/07 10:29 PM
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 4
D
drkana Offline OP
New Member
looking at that table it looks like 3/0 or 2/0 but i'm not sure any suggestions.

drkana #170564 11/05/07 10:22 PM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
R
Member
What are you trying to do?
Don


Don(resqcapt19)
resqcapt19 #170567 11/06/07 07:22 AM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,716
R
Member
2/0 won't make it but, I think Don's question needs to be answered, it may save you some grief.

Roger

Roger #170615 11/07/07 08:30 AM
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,213
S
Member
With alternating current, magnetic fields build up inside the cable and skin resistance comes into play, so cable ampacity doesn't scale linearly with cross-section. In addition, cooling is related to the surface area of the cable, and larger cables have less surface area than two smaller ones to dissipate heat. Ergo, you can safely (and legally) carry more current through 2x 150MCM than through 1x 300MCM, and 2x 1/0 may be sufficient depending on what you intend.

If you're talking DC, reference Chapter 9, Table 8. If you're talking 60Hz AC, reference a combination of 310.60 with the derating rules of 310.1(B)(2)(a)... and the myraid of other codes that may apply.

Last edited by SteveFehr; 11/07/07 08:33 AM.
SteveFehr #171088 11/19/07 03:50 PM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 751
E
Member
Table 310.16 takes all of this into consideration. Assuming THWN insulated copper conductors, 300 kcmil has an ampacity of 285 amps, therefore 2 paralleled 1/0 AWG conductors in separate conduit or cable would have equivalent current carrying capacity. It is necessary to keep these paralleled conductors in separate conduit or cables because of the heat buildup when more than 3 current carrying conductors are installed in one conduit (300.15(B)(2)(a))


Earl

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5