ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 04/06/24 08:32 PM
UL 508A SPACING
by tortuga - 03/30/24 07:39 PM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
Portable generator question
by Steve Miller - 03/19/24 08:50 PM
240V only in a home and NEC?
by dsk - 03/19/24 06:33 AM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 96 guests, and 10 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,928
Likes: 34
G
Member
Originally Posted by acetoday
renosteinke,

What confuses me about this issue is if you can only fill a panel with 42 circuits then why do they make panelboards with greater then 42 circuits?


Canada does not have that rule,


Greg Fretwell
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,445
Likes: 3
Cat Servant
Member
The 42 circuit limitation applies only to 'appliance' panels .... that is, panels whose circuits have neutral wires. That's what the 10% rule defines. Other panels are "power" panels.

As mentioned above, this arbitrary rule is about to leave us.

Also as mentioned above, 'legal' and 'good design' are not always the same thing. Personally, I will even go so far as to assert that a design that is deliberately intended to 'push the code' envelope is a bad design for every other purpose.

Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 186
N
Member
imo i would go with the MDP, i had this happen about 1 1/2 years ago to me on a job. I landed up going with a mdp in the basement and several panels though out the building. i would say cost can be slightly high or if you look at the fact of home run lengths slightly lower depending on your situation. Either way i feel this is a neater and much safer install for the homeowner. They are tought in an emergency go to the mdp and kill it one panel at a time then the main! Not the best of practices but it works rather then them running around a house trying to kill each little panel when they don't even know which one is causing the problem. i did mine this way and the inspector praised my design and install!!!

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,498
T
Member
Here (Austria) the planning standards say you can only fill new panels to 80% to leave room for future expansions. IMHO a good idea (even though I don't always stick to it when doing work in my own home).

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 202
3
Member
I'm a big believer in fitting the "next size up" board to alllow for expansion.

Case in point: with the low cost of split system airconditioners, it is quite easy to fill up a board with just one service call which then fils any spare poles in the board, some houses I have worked on have ended up with a sub-board being fitted just for split aircons & 15 amp welder/caravan outlets while the hot water service, cooking appliances, power & light circuits fill the original boards.

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5