ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Increasing demand factors in residential
by gfretwell - 03/28/24 12:43 AM
Portable generator question
by Steve Miller - 03/19/24 08:50 PM
Do we need grounding?
by NORCAL - 03/19/24 05:11 PM
240V only in a home and NEC?
by dsk - 03/19/24 06:33 AM
Cordless Tools: The Obvious Question
by renosteinke - 03/14/24 08:05 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 255 guests, and 16 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#167803 08/20/07 07:41 PM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 174
K
kale Offline OP
Member
Article 406.8 requires in-use covers for receptacles. Does this also apply to flanged-inlets, such as those used for generator connections?

Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep
2023 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
 

kale #167804 08/20/07 09:22 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,445
Likes: 2
Cat Servant
Member
I would say "no," based upon two reasons:

The first is that an 'inlet' is an inlet, not a receptacle.

The second is that inlets, by their very design, can't help but be rain-resistant. Indeed, I can't think of seeing any that would not, IMO, pass any standard 'rain test.'

renosteinke #167810 08/20/07 10:42 PM
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,507
G
Member
Reno- I guess I agree with your answer but I think this would be worthy of a code change. The wording does say receptacle and an inlet is not a receptacle but the same concerns are there as to water and shock hazard IMHO. If I were installing this at my own home I wold use an inuse cover. As an Inspector I'd have to approve it without an inuse cover.


George Little
George Little #167811 08/20/07 10:51 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,445
Likes: 2
Cat Servant
Member
George, the reason I speculate that inlets wold pass a rain test is because they tend to be set back from the face; that is, the plug is virtually 'inside' the wall ... sort of like what Arlington tries to do with it's "In Box." I speculate that adding a bubble cover might not inprove wet weather performance one bit.


Of point: Didn't the mention of 'inlet' and 'generator' in the same post scare you? I know - based on some real hack work - the idea scares me! laugh

renosteinke #167824 08/21/07 07:11 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
I
Moderator
Originally Posted by renosteinke
I speculate that adding a bubble cover might not inprove wet weather performance one bit.


Must be because you live in the desert. wink

Of course a cover would keep it dryer then no cover. I have never seen an 'inlet' that was so recessed that the cord connector was inside.

But I do agree that the NEC does not require it.



Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts
iwire #167837 08/21/07 11:56 AM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 174
K
kale Offline OP
Member
Reno, not to worry, this is not a suicide cord, but is used in conjunction with a transfer switch.

http://www.reliancecontrols.com/ProductDetail.aspx?PB30

kale #167841 08/21/07 12:48 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,923
Likes: 32
G
Member
IMHO in use covers are a great idea that got negated by the realities of manufacturing and hitting a price point. They are not really that effective.
Most I see that are actually used very often are either inproperly closed, incapable of being closed over the big plug caps on commercial cords or simply broken off.
I have in use covers on receptacles where I leave things plugged in all the time like my boat lift but I don't have them on receptacles that will be "attended" use. The old code actually had it right in my opinion. The snap cover does a whole lot better job in keeping water out of a receptacle when it is not in use. They are also not the natural home for wasps that an in use cover is.
The fact remains that outside electrical connections are "wet locations" and that crumby little cover does not change that.


Greg Fretwell
gfretwell #167842 08/21/07 01:36 PM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
I
Moderator
Greg I can't disagree with any of that, the thought was good, the execution has been poor.

One exception in my mind are the recessed type like Reno mentioned.

I have taken time to order more expensive Crouse Hinds die cast in use covers, sometimes the biggest they made and they still would not close on the heavy duty cords that where needed at that location.

Given time maybe they will get it better, but I would not hold my breath waiting for 'Bee resistant' covers....I don't think the CMP cares much about bees. wink



Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts
iwire #167861 08/21/07 09:05 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,445
Likes: 2
Cat Servant
Member
Just a small, trivial detail ....

When equipment 1s teated for use in "wet" locations, a 'rain test' is performed.

While there are several such industry-wide tests, they differ in detail and language only, and effect essentially the same conditions.

Water enters a pan. In the pan are holes. Into the holes are placed nails. This results in the water forming drops, that fall with the force of gravity.
A fan is used to angle the 'rain' approximately 15 degrees from the vertical.
The samples are tested ... exposed to the 'rain' for the required time .... then opened up, and checked for 'excessive' water entry.
Depending upon the equipment, actual operation may not be required.

Because of this "15 degree" rain, nearly anything set back at all, or angled down in the slightest, is almost a slam-dunk to pass the test.

This is not to be confused with other tests that may employ hoses, or greater angles.

renosteinke #167878 08/21/07 11:28 PM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,923
Likes: 32
G
Member
I guess that is a reasonable test if the wind never blows while it is raining. My experience is, that is not always true. I thought that might only be a Florida problem but I got caught in a little squall in South Dakota a couple weeks ago that was as nasty as our storms, (wind and water) just no lightning to speak of.
To the semi-trained eye I would say it was gusting 50 or so, dropped a half inch of rain in about 15 minutes and pea sized hail.


Greg Fretwell
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5