ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 04/06/24 08:32 PM
UL 508A SPACING
by tortuga - 03/30/24 07:39 PM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
Portable generator question
by Steve Miller - 03/19/24 08:50 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
1 members (Scott35), 177 guests, and 14 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 43
W
Junior Member
I cant find anything about the 50 foot rule you mentioned for HV generators?

Is it in there?

thanks,

Windmiller


We all live under one King
Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep
2023 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
 

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,928
Likes: 34
G
Member
I am still not sure how you get past 445.12


Greg Fretwell
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 43
W
Junior Member
Greg,
I am interested to know which part of 455.12?

I have 3 13.8 generators onsite and they come from the load side of the generator breaker control to a buss way over 50 feet away. No protection except at the gen brkr.

Thanks

Windmiller

Last edited by windmiller; 08/19/07 02:22 PM. Reason: correction

We all live under one King
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,507
G
Member
I think somehow they are trying to tie in 700.12(B)(6) to this application. I'm not sure it applies because the voltage isn't specified and the graphic in the code analysis from IAEI for the '02 code kinda would make one think it would be correct. What do you think Upper?


George Little
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 849
Y
Member
I feel 240.21 protecting conductors at the source applys unless one of the exeptions is met.Wheither its under 600volts or Medium Voltage .

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,507
G
Member
I can't agree with you Yooper, because of what it says in the scope of 240. It is clear that your code reference in Part II only applies to less than 600v. and since the question deals with over 600v.- then Part IX applies and there is nothing in Part IX that would prevent a remote disconnect as long as the overcurrent was properly sized. The EAB was wrong.


George Little
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 849
Y
Member
George
Correction Article 240.100 Still requires Protection Via Overcurrent relays or CT"s ,Fuses ,or some type of protective device. So they would have to protect generator conductors that go from generator to switchgear.240.100 A-B-C. alternate location in the circuit.But still In the circuit.Key word is IN.

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,507
G
Member
Ernie- I agree with you on the need for protection as called out in Part IX but my point was that 240.21 does not apply. When this issue came up I couldn't hear what some of the finer details were as I was seated near the rear of the room and the acoustics suck in that room plus some of the speaker didn't have very strong voices. I'm somewhat hearing challenged also so that don't help. It wasn't until I read it here that I realized that we are talking over 600v. Keep up the good work on that Board they need a strong code guy such as yourself. See Ya in December.


George Little
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 849
Y
Member
I was wrong when I quoted 240.21 Before George. you keep me on my toes! and at my age that ain't easy. you get my message about 2008 code book?

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,507
G
Member
Yep- I responded (I think) It's in the works.


George Little
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5