ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

>> Home   >> Electrical-Photos   >> Classifieds   >> Subscribe to Newsletter   >> Store  
 

Advertisement:-Left
Recent Gallery Topics:
What in Tarnation?
What in Tarnation?
by timmp, September 10
Plumber meets Electrician
Plumber meets Electrician
by timmp, September 10
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 646 guests, and 49 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 11
F
frankgi Offline OP
Member
A very knowledgeable co worker of mine claims to have failed a rough inspection because of an MC connector being used in a box that is to be concealed in a wall. I believe it is a JHA vio. Any thoughts?


"Its all about the small details"
Horizontal Ad
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,716
R
Member
I would say there is a misunderstanding somewhere in the translation of the story, or a misinformed inspector.

Roger

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,026
Likes: 37
G
Member
Is he saying the connector is concealed or the whole box(cover not accessible).


Greg Fretwell
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 11
F
frankgi Offline OP
Member
Thanks Roger and Greg for your replies.
It was a plain old side bracketed deep 1900 box with 9 ko's (3 on 3 sides with no internal clamp)used as a switch location (mud ring added) NEC 2005 Art 330 does not mention any vio about MC connectors in walls or concealed locations.


"Its all about the small details"
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,476
Likes: 3
Cat Servant
Member
I have heard folks claim that 90-degree MC, or flex, fittings had to be treated as an LB would be treated, and remain accessible.

Personally, I do not share this opinion. I do concede that some such fittings have little covers that make them resemble conduit bodies, but I still do not consider them to be the same as conduit bodies.

As for straight connectors .... I'm not sure it's possible to use them without concealing them. The NEC clearly allows for fishing the material ... and it's been quite a while since I saw a box with internal clamps.

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
I
Moderator
I think it is confusion with the requirement that 90 degree FMC connectors stay accessible.


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,026
Likes: 37
G
Member
The only reason conduit bodies need to remain accessible is so you can pull in new conductors after the walls are closed up. You don't pull new conductors in a cable.


Greg Fretwell
Horizontal Ad
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 11
F
frankgi Offline OP
Member
True Greg...or no one is going to make a splice in an MC 90 connector...imagine that!
Thanks for all the replies!


"Its all about the small details"

Link Copied to Clipboard
Featured:

 Electrical
 Clearance

 *
 Tools
 *

 Books

 *

 Test Equipment

 

Advertisement:-Right
Member Spotlight
Lostazhell
Lostazhell
Bakersfield, CA (Originally Orange Co.)
Posts: 1,440
Joined: February 2004
Top Posters(30 Days)
dsk 1
Popular Topics(Views)
553,292 Are you busy
427,835 Re: Forum
398,184 Need opinion
New Page 2
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5