0 members (),
101
guests, and
26
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,685 Likes: 4
OP
Administrator Member
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 827 Likes: 1
Member
|
Wouldn't you be better off driving them at an angle to miss the bedrock? I doubt that the copper in the bedrock is helping that much. Joe
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,876
Member
|
You might not be able to tell from the picture but it's tight area between two/three foundations and a retaining wall. Kind of boxed in a small area. 45 would be hard to keep the distance between them. But the rock is no more or less conductive than the soil, probhably more so. This stuff being serpentine, most of it is ancient compacted soil anyway.
Either way going at 45 degrees can also lead to the same problem very often. Once drove ten rods to get two of them down once. Ended up with 8 steel stubs to cut off.
Mark Heller "Well - I oughta....." -Jackie Gleason
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 745
Member
|
Sounds like a job for the 32 teeth per inch ground rod driver.
Seriously, would a two foot deep trench be out of the question for the rod to be placed horizontally?
---Ed---
"But the guy at Home Depot said it would work."
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,876
Member
|
32 teeth per inch? Hack/band saw? Not my style...
Concrete patio all around house on a hill with stair access. Demo hammer much easier to carry up than a ditch witch. I got two pavers up, drilled the concrete mortar and got the 2 rods below it. (2>6' apart, a single rod would require testing - two do not) Trenches (2x8'x30" deep) would be much more work/time, and a fill inspection.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 745
Member
|
I was just joking about the hacksaw!
---Ed---
"But the guy at Home Depot said it would work."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 8
Junior Member
|
I cringe when I come across this problem. Quite a few years ago I was doing some apartments, wouldn't you know it, the rod stopped and I didn't. I knew I just had a little way to go....Then the water started coming out of the ground. Every time I drive a rod it brings back memories of buried water pipes that nobody knew anything about.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 288
Member
|
Around here, we aren't even allowed to use rods anymore. West of I-35, odds are you can't drive it no matter how hard you try, and east of I-35, you can drive it, but in the summer when the soil dries up, the clay will shrink and there will be an air gap around the rod.
For new construction, we have to do a u-fer. For upgrades (90% of my work), we have to use a plate electrode. We automatically rent a chipping hammer, whether we need it or not.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,876
Member
|
Here we have to a ufer if there is 20' of foundation or grade beam being reworked.
Mark Heller "Well - I oughta....." -Jackie Gleason
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,520
Member
|
Over here, 4 ft. rods are pretty much the norm now, but then they're only used in combination with a main GFI, so very low ground impedance is not that much of an issue.
Where I am right on the coast much of the soil is so sandy that I can drive a 4 ft. rod into the ground with just my bare hands.
|
|
|
Posts: 8,443
Joined: July 2002
|
|
|
|