ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 04/06/24 08:32 PM
UL 508A SPACING
by tortuga - 03/30/24 07:39 PM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
1 members (Scott35), 466 guests, and 10 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,723
Likes: 1
Broom Pusher and
Member
E57;

Quote

What is that measurement to? Top, bottom, CL?

The quoted Maximum / Minimum dimension (measure) is to the Center of the "Activating Handle Of The Device" (Center of the throw of a Switch), or to the "Center of The Insertion Point Of The Device" (Center of either a Simplex [single] Receptacle, or the Center Point between the upper and lower halves of a Duplex Receptacle... AKA: right where the Cover Plate Screw goes on Standard "Double-D" Duplex Receptacles).

I have seen it (the "Measured Point for Electrical Devices), described as to the Center, in nearly all Spec's, plus in the documents referenced within the 2001 CEC, and in some ADA information from certain Jurisdictions (City / County of LA, for instance, has code compliance Documents On-Line).

For the norm of Outlets, figure minimum Center Line for "Floor Level Access Devices" - such as G.P. Receptacles and Comm/Data Outlets, to be 15" Minimum.
I usually go with an easier to install 18" center line - resulting in the Bottom of a typical 4s Box mounted at 16" (cut a 16" piece of Steel Stud for mounting aid).

On the flip side, for typical Light Switches, or when Receptacles are mounted at Switch Height, the Maximum Center Line dimension / measure is 48" (normally..., although exceptions do exist here! Some AHJs have height revisions for Receptacles and Switches in ADA Accessable Restrooms).
When I mount these Animals - again using the typical 4s Box as example, I go with 48" as the top of the Box - making the Center Line at 46", and the Bottom of the Box at 44".
Cut another Steel Stud 44" long for this mounting aid.

I will cut/paste text from some LADBS ADA documents I have - which are .PDFs, so the references need to be converted to either ASCII text or an image prior to posting here.

Scott35


Scott " 35 " Thompson
Just Say NO To Green Eggs And Ham!
Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep
2023 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
 

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 167
S
Member
HI to pwood,
I don't know why I put down ICC, you're right CA is on the 2001CBC ('97UBC)

Hi Scott35
Where are you quoting from? I don't disagree with the measurement, but my book (2001 CEC) has it a little different.
".....the center of the grip of the operating handle of controls or switches intended to be used....."
So putting the switch box at 48" AFF to top is always a safe bet. Beware on T-STATS as the controls may be on top, but it's rare.

The receptacles height as stated in the CEC has been the subject of some debate that I don't agree with. QUOTE:
"...the center of receptacle outlets on branch circuits 30 amperes or less shall be installed not more than 48 inches nor less than 15 inches above the floor or working platform."

The debate was about the center measurement. If you were to measure to the center screw of a duplex then you would have the bottom receptacle outlet of a duplex below 15 inches.
My take on this was always that construction measurements are always to center unless otherwise noted, so the measurement in the CEC should be to center of a duplex.
I was directed to enforce the 15 inch to the center of the bottom receptacle of a duplex "rule" until I was able to convince powers that be otherwise.

Hi E57
Beware on the side reach rule, as it only applies to multifamily.


Larry LeVoir
Inspector
City of Irvine, CA
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,876
E
e57 Offline OP
Member
"Beware on the side reach rule, as it only applies to multifamily."

What about commercial?

Oh, and get this, I asked our AHJ/Inspector today, and his take is, and I have to go with it, no waves at this point, it's getting rocked. Anyway, he didn't pull an answer from anything like I would have wanted, but gave this as an aswer, "Why don't ya just play it safe, and have the entire portion of the receptacles and switches within the 48" and 15" measurements." (i.e. 46 and 17) "That way the bottom portion of a plug isn't out, and the top portion of a switch, like a decora wouldn't be out of the min's and maxes."

Makes sense to me..... Like I said, been doing them for years at 18" and 46". (Mis-typed in the original post, at 42".)Which is what I held firm to for this job, and the last. Only recently have I even had anyone ask for anything else. But it seems this issue has been batted around before, as there was a need to "convince the poweres that be". Sandsnow, thanks for the direct wording there.


Mark Heller
"Well - I oughta....." -Jackie Gleason
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 167
S
Member
Yes, I agree...what about commercial? The state is silent about this area. We ahve never pushed the issue in a commercial kitchen. As long as the recep's are at or below the max, then ok. I can't enforce what's not in the Code anyway, but you can install to a higher standard.


Larry LeVoir
Inspector
City of Irvine, CA
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,723
Likes: 1
Broom Pusher and
Member
Hi Larry (sandsnow).

I was kind of "Shooting From The Hip" so to say, with the definitions, but more to the point I "tried" to quote what I remember from City of LA's Compliance Documents.
I downloaded a bunch of Compliance Documents from LADBS' site, for use on Design/Builds + just to have the information on hand.

"Center of the grip" is what I should have written - and goodness knows why I didn't!
[Linked Image]
[Linked Image]

Other than this, the measurements and quotes I normally refer to would either be from documents (mostly on-line) from a certain Building Department, or passed to me within an Architect's Specifications (or both!).

Let me know if you would like to review the documents I referred to above from LADBS, and I'll either send a link or the PDF document to you.

Thanks for the heads up on the T-Stats height!
I now am involved with HVAC Automation systems, and have installed many Zone Sensors with manual adjusts (temperature adjustments via a Pot.), on which, the thumb wheel being located at the upper portion on the device!
48" to the top would be pushing the limits - and would really suck for anyone in a wheelchair, trying to adjust the temperature!

As to the "Normal" Receptacles height (+15"), I feel the same as you do - 15" to the center is placing the lower portion of a Duplex device below the minimum measurement point.
My "fix" on this situation is to place the bottom of the box at 16" - making it somewhat easier to work on, and a little easier for people to plug stuff into the device.

I am thinking now of lowering my switch / T-Stat height, to be no more than 42" from Finished Floor level to the Bottom of the box (unless certain restrictions apply).

Thanks for the reply! [Linked Image]

P.S. Where is the ADA data located in the 2001 CEC? I have the loose leaf binder version of Title 24, part 3, but not sure where the data for ADA is found... so far I see referenced document names in the front section / California Matrix Adoption Tables. (BTW: for those persons reading this & wondering "Whaddaheckizzzthat"!, "Title 24, part 3" is the 2001 California Electrical Code;
Not to be confused with California's Energy Conservation stuff, which is Title 24, part 6).

I'll check back to this thread tomorrow AM.
Any suggestions per these height issues will be greatly appreciated!

Scott35

edited to fix at least one ambiguous-type statement... but there's gotta be more!!!

[This message has been edited by Scott35 (edited 12-01-2004).]


Scott " 35 " Thompson
Just Say NO To Green Eggs And Ham!
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 167
S
Member
Scott
Yes, I would be interested in the link to the LA stuff on disabled access, thanks.

Actually, I think the 15inch to the bottom recep on a duplex is wrong, but my delivery was not clear. I believe it should be to the center screw. To make somebody raise over a hundred boxes for 1 inch was my awakening. I called the state because I wanted to be sure and was told that the center screw at 15 was good. This was years ago.
I'm sure there are some out there who still enforces 15 to the bottom recep.

T-Stats, height req. only applies if the T-Stat is useble by the occupant. Some pnuematic do not have external levers. T-Stats in a locked enclosure do not apply. Key words in the code here is "intended to be used by the occupant of the room".

In the 2001 CEC check out 210-7(g) and 380-8(c) for disabled heights


Larry LeVoir
Inspector
City of Irvine, CA
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,723
Likes: 1
Broom Pusher and
Member
Sandsnow;

Here are a few links to LADBS' information:

Site Index-LADBS

Information Bulletins Cover Pg

Information Bulletins

I cannot seem to find the documents for the ADA stuff, as the site has been revised drammatically since last time I was there.
If you send an E-mail message to me with your address, I will attach the .PDF documents I have from LADBS, and send them your way.

You may send a message my way using either of these methods:

<OL TYPE=1>


[*] Click on the "E-Mail Icon" found in My User's Profile [Linked Image]


[*] Send a message to me "Manually" at: setelectric at pacbell dot net, swap the "words" for symbols - like "at" = @ and "dot" = .
</OL>

Scott35


Scott " 35 " Thompson
Just Say NO To Green Eggs And Ham!
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5