ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Where is Everyone?
by gfretwell - 06/20/21 10:53 PM
Happy Father's Day!
by Bill Addiss - 06/19/21 04:16 PM
A Risky Setup
by timmp - 06/18/21 08:08 PM
Conduit over Vinyl Siding
by Jim M - 06/16/21 08:30 PM
Updated Forum Software
by Admin - 06/15/21 10:23 AM
New in the Gallery:
2020 - 2021 Winter Project
2020 - 2021 Winter Project
by Bill Addiss, April 29
Garden 2021
Garden 2021
by Bill Addiss, April 26
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 15 guests, and 17 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#140464 03/12/04 08:39 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 107
J
james S Offline OP
Member
when looking up current carrying capacities in the 7671 regulations ( IEE ) how would you decide which reference method to use if there where two used in the intallation in question eg if general twin core and earth cable was to run for 10 mtr clipped dirrect and then a further 10 mtr enclosed in a wall?between these two methods the diffrence can be as much as 15 amps [Linked Image]

or is it educated guess time?

#140465 03/12/04 11:14 AM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,520
P
Member
James,
The ratings are based on the maximum temperature at which the cable should be allowed to run, hence the fact that the "clipped direct" rating is higher because it will lose heat to the surrounding air more quickly than an enclosed cable. (The "clipped direct" ratings are too high in the current Regs., in my not-so-humble opinion, but that's another story. [Linked Image])

So in the situation you describe, you would have to go with the lower current and limit the cable to its enclosed rating.

#140466 03/12/04 12:26 PM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 107
J
james S Offline OP
Member
just to clear it up then no matter what reference method used always go with the smallest rating method!
ie if there was again two core and earth cable to run 20 mtrs cliped direct and 1 mtr to drop down to fuse board in a insulated wall the insulated wall factor would be the factor used?

sorry to drag this one out but i think the regs fall down on scenarios such as this especialy when there is such a diffrence in carrying capacities involved!

#140467 03/12/04 01:14 PM
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,498
C
C-H Offline
Member
James,

The copper leads the heat away along the cable. This means that the current carrying capacity is higher than otherwise if the cable is enclosed or exposed to a higher than normal ambient temperature only for a short distance. I don't know if, and if so how, this is reflected in the IEE regulations, but it is likely that there are special provisions for this case. This doesn't mean you can use the clipped directly/free air value, but you may be able to use a higher value than that of a cable enclosed in an insulated wall for an indefinite length.

#140468 03/14/04 04:18 AM
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,520
P
Member
Yes, as C-H says, where the length of cable in insulation is only very short, it is permissible to use a higher rating.

Here's an extract from the Electrician's Guide:
http://www.tlc-direct.co.uk/Book/4.3.6.htm


Link Copied to Clipboard
Featured:

Tools for Electricians
Tools for Electricians
 

* * * * * * *

2020 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2020 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
The Watt Doctor
The Watt Doctor
Mont Belvieu, TX
Posts: 437
Joined: December 2001
Top Posters(30 Days)
Trumpy 10
Admin 10
Popular Topics(Views)
280,448 Are you busy
213,527 Re: Forum
200,406 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5