ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Solar PV Wiring Errors
by renosteinke - 03/02/24 08:12 PM
Do You Wrap Your Receptacles?
by gfretwell - 02/20/24 10:48 PM
Cable Chase Code Requirement
by renosteinke - 02/16/24 07:00 PM
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 02/16/24 10:37 AM
Cordless Tools: The Obvious Question
by gfretwell - 02/08/24 07:28 AM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 16 guests, and 18 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#128974 06/09/04 08:37 AM
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 201
A
ayrton Offline OP
Member
Why do you think the code prohibits running parallel conductors smaller than 1/0??

Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep
2023 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
 

#128975 06/09/04 11:00 AM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 59
C
Member
If you study the ampacity tables you will see that in the larger sizes of wire an increase in size results in relatively little increase in ampacity. Forinstance, a 50% increase from 10 kcmil to 10.5 kcmil results in an increase in carrying capacity in amperes of less than 15%.
There is no need to parallel conductors smaller than 1/0 because the difference between the carrying capacity in these sizes is much less pronounced.
Although the NEC places the limit, it is really physics that limits paralleled conductors to 1/0 and larger.
Creighton


Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5