ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 04/06/24 08:32 PM
UL 508A SPACING
by tortuga - 03/30/24 07:39 PM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
Portable generator question
by Steve Miller - 03/19/24 08:50 PM
240V only in a home and NEC?
by dsk - 03/19/24 06:33 AM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 37 guests, and 14 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#121802 08/23/05 12:00 AM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,682
Likes: 3
Admin Offline OP
Administrator
Member
Quote
What would be the danger of leaving the conduit(emt), connected to a panel with a feed from another source?

richard
[Linked Image]

#121803 08/23/05 12:55 PM
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 134
R
Member
Are we talking about mixing wyes and deltas in this little diagram?? And how is this thing all grounded/bonded?? Generator transfer switch??

This isn't my area of expertise so I need more hints....

RSlater,
RSmike

#121804 08/24/05 06:55 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 99
Member
The generator is 480 volt to a transfer switch, then to a disco, which feeds a step down transformer (step down to 3 phase 208/120 volt) with the neutral coming off the x-o lug of the transformer. The customer wants to refeed an existing panel off the generator panel and abandon the existing feed(when all is ok with the poco feed the generator is on standby, and when they lose power the generator kicks on). my question is this, If I leave the emt connected to the existing panel, will I be creating a hazard(since there will be two ground paths going back to the main switchgear?

#121805 08/24/05 10:03 PM
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 650
W
Member
I presume that you are asking about leaving the EMT connected, but that the feeder (and thus any ground/neutral bond upstream of the feeder) will be disconnected.

I don't believe that this will result in any significant hazard, and don't believe that there is any code violation. What you will be leaving is a loop structure in the non-current carrying bonded metal. While this is a violation in current carrying conductors (unintentional parallel paths, parallel paths through equipment grounding conductors, neutral to ground fault, etc.), it is expected in non-current carrying metal.

The only time in code where loop paths are to be avoided in conduit systems are when current carrying conductors are not carried in the same conduit as their 'anti-parallel' conductors (I'm trying to come up with a general term for the complete set of conductors comprising a circuit which carry net balanced current. Loop paths that include unbalanced current carrying conductors become transformer secondaries, and can carry considerable current.

Only in some rather specific examples (MRI rooms, certain communications facilities, etc.) is a particular attempt made to insure proper star grounding with no loops, and this is not a considered a safety issue, but a design issue.

I suppose that in an environment with particularly strong and changing magnetic fields, closed paths in the conduit system could become a safety hazard; this is the issue with unbalanced current carrying conductors, but it might be an issue with high field magnets for research.

-Jon

#121806 08/25/05 11:01 PM
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 693
L
Member
"I'm trying to come up with a general term for the complete set of conductors comprising a circuit which carry net balanced current."

How about "all phases and neutral", or APAN for short?


Larry Fine
Fine Electric Co.
fineelectricco.com
#121807 08/26/05 01:20 AM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,682
Likes: 3
Admin Offline OP
Administrator
Member
more photos...

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]


Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5