ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 04/06/24 08:32 PM
UL 508A SPACING
by tortuga - 03/30/24 07:39 PM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
Portable generator question
by Steve Miller - 03/19/24 08:50 PM
240V only in a home and NEC?
by dsk - 03/19/24 06:33 AM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 205 guests, and 28 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#121795 08/22/05 11:57 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,682
Likes: 3
Admin Offline OP
Administrator
Member
Quote
Apparently there was a problem with the underground feeders and they decided it would be cheaper to go over the roof. When we proposed a repair the customer's reply; "No, we haven't had any problems so lets wait until we need to make the repair." 408V 3P Parallel feeders. They must have decided a straight line was not a good idea.

Bill (LearJet9)
[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

#121796 08/23/05 12:00 AM
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 391
B
Member
Reason # 271 Why I Hate PVC

-John

#121797 08/23/05 01:24 AM
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 840
C
Member
Ok, let me play devil's advocate.

Yeah, it's ugly, but I don't see any code violations other than the lack of expansion couplings. That would explain the separation.


Furthermore, if there was a problem with the underground feeders, this may well have been an emergency fix done in a hurry to get the power back on.

I look at this and say "What's the big deal?"

Peter


Peter
#121798 08/23/05 04:16 AM
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,876
E
e57 Offline
Member
I get the feeling that the roof is newer than the wacky run. I may have been straighter before the roofers pulled it to one side for thier work, and never put it back. The other stuff on the roof being a bit more rigid, they just lifted up, splid new roofing under, and put it back down. The very slinky PVC they just dragged around, after all, whats it gonna do? Leak?

I will eventualy fail, that guys just hoping its after he retires.


Mark Heller
"Well - I oughta....." -Jackie Gleason
#121799 08/23/05 07:20 AM
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 197
L
Member
e57 is correct. The roof is newer than the PVC installation. CT is also correct. The PVC "repair" was an emergency installation when the UF failed.
Bill

#121800 08/23/05 01:27 PM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 178
J
Member
Judging from the corrosion on the straps, that "emergency" repair has been there a long time.

I don't think you can blame the PVC itself -- a properly cemented joint is as strong as the base material. (It says here on this can...)

It looks like maybe the S-curve might actually have been intentional, to mitigate the expansion effects. I wonder how much curvature you'd need to eliminate expansion joints? Would the wood sleepers eventually rub their way through the roof?

#121801 08/23/05 09:10 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,445
Likes: 3
Cat Servant
Member
A good illustration as to why our local code requires exposed conduit on roofs (like this) to have a ground wire....no matter what the material.


Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5