|
|
|
0 members (),
66
guests, and
14
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,669 Likes: 4
OP
Administrator Member
|
![[Linked Image]](https://www.electrical-contractor.net/Violations/Submissions/Loose.jpg) some pics here taken at a renovation job after the walls were opened up, a rather poor arrangement imo...
Steve (aka sparky)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 558
Member
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 147
Member
|
Did any of you ever watch "Cable Guy"
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,520
Member
|
Not exactly a neat installation, and I would not want a diplexer and the coax connections buried inside a wall either.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,506 Likes: 1
Member
|
Nor would I want my coax wound around what looks like a 120V cable. Bet you get some nice interference with that!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,081
Member
|
Is one of the NM cables not supported properly? (The one entering the knockout closest to the stud.)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 160
Member
|
Isn't there a requirement somewhere in Art 800 that requires a separation of 4 inches between power cable and commo cable?
Chris
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 681
Member
|
What about the modification to the plastic box? Better get a testing lab to certify the field mod ![[Linked Image]](https://www.electrical-contractor.net/ubb/smile.gif) 820.52(A)(2) requires a 2 inch separation. Pierre
Pierre Belarge
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,393
Member
|
i have no knowledge of who did this, but i suspect it was probably a fish job
~S~
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 402
Member
|
The way that coax is wrapped around the NM for support I bet it wasn't a fish job.
|
|
|
|
Posts: 2,236
Joined: November 2000
|
|
|
|
|
|
