ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Shout Box
Recent Posts
220/230/240V 60Hz Systems
by gfretwell. 09/16/18 12:37 PM
Acronis Backup 2017
by gfretwell. 09/16/18 12:46 AM
Inspection camera help
by Bill Addiss. 09/15/18 11:32 AM
Tingle off the water spigot
by Trumpy. 09/15/18 03:24 AM
Lighting Load questions
by HotLine1. 09/14/18 07:04 PM
New in the Gallery:
Plug terminals
Housebilding DIY wiring
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 14 guests, and 26 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
What's Wrong Here? #112337
05/27/01 11:38 AM
05/27/01 11:38 AM
Joe Tedesco  Offline OP
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Boston, Massachusetts USA
[Linked Image]

Give the rules in the NEC that can be used to cite the violation here.


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
Tools for Electricians:
Re: What's Wrong Here? #112338
05/28/01 09:46 PM
05/28/01 09:46 PM
G
Glenn  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 75
370-23(a).

370-16(a)(1).

400-8(1) if the cable is not NM etc.

300-11(a). Duct tape is not suitable.

300-11(b). It appears the cable is supporting the box.

Glenn

Re: What's Wrong Here? #112339
05/29/01 12:29 PM
05/29/01 12:29 PM
Joe Tedesco  Offline OP
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Boston, Massachusetts USA
Glenn:

The cable was 3 wire/with ground Type NM, and you called the other violations here.



[This message has been edited by Joe Tedesco (edited 05-29-2001).]


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
Re: What's Wrong Here? #112340
06/01/01 07:06 PM
06/01/01 07:06 PM
Tom  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,044
Shinnston, WV USA
In my opinion, if it wasn't for the language in 336-18, duct tape would be perfectly acceptable for securing NM cable. After all, that NASCAR 200 MPH duct tape seems to hold pretty good (Tongue in cheek).

BTW, some duct tape is now UL listed for it's intended use.

Tom


Few things are harder to put up with than the annoyance of a good example.
Re: What's Wrong Here? #112341
06/01/01 09:35 PM
06/01/01 09:35 PM
Bill Addiss  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,901
NY, USA
Tom,

Do you mean the uses found here? [Linked Image] www.ducttapeguys.com


I took some pictures down at NASA in Florida. In the giftshop the EMT receptacle drops were Epoxied to the poles. I saw no straps.

Bill

[This message has been edited by Webmaster (edited 06-02-2001).]

Re: What's Wrong Here? #112342
06/02/01 05:53 PM
06/02/01 05:53 PM
Tom  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,044
Shinnston, WV USA
Bill,

I forgot about the duct tape guys, they would probably be the ultimate authority on the subject.

Another authority on duct tape is "The New Red Green Show" on PBS. Everything Red does in the Handymans Corner involves duct tape.

As Red would say, keep your stick on the ice.

Tom


Few things are harder to put up with than the annoyance of a good example.
Re: What's Wrong Here? #112343
06/06/01 11:24 PM
06/06/01 11:24 PM
M
Matt M  Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 93
Laporte, MN, USA
A little trivia here. [Linked Image]

I was involved with some wiring on one of the 3M buildings in St. Paul MN back in the early 80s. This particular building was used for research of reflective sheeting and adhesives.

I think of this every time I hear the term duct tape. One of the techs that worked there told me the story of how this product was developed. They needed a flexible but very strong tape, and someone came up with the idea of applying adhesive to cotton fabric. The strongest weave of that day was known as cotton duck (e.g. Carharts), hence the name duck tape. It wasn't until other manufacturers started producing their own versions of the product that it was incorrectly labeled as duct tape.

Tape is normally refered to by the product that it is made of, not what it is used for. For example, plastic tape, rubber tape, cambric tape, cellophane tape, etc.

Don't you feel totally enlightened now? LOL!

Matt

Re: What's Wrong Here? #112344
06/06/01 11:48 PM
06/06/01 11:48 PM
A
Anonymous
Unregistered

If anyone can document this as true, I would be pleased to call it duck tape - indeed, I have seen such a brand. Your reasoning makes sense to me.



[This message has been edited by Dspark (edited 06-06-2001).]

Re: What's Wrong Here? #112345
06/07/01 03:52 PM
06/07/01 03:52 PM
Bill Addiss  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,901
NY, USA
Matt,

I've always assumed that people were saying it wrong when they said "Duck" Boy, we're learning all kinds of stuff here!


I found this Duck vs Duct explanation over at the Ducttapeguys site. Does this agree with what you were told?

[Linked Image]

http://www.octanecreative.com/ducttape/duckvsduct.html


[Linked Image]
Bill

Re: What's Wrong Here? #112346
06/08/01 11:16 PM
06/08/01 11:16 PM
M
Matt M  Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 93
Laporte, MN, USA
Bill,

Nope, totally different story there LOL. I think I'll have to stay with the guy from Minnesota mining and manufacturing, the cotton duck fabric just seems to me a more logical beginning. I know that a lot of my old duck hunting clothes were made of cotton duck material.

Matt


Featured:

2017 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2017 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
MarkC10
MarkC10
CA, Inland Empire
Posts: 43
Joined: September 2013
Show All Member Profiles 
Top Posters(30 Days)
Admin 13
Trumpy 11
sparky 10
Popular Topics(Views)
249,284 Are you busy
187,221 Re: Forum
176,579 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.1
(Release build 20180101)
Page Time: 0.020s Queries: 14 (0.003s) Memory: 1.0092 MB (Peak: 1.1861 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2018-09-19 15:16:06 UTC