ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

>> Home   >> Electrical-Photos   >> Classifieds   >> Subscribe to Newsletter   >> Store  
 

Featured:

 Electrical
 Clearance

 *
 Tools
 *

 Books

 *

 Test Equipment

 

Recent Gallery Topics:
What in Tarnation?
What in Tarnation?
by timmp, September 10
Plumber meets Electrician
Plumber meets Electrician
by timmp, September 10
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 1,240 guests, and 14 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#112117 03/16/01 01:11 AM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,672
Likes: 4
Admin Offline OP
Administrator
Member
[Linked Image]
City of Pittsburgh public swimming pool. The security camera cable run above the swimming pool appears to be in violation of NEC section 680.8....."Overhead Conductor Clearances". According to the 1999 NEC Code
Handbook (McGraw-Hill), the exceptions are only for Utility Company lines provided the clearance dimensions in Table 680.8 are observed.

Frank Cinker
Pittsburgh, PA

Software for Electricians

Software for Electricians, Installers & Maintenance Technicians

#112118 03/18/01 09:51 AM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,294
Member
By the 1999 NEC,there's an exception for CATV coaxial cables to have a clearance of 10 feet if they comply with Art. 820. If this is a security camera, it is CCTV, and doesn't comply, but I can't see that there would be a difference in the safety aspect. What do you think?
Realistically, the installer should have carried something larger than an 8' ladder.

#112119 03/18/01 01:35 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 84
C
Member
electure,

I feel there would not be a difference in the safety aspect. However, as you stated, it does not compy with NEC.

Frank (cinkerf)


Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5