|
|
|
0 members (),
24
guests, and
15
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,673 Likes: 2
OP
Administrator Member
|
![[Linked Image]](https://www.electrical-contractor.net/BCodes/Rusty.jpg) Is it a violation for a water pipe to be under the equipment here?
Joe
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
Member
|
While there is not a violation of the safety work space required by 110.26(A), there is a violation of the "dedicated equipment space" required by 110.25(F)(1)(a).
Don
Don(resqcapt19)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
Moderator
|
I am wondering about what looks like the use of parallel conductors smaller than 1/0?
Bob
Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,081
Member
|
Is it a violation for a water pipe to be under the equipment here? Or is the violation having the equipment over the water pipe?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 123
Member
|
I think a bigger problem might be the pipe above the panel from the looks of the rust on the outside of the panel and the trough under it. I popped a cover on one like this once and found two of the three fuses in the main rusted into the holders.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3
Junior Member
|
Lots of problems here. Are those the right kind of straps, look like one hole EMT straps to me.
334.15 B (NM cable?) "shall be protected" is not met.
|
|
|
|
Posts: 21
Joined: September 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
