ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

>> Home   >> Electrical-Photos   >> Classifieds   >> Subscribe to Newsletter   >> Store  
 

Photo of the Week:

Electric Cow Catcher?
Electric Cow Catcher?

Advertisement:-Left
Recent Gallery Topics:
What in Tarnation?
What in Tarnation?
by timmp, September 10
Plumber meets Electrician
Plumber meets Electrician
by timmp, September 10
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 76 guests, and 24 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,685
Likes: 4
Admin Offline OP
Administrator
Member
Quote
Here are some photos of a job site trailer-mounted generator. There are two loads, one is the wire in the PVC supplying the first job trailer and the second is the 10/3 extension cord supplying a second job trailer.

Based on these photos, can you spot the 6 code violations?

- Dave Nix
[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

Horizontal Ad
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 391
B
Member
  • 1st Picture:
  • Conductors subject to damage - 300.4
  • No mechanical continuity of raceway - 300.12
  • Incomplete raceway - 300.18
  • Incomplete raceway and no support on raceway - 352.30
  • If that conduit is schedule 40 and subject to damage, violation of 352.12(C).
  • If one of the conductors on that lug is the GEC, violation of 250.64(B)
  • If that lug is not designed for use with that ring-connector, violation of 110.3(B).
  • 2nd Picture:
  • Aluminum GEC too close to the earth - 250.64(A)
  • Grounding electrode above grade - 250.53(G)
  • The connection of that GEC to the electrode looks really suspicious, possible violtation of 250.70.
3rd Picture:
Not sure. Maybe a violation of 400.8 or something in Article 552? [Linked Image]

4th Picture:
Taking a cue from the prominent "Schedule 40" and assuming the conduit is subject to damage - 352.12(C)

Anything I missed? [Linked Image]

Question: Since that generator isn't even required to have a grounding electrode, could it fail inspection because of the violations concerning the electrode and GEC? Could an inspector really say: "You don't need that electrode, but since you put it in, you gotta satisfy 250.56 by putting in another!" [Linked Image]

-John

[This message has been edited by BigJohn (edited 06-19-2004).]

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 147
C
Member
I would guess that the job trailer, supplied by the extension cord in the third picture, would require a 120/240 volt supply and a 10-4 extension cord.


Link Copied to Clipboard
Advertisement:-Right


Tools for Electricians
Tools for Electricians
 

* * * * * * *
2023 National Electrical Code (NEC)
2023 NEC + Exam Prep Study Guides Now Available!
 

Member Spotlight
Posts: 362
Joined: April 2003
Top Posters(30 Days)
Popular Topics(Views)
333,350 Are you busy
258,687 Re: Forum
240,122 Need opinion
New Page 2
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5