0 members (),
101
guests, and
26
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
OP
Member
|
Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 76
Member
|
Where do You start ?? Must not own any side cutters ! Around here, I would install a Disc, & run flex to the Waterheater. Makes a nice looking installation. Is the romex #10 ??
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 269
Member
|
How could anyone walk away from this? ![[Linked Image]](https://www.electrical-contractor.net/ubb/frown.gif)
John
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 206
Member
|
Always nice to leave the covers off of the elements. No one would ever put their hand near there.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
Moderator
|
Do we know this is complete?
The breaker can be the disconnect.
It is tough to give answers without knowing the details.
Bob
Bob Badger Construction & Maintenance Electrician Massachusetts
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
OP
Member
|
Bob:
This work was what the AHJ found during the Final.
Your opinion of what you see wrong here will be appreciated.
Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
Moderator
|
Well if this is what it looked for the final the inspector should fail it.
The only reason I can say for sure would be lack of support of the NM 334.30 and the open cover that Capt. Al mentioned 110.27(A).
The other issues, correct wire temp rating and lack of disconnect can not be commented on from this picture alone.
Bob
Bob Badger Construction & Maintenance Electrician Massachusetts
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
OP
Member
|
Bob: Discussion!
That's healthy, and that is what we do here!
I make comments all of the time to help people understand the subject of the installation.
Pictures are always helpful, but cannot show every single item.
Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,143
Member
|
Without knowing the conductr size, here's a quick take...
Failure to secure NM cable within appropriate distance... (336-18 '96 NEC)
Failure to secure/support NM cable @ required intervals along run...(336-18 '96 NEC)
Failure to protect NM cable from physical damage... (336-6(b) '96 NEC)
Unprotected access to equipment (failure to install in an approved manner)... (422-6 '96 NEC)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
Moderator
|
Doug you are Chicago sparky right? As such you may not be used to seeing NM but it is often run exposed. In my opinion if it was supported properly without the loop to the floor, physical damage would not be an issue at least here in MA and RI. ![[Linked Image]](https://www.electrical-contractor.net/ubb/smile.gif)
Bob Badger Construction & Maintenance Electrician Massachusetts
|
|
|
Posts: 8,443
Joined: July 2002
|
|
|
|