ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

>> Home   >> Electrical-Photos   >> Classifieds   >> Subscribe to Newsletter   >> Store  
 

Photo of the Week:

Meter and the Bricklayer
 Meter vs Bricklayer

>> Recent Posts
Parallel Conductors low voltage DC
by gfretwell - 09/06/24 01:37 PM
How's all our Non-US folks doing?
by grich - 09/04/24 11:10 AM
Advertisement:-Left
Recent Gallery Topics:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
1 members (Scott35), 27 guests, and 17 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Member
This is a hazardous (classified) location.

Why?

What rules are required to be followed?

[Linked Image]


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
Horizontal Ad
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 147
C
Member
North of the border, this would be considered a "Category 2" location as it appears liquids and corrosion are present. Is the N.E.C. similar in defining this area.

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 259
J
Member
Whats the location ?

Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,527
B
Moderator
Wow, that looks like an agonizing quandary, for likely corrosives and flammable vapors are anticipated. I’m not up on the latest in enclosure innovations from Appleton or Crouse-Hinds, but it looks like “combination” NEMA type 6 or 6P and 7 enclosures [99NEC Table 430-91] would be needed.

There is another wrench-in-the-gears here. In typical situations for this type of equipment, it would seem to be insanity not to use some sort of anti-seize compound on ALL threaded surfaces. Is there anything listed for such an application that will preserve explosion-proof integrity?




[This message has been edited by Bjarney (edited 11-16-2003).]

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 147
C
Member
Other than the electrical equipment being explosion proof, is there something else in the picture that indicates flamable vapors? I don't have a very good monitor and some details are not clear.

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
I
Moderator
I am not very good with hazardous location work but the fact it is a pit has some influence I believe.

Bjarney
Quote
it would seem to be insanity not to use some sort of anti-seize compound on ALL threaded surfaces.

But why? all that stuff will unthread easily. [Linked Image]


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 794
Likes: 3
W
Member
All those wires dangling out of that box on the right looks like a bad idea here :-(

Horizontal Ad
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,527
B
Moderator
iwire — No personal offense intended, but I disagree with you on this. I'll bet rusted threads would make disassembly of pipe and cover threads very difficult.

Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
I
Moderator
I was only clowning around, I would think all those smallish cover screws would break before coming loose.

And the large diameter fine threaded J box covers would be just plain imposable to remove with out the "red" wrench. (heat) [Linked Image]


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,527
B
Moderator
Sorry iwire — I missed the smiley face in your post.

In some plants, anti-seize goo {like “Never-Seize” or “Fel-Pro C5A”} is a means of survival if anything threaded needs survive corrosion, but for explosion-proof fittings is not compatible with the ignition "venting process" as I understand it.

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Link Copied to Clipboard
Advertisement:-Right


Tools for Electricians
Tools for Electricians
 

* * * * * * *
2023 National Electrical Code (NEC)
2023 NEC + Exam Prep Study Guides Now Available!
 

Member Spotlight
Niko
Niko
Campbell, CA
Posts: 356
Joined: August 2006
Top Posters(30 Days)
BigB 4
Popular Topics(Views)
327,546 Are you busy
252,445 Re: Forum
235,098 Need opinion
New Page 2
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5