ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 04/06/24 08:32 PM
UL 508A SPACING
by tortuga - 03/30/24 07:39 PM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
Portable generator question
by Steve Miller - 03/19/24 08:50 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
1 members (Scott35), 381 guests, and 13 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 68
H
Member
Sorry I was wrong again if the neutral is routed only with single phase circuit then you dont have to count it but if it is with 3 phase then you do as below now this is from "99"

Table 310-15(b)(2)(a). Adjustment Factors for More than Three Current-Carrying Conductors in a Raceway or Cable

(4) Neutral Conductor.
a. A neutral conductor that carries only the unbalanced current from other conductors of the same circuit shall not be required to be counted when applying the provisions of Section 310-15(b)(2)(a).


(310-15(b)(2)(a)
.(2) Adjustment Factors.
a. More than Three Current-Carrying Conductors in a Raceway or Cable. Where the number of current-carrying conductors in a raceway or cable exceeds three, or where single conductors or multiconductor cables are stacked or bundled longer than 24 in. (610 mm) without maintaining spacing and are not installed in raceways, the allowable ampacity of each conductor shall be reduced as shown in Table 310-15(b)(2)(a).)


b. In a 3-wire circuit consisting of two phase wires and the neutral of a 4-wire, 3-phase wye-connected system, a common conductor carries approximately the same current as the line-to-neutral load currents of the other conductors and shall be counted when applying the provisions of Section 310-15(b)(2)(a).
c. On a 4-wire, 3-phase wye circuit where the major portion of the load consists of nonlinear loads, harmonic currents are present in the neutral conductor; the neutral shall therefore be considered a current-carrying conductor.


Be Fair, Be Safe
Just don't be Fairly Safe
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 257
M
Member
So... for a 3-Phase 240/120 Delta system. On a 400A, 600A & 800A service, what size conductors would be necessary. Each set paralleled in seperate conduits, using the largest size and the fewest parallels as practical.

I always used one set of 500 for 400A and two sets of 500 for 800A and the inspector passed it. Was this wrong?

I don't believe I have ever done a 600A service but I'm designing a job that someone else is intending to use paralleled 500's for a 600A service. I was told that the paralleled 500's would not give me 800A.

Who's right?

Thanks for all of the replies and good discussion.

Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 558
C
Member
Hi Master66

The 2 sets of 500's would give you a 760 amp service but it is permissible to use a 800 amp breaker to protect them. If your project requires a full 800 amp service or the calculated load is greater than 760 amps then you would need to use 600's. If you use 1 set of 500's for a 400 amp service then your load cannot exceed 380 amps but a 400 amp breaker is ok. The load on the conductors can not exceed the ratings shown in table 310-16 but if the ratings of the conductors do not correspond to a standard rating of fuse or circuit breaker the next higher rating can be used. This only applies if the rating is 800 amps or less. I would say that if the project calls for a 400 amps then you need to use 600's, 2 sets of 600's for 800 amps and 2 sets of 350's for 600 amps.


Curt Swartz
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
R
Member
master66,
In a 3 phase 120/240 volt delta system, the grounded conductor is not current carrying and no derating would be required. If the system is 120/240 volt delta, I stand by the answer I posed on June 8. If the system was 208/120 wye, derating may be required if there is a lot of nonlinear loads.
Don


Don(resqcapt19)
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 257
M
Member
Thanks for the replies guys.

It seems that I have been right all along in my past practices. I just got some bad information recently.

Thanks again.

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 11
S
Member
230.90.A states that each ungrounded service conductor shallhave protection NOT higher than the ampacity of the conductors....
if the service disconect is a single overcurrent device this does NOT allow you to use the next higher size if there is a single OCPD.

tom

Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 11
S
Member
230.90.A states that each ungrounded service conductor shallhave protection NOT higher than the ampacity of the conductors....
if the service disconect is a single overcurrent device this does NOT allow you to use the next higher size if there is a single OCPD.

tom

Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
R
Member
Tom,
What about exception #2 to the section that you cited?
Don


Don(resqcapt19)
Page 2 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5