ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat Box
Recent Posts
Look at this mess...
by Trumpy - 11/07/19 11:48 PM
Fire source!
by sabrown - 11/07/19 08:39 AM
Parallel Conductor Divisor
by LongRunner - 11/04/19 02:21 AM
FPE in Germany
by Texas_Ranger - 10/29/19 05:12 AM
Mistake in Instructions?
by gfretwell - 10/28/19 06:36 PM
New in the Gallery:
FPE Breaker panel in germany
What is this for?
Who's Online Now
1 registered members (Scott35), 22 guests, and 10 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
What changed, the wire or the breaker? #10334 06/06/02 04:05 PM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 257
M
master66 Offline OP
Member
Question;
According to the 2002 NEC, what size copper conductors are required for a 3-Phase 120/240V Delta 400 Amp, 600 Amp and 800 Amp service? Figure 1 set of 4 conductors per conduit (PVC).
The answer may surprise you. It surprised me (if I read the code correctly).

Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades
Re: What changed, the wire or the breaker? #10335 06/06/02 09:10 PM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,281
electure Offline
Member
I think I'd parallel some 4/0 or 250 in each of the apps (do your own math!).

Re: What changed, the wire or the breaker? #10336 06/07/02 09:39 AM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
R
resqcapt19 Offline
Member
How many service OCPDs are there and what is the calculated load on the services? It does make a difference in the code answer to this question.
Don(resqcapt19)


Don(resqcapt19)
Re: What changed, the wire or the breaker? #10337 06/08/02 08:23 PM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 257
M
master66 Offline OP
Member
resqcapt19,

Thanks for the reply.

There is one OCPD and assume the calculated load is the same (or slightly under) the OCPD rating.

Re: What changed, the wire or the breaker? #10338 06/08/02 09:47 PM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
R
resqcapt19 Offline
Member
master66,
I don't see any changes here. Any conductor or set of conductors with an ampacity exceeding 350 amps can be used with the 400 amp service, over 500 amps for the 600 amp service and over 700 amps for the 800 amp serivce is permitted by Exception #2 to 230.90(A).
Don

[This message has been edited by resqcapt19 (edited 06-09-2002).]


Don(resqcapt19)
Re: What changed, the wire or the breaker? #10339 06/09/02 08:36 PM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 257
M
master66 Offline OP
Member
resqcapt19,

This is how I have done it for years but was told recently that the SE conductor could not be rated less that the OCPD and that the rating had to be calculated in accordance with 310.15. In my case, for a machine shop, I believe that the neutral should be counted.

I have also asked other inspectors this same question and was told the same as you said.

Who's right?

Re: What changed, the wire or the breaker? #10340 06/09/02 09:25 PM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
R
resqcapt19 Offline
Member
master66
If derating is required because of more then 3 current carrying conductors or high ambient temperature, this changes the ampacity of the conductors. The ampacity after derating must be equal or greater then the numbers in my earlier post. This in not new. Table 310-16 ampacities are only for 3 or less conductors and an ambient of 30°C. If your grounded conductor is in fact a current carrying conductor, then you would have to use conductors with a table ampacity of 438 amps for a 400 amp service. This would require 600 kcmil or parallel 3/0s in seperate conduits, or parallel 4/0s in a common raceway. The wire sizes I have listed assume a 90°C insutlation.
Don


Don(resqcapt19)
Re: What changed, the wire or the breaker? #10341 06/09/02 09:38 PM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 558
C
caselec Offline
Member
If the calculated load of your 400 amp service is 380 amps or less then 500 MCM copper is fine but if your load is 381 amps then you would need to use 600 MCM. The same goes for the 600 amp and 800 amp services. As long as the calculated load does not exceed the conductors rating your ok. What do you mean by "I believe the neutral should be counted"? If you are saying that the neutral should be counted for derating purposes I am not sure why. If this is a delta service the neutral is only carrying the unbalanced load of a single phase winding on the transformer so harmonics should not be a problem.


Curt Swartz
Re: What changed, the wire or the breaker? #10342 06/09/02 10:09 PM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 68
H
hurk27 Offline
Member
It is still classified as a current carrying conductor. didn't think you would have a neutral in an open delta. but you would in a "Y" or center tap (A-C Phase) high leg delta.


Be Fair, Be Safe
Just don't be Fairly Safe
Re: What changed, the wire or the breaker? #10343 06/09/02 10:55 PM
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 558
C
caselec Offline
Member
Yes, it is current carrying conductor but it only carries the unbalanced load on the single phase winding of the transformer. There is no way all 4 conductors can be full loaded at the same time. 310-15(b)(4). If the conductor ampacity needs to be adjusted because of ambient temperatures then the neutral size would also need to be adjusted.


Curt Swartz
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Featured:

2020 National Electrical Code
2020 National Electrical
Code (NEC)

* * * * * * *

2017 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2017 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
BEAMEUP
BEAMEUP
WA
Posts: 27
Joined: December 2004
Show All Member Profiles 
Top Posters(30 Days)
BigB 5
andey 2
Popular Topics(Views)
260,573 Are you busy
195,403 Re: Forum
184,734 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3