ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

>> Home   >> Electrical-Photos   >> Classifieds   >> Subscribe to Newsletter   >> Store  
 

Photo of the Week:

Delco-Light Generator
 Delco-Light Generator

Advertisement:-Left
Recent Gallery Topics:
What in Tarnation?
What in Tarnation?
by timmp, September 10
Plumber meets Electrician
Plumber meets Electrician
by timmp, September 10
Who's Online Now
1 members (Scott35), 36 guests, and 16 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 444
S
Sandro Offline OP
Member
Is this still permissible in the CEC? Or must we continue using 3 ot?

Horizontal Ad
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 45
B
Member
According to CEC Table 2, 2/0 is permissible for a 200A residential service. Local authorities still have the final say though.

Joined: May 2001
Posts: 144
T
Moderator
For 3-wire 120/240 and 120/208 V residential services or subservices, the allowable ampacity for sizes No.6 and No.2/0 AWG shall be 60A and 200A respectively.

In this case, the 5% adjustment of Rule 8-106(1)cannot be applied.

Tony Moscioni
© Electrical Safety Authority - 2002

Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 444
S
Sandro Offline OP
Member
Tony... thanks for confirming this. I have a further question. Can I use 2 runs of 2ot (per phase) for parallel runs on a 400A residential service?

Joined: May 2001
Posts: 144
T
Moderator
This deviation . . . . 2/0-awg-cu for a 200-amp 120/240-volt residential services(3 copper conductors in a raceway or cable) for R90 / RW90 / T90 Nylon / & MI Cables shall apply for 200-amp residential services....ONLY.

If in your case a 400-amp service was required for a 120/240-volt residential service, then if you were to observe Table #2 - (3 copper conductors in a raceway or cable) for R90 / RW90 / T90 Nylon / & MI Cables, then 500-kcmil would be acceptable as a service entrance conductor.

Rule 8-106 Use of Demand Factors

(1) The size of conductors and switches computed in accordance with this Section shall be the minimum used except that, if the next smaller standard size in common use has an ampacity not more than 5% less than this minimum, the smaller size conductor shall be permitted.

Rationale and Intent for Rule 8-106(1). Switches and conductors are rated in standard sizes, and in some cases the use of conductors and switches with ratings less than the calculated load may be suitable.

We intend that the calculated load, as calculated in accordance with this Section, be the minimum size of conductors and switches. Rarely is the calculated load the same as the standard ratings of switches and conductors. We intend to establish conditions that can be used to accept standard size electrical equipment that is slightly smaller than the calculated load. For example, use 210 A calculated load; 5% of 210 = 10.5 A and 210 – 10.5 = 199.5 A.

Rule 8-106(2)

In any case other than a service calculated in accordance with Rules 8-200 and 8-202, where the design of an installation is based on requirements in excess of those given in this Section, the service and feeder capacities shall be increased accordingly.

Rationale and Intent for Rule 8-106(2).

The CE Code, Part I, is based on minimum requirements and is not intended to limit design. It is important that services and feeders be adequately sized for the actual loads they must carry. We intend that for services, other than those calculated in accordance with Rules 8-200 and 8-202, where the electrical installation is based on requirements in excess of Section 8, the service and feeder capacities be sized to meet the requirements of the actual load, regardless of Section 8 requirements.

Tony Moscioni
© Electrical Safety Authority - 2002


Link Copied to Clipboard
Advertisement:-Right


Tools for Electricians
Tools for Electricians
 

* * * * * * *
2023 National Electrical Code (NEC)
2023 NEC + Exam Prep Study Guides Now Available!
 

Member Spotlight
Vlado
Vlado
Croatia
Posts: 28
Joined: February 2011
Top Posters(30 Days)
BigB 6
timmp 2
Popular Topics(Views)
329,665 Are you busy
254,503 Re: Forum
237,006 Need opinion
New Page 2
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5