ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat Box
Recent Posts
Lock-down Thread
by NORCAL - 02/26/21 07:28 AM
Northern Tool Recalls Powerhorse Generators
by Admin - 02/25/21 09:49 PM
You will never guess
by gfretwell - 02/25/21 07:48 PM
New tool
by SMOKEYBOB - 02/15/21 04:59 PM
New in the Gallery:
Facebook follies, bad wiring
FPE in Germany pt.2
Who's Online Now
1 registered members (Scott35), 15 guests, and 18 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
230.2 Number of Services #100719 12/16/06 09:23 PM
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 7
D
djelectric Offline OP
New Member
Hi Everyone, I am dealing with a double house with two existing services and two different owners (two drops from power co. one to each side)and wondered how long 230.2 has been in the NEC ?
If I up grade one of these services the power co will require me to group them on one side to meet 230.2. However property owners do not get along and will not allow the neighbors meter and disconnect on their side of the house let alone the feeder thru their basement.
What do you do in situations like this ?
P.S. Power co has hundreds of buildings with more than one service drop with the same characteristics and no fire wall to a multi occupancy building.


Dave
2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
Re: 230.2 Number of Services #100720 12/17/06 07:13 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
I
iwire Offline
Moderator
It sounds to me like two separate buildings that happen to touch.

I would expect to maintain the two drops.

If each person owns their half neither has any obligation to allow the others electrical equipment on their property.


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts
Re: 230.2 Number of Services #100721 12/17/06 09:11 AM
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 7
D
djelectric Offline OP
New Member
Iwire,Thank's for your reply.
Double house looks like one house with two front and rear doors with a common center wall.
I can't find any thing in the NEC to get around this situation,the power co and AHJ are standing strong on 230.2.
Any thoughts or code refrences would be a great help.
Thank's Dave


Dave
Re: 230.2 Number of Services #100722 12/17/06 11:57 AM
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
I
iwire Offline
Moderator
I am not sure I understand what you need to get around.

IMO you have two buildings that share a common wall.

But if the AHJ does not see it that way there is 230.2(B)(1).


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts
Re: 230.2 Number of Services #100723 12/17/06 01:54 PM
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 7
D
djelectric Offline OP
New Member
Iwire, The power co and AHJ think I need to group the services on one half of the building,and install a disconnect out side and feed thru neighbors basement to the other half of the building.Neither property owner will allow the neighbors equipment on or in their 1/2 of the building.
All in all the AHJ is saying there is available space (on neighbors half) and be accessible if I set a disconnect (on neighbors half) and run feeder through neighbors basement to customers panel.
I hope this clears up what I am trying to say.
Thank's Dave


Dave
Re: 230.2 Number of Services #100724 12/17/06 02:19 PM
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 13
J
J_Erickson Offline
Member
The situation described is one building. Building code refers to them as "multiple single family dwellings". In order to be considered 2 buildings, they would need to have a fire wall between them. i.e. block wall. Not a fire partition which would be 5/8 gypsum, etc.

As far as how to deal with it with utility and inspector, I don't know. I'd fight with the utility. Ask to talk to a supervisor, and then their supervisor. Send a registered letter and get a written response. Tell them your attorney will be fighting them. Often, I get different answers from different people in the same utility. In MA, you would have some ground to stand on with inspector as there is a provision for not increasing the magnitude of an existing violation. Separate ownership makes this situation difficult. If neither owner will cooperate, there is no way to make this completely legal. You can't group the disconnects if one party resists.


John Erickson
Re: 230.2 Number of Services #100725 12/17/06 07:08 PM
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,316
renosteinke Offline
Cat Servant
Member
As far as service drops are concerned, the local utility rules trump the NEC. They are the "AHJ."

Just as important, there is already substantial law on the matter. The utility has right of "eminent domain;" if they order the stuff grouped together, the parties will not be allowed to "forbid" anything!
Likewise, neither neighbor would have the 'right' to deny the other access to the disconnect.

Now, it's the job of the town, and the PoCo, to solve this mess. You're just the contractor. If there's a problem, it will be up to them to take the necessary steps..

Re: 230.2 Number of Services #100726 12/18/06 02:11 AM
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,569
G
gfretwell Offline
Member
I am not sure how anyone could compel owner A to have owner B's feeder in his house. It would certainly make stealing power easy tho.
Can you say Kupltap?
The easy, if ugly answer, is to put the metering and service equipment on the front of the house where the property lines meet.


Greg Fretwell
Re: 230.2 Number of Services #100727 12/18/06 07:22 AM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 32
J
john p Offline
Member
Hey what are you doing in my yard......
I can go see my meter...
Get out I dont dont like you in my yard.

What a mess.

good luck.

Re: 230.2 Number of Services #100728 12/18/06 08:48 AM
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 13
J
J_Erickson Offline
Member
If I own one side, (depending on how property is deeded) and I do not want the other guy's equipment on it, good luck. Much will depend on how the property is deeded. Some are "checkerboarded" while others have property line down the middle. If proprty line is down the middle, there will be a trespassing issue. The town can not "make" you do anything. I used to do a lot of work for a utility, and did a lot of work where they would pay to correct an existing situation where there was a trespassing issue. I don't believe that anyone could make the owner of one side give an easement to the other party if he were opposed.

If however, commion area were checkerboarded, one owner would probably be able to install his meter on the other side of the duplex, and pipe around the building to his side. Still might be a code violation if you can't group the 2 disconnects, but inspector might be inclined to overlook it.

I still think this issue is complex at best.


John Erickson
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Featured:

2020 National Electrical Code
2020 National Electrical
Code (NEC)

* * * * * * *

2020 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2020 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
SafetyWired
SafetyWired
Pa, USA
Posts: 44
Joined: July 2013
Show All Member Profiles 
Top Posters(30 Days)
Popular Topics(Views)
275,411 Are you busy
209,304 Re: Forum
196,593 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3