The Electrical Contractor Network

ECN Electrical Forum
Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Books, Tools and Test Equipment for Electrical and Construction Trades

Register Now!

Register Now!

We want your input!

Featured:
   

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

   
Recent Posts
Industrail Control Panel bonding per 409.108
by sparkyinak
Yesterday at 03:17 PM
Calling all Non-US members!! (Non-US only)
by aussie240
12/07/16 02:39 AM
Photo Upload Tutorial
by DanK
12/06/16 11:35 PM
Sprinklered equipment 26-008
by bigpapa
12/02/16 04:24 PM
On Delay Relay with Auto Reset
by Potseal
12/01/16 09:59 AM
New in the Gallery:
12.5A through 0.75mm˛ flex (just out of curiosity)
Shout Box

Top Posters (30 Days)
gfretwell 13
HotLine1 9
Texas_Ranger 8
sparkyinak 8
Trumpy 6
Who's Online
0 registered (), 192 Guests and 6 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#99232 - 07/31/06 07:07 PM F/A
sprkrob Offline
Junior Member

Registered: 07/31/06
Posts: 5
Loc: etters,pa,usa
Today an inspector told me I cant put a flow and tamper switch on the same zone. My understanding is that they can be on same zone if they provide separate alarm and supervisory annunciation. This is a non addressable system. this is only thing on that zone and is programed waterflow/sup 1st floor. Am I correct???

Top
2014 / 2011 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
#99233 - 07/31/06 08:28 PM Re: F/A
JoeTestingEngr Offline
Member

Registered: 11/04/05
Posts: 786
Loc: Chicago, Il.
How exactly were you planning to test for all those conditions on two wires of a non-addressable system?
Joe

Top
#99234 - 08/01/06 03:50 PM Re: F/A
energy7 Offline
Member

Registered: 06/10/02
Posts: 58
Loc: Oxnard, CA, USA
They have to be separate or addressible: The tamper is a "trouble" or "supervisory" signal; the water flow is an "alarm" signal.

Top
#99235 - 08/01/06 06:38 PM Re: F/A
sprkrob Offline
Junior Member

Registered: 07/31/06
Posts: 5
Loc: etters,pa,usa
they are not separate but they do send different codes to central monitoring.
the zone is programed waterflow/supervisory.
flow switch sends alarm,tamper sends suprevision,trouble sends trouble.they are separate signals.there is also a separate ground fault LED. there is 2 resistors panel reads them.

Top
#99236 - 08/04/06 08:01 AM Re: F/A
tdhorne Offline
Member

Registered: 03/22/01
Posts: 344
Loc: Maryland, USA
sprkrob
Help me out here guy. I've done a fair amount of fire alarm work and I'm at a complete loss as to how you get separate supervisory and alarm indications on a single zone with non addressable equipment.
--
Tom Horne
_________________________
Tom Horne

"This alternating current stuff is just a fad. It is much too dangerous for general use" Thomas Alva Edison

Top
#99237 - 08/04/06 08:19 AM Re: F/A
rabbitgun Offline
Member

Registered: 07/25/06
Posts: 21
I've done a bit of FA myself and have never seen this one either. Please post back with the name and model of the panel.

Top
#99238 - 08/04/06 03:41 PM Re: F/A
sprkrob Offline
Junior Member

Registered: 07/31/06
Posts: 5
Loc: etters,pa,usa
OK
the panel reads 4.7K from EOL. You connect WF then 1.1k resistor then tamper then 3.6K then back through NEG. to panel. The panel reads the resistors. Pulls & smokes just have the 4.7 EOL on those zones. If the flow goes it reads 4.7 and goes to alarm. If tamper closes it reads 3.6 and supervision goes .You have to put 1.1 before tamper so panel can't read it. WF is NO, SS is NC. You program these zones to read it this way.

Top
#99239 - 08/04/06 03:47 PM Re: F/A
sprkrob Offline
Junior Member

Registered: 07/31/06
Posts: 5
Loc: etters,pa,usa
OH,
Trouble and supervisory are 2 different signals when programmed this way.

Top
#99240 - 08/04/06 05:30 PM Re: F/A
luckyshadow Offline
Member

Registered: 01/04/05
Posts: 305
Loc: Maryland USA
All I'm going to say is : Thank the powers to be for Addressable systems !!
Beats the hell out of those old hard wired systems.

Top
#99241 - 08/04/06 06:13 PM Re: F/A
Roger Offline
Member

Registered: 05/18/02
Posts: 1779
Loc: N.C.
Sprkrob is correct, I have done this in the past also.

I have also just used the tamper (with no reduced resistor) to show an open circuit and activate a trouble/supervisory signal.

I think the inspector is wrong and just not familiar with the installation.

Roger

[This message has been edited by Roger (edited 08-04-2006).]

Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >



ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals