ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Admin 16
Recent Posts
fuse rejectors
by gfretwell. 03/23/17 01:12 PM
Another Forum Update
by Admin. 03/22/17 03:04 PM
Dining room plugs
by watersparkfalls. 03/21/17 10:31 PM
TRUE POWER
by jraef. 03/21/17 09:13 PM
WEG CFW-11 Frequency Inverter
by jraef. 03/21/17 08:50 PM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
231,239 Are you busy
165,949 Re: Forum
160,476 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
1 registered members (TheShockDoctors), 85 guests, and 11 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
#98647 - 02/12/05 11:08 AM Type MC Whips  
Joe Tedesco  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Boston, Massachusetts USA
Quote
330.30(D) Unsupported Cables.

Type MC cable shall be permitted to be unsupported where the cable:

(2) Is not more than 1.8 m (6 ft) in length from the last point of cable support to the point of connection to a luminaries (lighting fixture) or other piece of electrical equipment and the cable and point of connection are within an accessible ceiling.

For the purpose of this section, Type MC cable fittings shall be permitted as a means of cable support.


Some interpret the last sentence as allowing the support up to 6 feet from each fitting to permit 11 feet, 6 inches of cable from a box to a luminaries without support.


Opinions?


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant

2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides

#98648 - 02/12/05 12:13 PM Re: Type MC Whips  
dmattox  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 265
Anaheim, CA
They are stretching a clarification at the end to defeat what the previous paragraph clearly states.

All it is saying that if you are going to a fixture or piece of equipment, the last 6' doesn't need to follow the normal support rules.


#98649 - 02/13/05 10:53 PM Re: Type MC Whips  
PCBelarge  Offline
Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 681
Dobbs Ferry, NY, USA
Art 320 has the same wording, but Art 334 has left out the last sentence from similar wording. Does this mean the NM fitting is does not follow the same requirements?

Pierre


Pierre Belarge


Member Spotlight
lil suzi
lil suzi
Midwest
Posts: 57
Joined: August 2003
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.014s Queries: 14 (0.004s) Memory: 0.7498 MB (Peak: 0.8709 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-03-23 18:16:41 UTC