The Electrical Contractor Network

ECN Electrical Forum
Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Books, Tools and Test Equipment for Electrical and Construction Trades

Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#98245 - 05/17/06 05:15 PM Table 300.5 and "Residential"
Redsy Offline
Member
Registered: 03/28/01
Posts: 2138
Loc: Bucks County PA
Can anyone interpret column 4 as to be applied to a "garden style"(non-high rise) apartment complex, and allow a 120-volt, 20-amp GFCI protected UF cable to be buried @ 12"?
Apartments ARE residences, and no mention is made regarding single or multi-family residences, except in the left column pertaining to driveways and parking areas.
But I think the intent of column 4 is directed at single homes and not multi-family dwellings.

Exhibit 300.6 ('02 Handbook) depicts a single home, but it addresses cable installed under a driveway.
Top
2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
#98246 - 05/17/06 05:23 PM Re: Table 300.5 and "Residential"
ShockMe77 Offline
Member
Registered: 06/11/05
Posts: 823
Loc: Rahway, New Jersey
Hmmm.

From NEC '02

I'm looking at table 300.5 column 1 and it says to me Direct Cable Burials (UF) shall be buried at 24".

[This message has been edited by ShockMe77 (edited 05-17-2006).]
Top
#98247 - 05/17/06 06:07 PM Re: Table 300.5 and "Residential"
georgestolz Offline
Member
Registered: 06/26/05
Posts: 90
Loc: Fort Collins, CO, US
Redsy, I would agree with your interpretation. I know I've used it in a pinch.

That said, it wouldn't hurt to confirm with your AHJ.
_________________________
-George
Top
#98248 - 05/17/06 06:38 PM Re: Table 300.5 and "Residential"
Redsy Offline
Member
Registered: 03/28/01
Posts: 2138
Loc: Bucks County PA
Shockme,

Look at Column 4, "Residential...etc."
I think that although apartments are "Residences" column 4 should not apply.

George,

I would not go 12". I would go 24".
Some other bidder proposed 12" and I think it would be a violation, but that is subject to interpretation of the word "residential" in column 4.

Thanks.
Top
#98249 - 05/17/06 07:07 PM Re: Table 300.5 and "Residential"
Dnkldorf Offline
Member
Registered: 12/12/04
Posts: 1091
Loc: nowhere usa
Redsy, the more I think about it, it shouldn't be used is this situation, because the circuit doesn't orginate from the residence in question. This circuit would be from the house load panel, and this in my mind would not be considered "residential"...

Any one see it this way?

Dnk..
Top
#98250 - 05/17/06 07:09 PM Re: Table 300.5 and "Residential"
George Little Offline
Member
Registered: 01/18/04
Posts: 1492
Loc: Michigan USA
That's an easy one for me- As the inspector I go to the zoneing department and see what the area is zoned. Zoned residential then that's the rules I use - residential.
_________________________
George Little
Top
#98251 - 05/17/06 08:22 PM Re: Table 300.5 and "Residential"
ShockMe77 Offline
Member
Registered: 06/11/05
Posts: 823
Loc: Rahway, New Jersey
I agree, Redsy, I would be sure to get that UF cable buried at least 24".
Top
#98252 - 05/17/06 08:54 PM Re: Table 300.5 and "Residential"
gfretwell Offline


Member
Registered: 07/20/04
Posts: 9066
Loc: Estero,Fl,usa
I guess you could use some judgement and look at the use of the dirt in question. If this was going through areas that are used like a typical back yard, col 4 probably applies. If this is some common area that gets used like a commercial site, park or playground it would be col 1.
It is certainly column 1 if this is going through a flower bed maintained by the landscape guys. I might even "suggest" pipe in there.
_________________________
Greg Fretwell
Top
#98253 - 05/18/06 07:12 PM Re: Table 300.5 and "Residential"
HotLine1 Online   content


Member
Registered: 04/03/02
Posts: 6833
Loc: Brick, NJ USA
Redsy:
IMHO, based on the text of the article, you could go 12" (Residential)

That said, without a 'lay-of-the-land' to conditions, I have to go with Greg's opinions.

Me, personally...I hate UF, I'd put in pipe!
But, I'm not involved in 'bidding' type jobs.

Did you run it past the local AHJ??? Or more importantly, did the competition???

We all have to remember that the NEC lacks a common sense article.

John
_________________________
John
Top

Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box

Recent Posts
Looking for older post
by sparkyinak
Today at 12:27 AM
License exam
by TRUE POWER
Yesterday at 11:33 PM
Members: Non-Members: Did you know?
by Admin
Yesterday at 02:34 PM
Safety at heights?
by HotLine1
01/21/17 08:51 PM
International Wire Colour Codes
by Texas_Ranger
01/21/17 03:29 PM

Who's Online
1 registered (Admin), 89 Guests and 10 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
New in the Gallery:
Desk-mounted "power-board"
Top Posters
gfretwell 9066
Trumpy 8560
pauluk 7693
HotLine1 6833
sparky 5545
Member Spotlight
Member Since: 08/01/07
Posts: 62

ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals