ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#98029 - 04/27/06 04:10 AM 310.15(B)(6) for underground conductors
Redsy Offline
Member
Registered: 03/28/01
Posts: 2056
Loc: Bucks County PA
Is this table permitted for 3 individual USE conductors to feed an underground service to a single family home?

310.15(B)(6) mentions raceway or cable, but I'm talking about 3 copper 250 kcmil in a trench, feeding 2 150-amp panels.
This is in NJ.

Hotline?
Top
2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
#98030 - 04/27/06 02:25 PM Re: 310.15(B)(6) for underground conductors
earlydean Offline
Member
Registered: 12/22/03
Posts: 751
Loc: Griswold, CT, USA
Nope, we can use Table 310.15(B)(6) only if the conductors are installed in a raceway or cable. Sorry, you gotta use Table 310.16.

(of course, I am assuming NJ has adopted the NEC without amending this part)

What is your computed load? Are you feeding these panels through a main distribution center or a disconnect and OC device? Or, are you paralleling the panels, using a 150 amp main breaker for each panel?
_________________________
Earl
Top
#98031 - 04/27/06 02:59 PM Re: 310.15(B)(6) for underground conductors
Redsy Offline
Member
Registered: 03/28/01
Posts: 2056
Loc: Bucks County PA
Thanks, earlydean!

It is a pair of 150-amp panels, but the computed load is less than 200-amps.
I hope to use 230.90(A) exception 3.
Also 240.4(B) seems to permit 250 kcmil copper, which has an ampacity of 255 amps @ 75 deg.C to be protected at the next standard size OCPD, which is 300 ammps.

Thoughts?
Top
#98032 - 04/27/06 03:00 PM Re: 310.15(B)(6) for underground conductors
markp Offline
Member
Registered: 04/12/04
Posts: 60
Loc: Kent, WA, USA
If these are service conductors (a service lateral), then I would say you can use it. It depends on how you parse the wording, but to me the cable or raceway restriction only applies to main power feeders. Here's the exact words (at least the first part):

For dwelling units, conductors, as listed in Table 310.15(B)(6), shall be permitted as 120/240-volt, 3-wire, single-phase service-entrance conductors, service lateral conductors, and feeder conductors that serve as the main power feeder to a dwelling unit and are installed in raceway or cable with or without an equipment grounding conductor. For application of this section, the main power feeder shall be the feeder(s) between the main disconnect and the lighting and appliance branch-circuit panelboard(s).


[This message has been edited by markp (edited 04-27-2006).]
_________________________
Mark
Kent, WA
Top
#98033 - 04/27/06 06:00 PM Re: 310.15(B)(6) for underground conductors
Larry Fine Offline
Member
Registered: 02/18/05
Posts: 693
Loc: Richmond, VA
It looks like the phrase "or without an equipment grounding conductor" means a 3-wire feeder need not be in a raceway or cable to useTable 310.15(B)(6).
_________________________
Larry Fine
Fine Electric Co.
fineelectricco.com
Top
#98034 - 04/27/06 06:58 PM Re: 310.15(B)(6) for underground conductors
HotLine1 Offline


Member
Registered: 04/03/02
Posts: 6778
Loc: Brick, NJ USA
REdsy:
Up this end of state, line side of meter is PSE&G jurisdiction for UG. (BUD, and they supply & install same)

IMHO, what you stated above would be acceptable, IF customer owned lateral.

Further input, give me a call on my cell anytime.

John
_________________________
John
Top
#98035 - 04/27/06 07:33 PM Re: 310.15(B)(6) for underground conductors
Redsy Offline
Member
Registered: 03/28/01
Posts: 2056
Loc: Bucks County PA
Thanks, everyone.

Hotline,

I,m not sure why PSEG is requiring the builder to supply service lateral from pole to meter, but they are.

Thanks again.
Top
#98036 - 04/28/06 02:32 PM Re: 310.15(B)(6) for underground conductors
earlydean Offline
Member
Registered: 12/22/03
Posts: 751
Loc: Griswold, CT, USA
Larry,

The phrase is "with or without", not "or without". It's gotta be cable or raceway.
_________________________
Earl
Top
#98037 - 04/28/06 08:31 PM Re: 310.15(B)(6) for underground conductors
markp Offline
Member
Registered: 04/12/04
Posts: 60
Loc: Kent, WA, USA
If they intended the raceway or cable clause to cover all the different wire classes listed at the beginning, they should have put a comma between "dwelling unit" and "and are". Also, why would there be an equipment grounding conductor in a service lateral? That is further evidence to me that the "and are installed in raceway or cable with or without an equipment grounding conductor" clause only applies to feeders and not service entrance conductors or service laterals.
_________________________
Mark
Kent, WA
Top
#98038 - 04/29/06 04:19 AM Re: 310.15(B)(6) for underground conductors
Redsy Offline
Member
Registered: 03/28/01
Posts: 2056
Loc: Bucks County PA
I have to admit that if the code writers are well versed in punctuation, markp makes a valid point. The more I read it, the more i agree with him. Of course, I'm not sure an inspector would be patient enough to discuss proper grammer.

Anyway, earlydean...

I hope I know where you were going when you asked me about the computed load.
Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >

Member Spotlight
Member Since: 01/22/05
Posts: 5316
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box


Who's Online
0 registered (), 95 Guests and 10 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
 
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
 
Top Posters (30 Days)
Admin 47
HotLine1 43
gfretwell 19
Ruben Rocha 12
Trumpy 9
 
Newest Members
Scotto, Freecrowder, clee512, Jdscott2005, FAIZAN

ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals