ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#96889 - 01/04/06 04:02 PM Identification of Conductors
ShockMe77 Offline
Member
Registered: 06/11/05
Posts: 821
Loc: Rahway, New Jersey
Whether it be 277/480, 120/ 240, or 120/ 208 V.A.C., do conductors need to be indentified at LB's?

How about neutral wires in LB's on a 120/ 240 residential service?
Top
2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
#96890 - 01/04/06 04:52 PM Re: Identification of Conductors
bot540 Offline
Member
Registered: 09/14/04
Posts: 174
Loc: Vernon Hills, IL
I'm going to guess no on your first question unless you have conductors of different voltage systems.Meaning 277/120 in the same LB. Read 210.5{neutrals included 200.6(D)}
Neutrals should be white unless they're no #6 or larger, which then the only need to be identified at termination points 200.6(B).
_________________________
Jesus may have been a capenter,but God was an electrician.Genesis1:3
Top
#96891 - 01/04/06 05:10 PM Re: Identification of Conductors
ShockMe77 Offline
Member
Registered: 06/11/05
Posts: 821
Loc: Rahway, New Jersey
I asked about the 277/ 480 thing because of a job I was on today where none of the conductors were not identified in a trough. They weren't terminated there either. I've had an ongoing disagreement with one of the other guys at the company about identifying neutral conductors at an LB on a residential service. I never had to idnetify them in the past, why all of a sudden now do I need to do this now?
Top
#96892 - 01/04/06 05:13 PM Re: Identification of Conductors
renosteinke Offline
Cat Servant
Member
Registered: 01/22/05
Posts: 5316
Loc: Blue Collar Country
I believe the code requires the neutrals and grounds to be marked wherever they are accessible- which, strictly speaking, would include LB's. Yet, I've neither seen this done, nor seen it enforced.

Now, were there splices made in the wires, then marking them seems to be "common sense."
Top
#96893 - 01/04/06 05:44 PM Re: Identification of Conductors
Jim M Offline
Member
Registered: 08/10/01
Posts: 457
Loc: Chestertown, MD, USA
One of my only 2 gigs in 10 years has been for not having coductors identified in an LB.
Top
#96894 - 01/04/06 06:48 PM Re: Identification of Conductors
bot540 Offline
Member
Registered: 09/14/04
Posts: 174
Loc: Vernon Hills, IL
Jim what do you mean by gig? Failure I assume. I've only heard that word in reference to a job.(ie that would be a nice gig to have)
_________________________
Jesus may have been a capenter,but God was an electrician.Genesis1:3
Top
#96895 - 01/04/06 07:24 PM Re: Identification of Conductors
gfretwell Online   content


Member
Registered: 07/20/04
Posts: 9039
Loc: Estero,Fl,usa
Quote:
"gig?"

Sounds like a Navy man to me.
_________________________
Greg Fretwell
Top

Member Spotlight
Member Since: 12/24/00
Posts: 4259
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box


Who's Online
1 registered (gfretwell), 95 Guests and 9 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
 
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
 
Top Posters (30 Days)
Admin 47
HotLine1 43
gfretwell 19
Ruben Rocha 12
Trumpy 9
 
Newest Members
Freecrowder, clee512, Jdscott2005, FAIZAN, Regitest2

ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals