The Electrical Contractor Network

ECN Electrical Forum
Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Books, Tools and Test Equipment for Electrical and Construction Trades

Register Now!

Register Now!

We want your input!

Featured:
   

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

   
Recent Posts
Industrail Control Panel bonding per 409.108
by sparkyinak
Yesterday at 06:29 PM
Calling all Non-US members!! (Non-US only)
by aussie240
12/07/16 02:39 AM
Photo Upload Tutorial
by DanK
12/06/16 11:35 PM
Sprinklered equipment 26-008
by bigpapa
12/02/16 04:24 PM
On Delay Relay with Auto Reset
by Potseal
12/01/16 09:59 AM
New in the Gallery:
12.5A through 0.75mm˛ flex (just out of curiosity)
Shout Box

Top Posters (30 Days)
gfretwell 13
HotLine1 10
sparkyinak 8
Texas_Ranger 8
Potseal 6
Who's Online
0 registered (), 236 Guests and 4 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#95742 - 10/03/05 02:01 PM 310.4
Steve T Offline
Member

Registered: 02/14/01
Posts: 312
Loc: Oak Park, IL, USA
A building has an existing 400 amp service with a 3" rigid riser existing.

They make the service 800 amp and add another 3-1/2" riser with the same conductor type, size, insulation, length, and terminated in the same manner.

Would this be a violation?

Does the raceway having the same physical charactristics include the size of the conduit?

Top
2014 / 2011 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
#95743 - 10/03/05 02:11 PM Re: 310.4
Ryan_J Offline
Moderator

Registered: 08/19/03
Posts: 1355
Loc: West Jordan, Utah, USA
Red tag from me
_________________________
Ryan Jackson,
Salt Lake City

Top
#95744 - 10/03/05 02:46 PM Re: 310.4
Steve T Offline
Member

Registered: 02/14/01
Posts: 312
Loc: Oak Park, IL, USA
Ryan--Would you mind elaborating a little. Just curious about the interpretation.

Thanks

Top
#95745 - 10/03/05 03:16 PM Re: 310.4
Tiger Offline
Member

Registered: 05/04/05
Posts: 714
Loc: Crystal Lake, IL USA
SteveT, I'm curious how you turn a 400-amp service into an 800-amp service without replacing the gear. It sounds like you're describing some kind of add-on.

Dave

Top
#95746 - 10/03/05 03:20 PM Re: 310.4
dmattox Offline
Member

Registered: 10/20/04
Posts: 267
Loc: Anaheim, CA
 Quote:
310.4 Where run in seperate raceways or cables, the raceways or cables shall have the same physical characteristics.


3" and 3 1/2" seem to be different physical characteristics to me.

Top
#95747 - 10/03/05 03:25 PM Re: 310.4
iwire Offline
Moderator

Registered: 01/05/03
Posts: 4343
Loc: North Attleboro, MA USA
Steve I imagine Ryan is thinking of this part of 310.4

 Quote:
Where run in separate raceways or cables, the raceways or cables shall have the same physical characteristics.


Tiger one quick and easy way is to provide 800 amp metering and add a second 400 amp service disconnect switch next to the original.
_________________________
Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts

Top
#95748 - 10/03/05 03:25 PM Re: 310.4
Steve T Offline
Member

Registered: 02/14/01
Posts: 312
Loc: Oak Park, IL, USA
They are replacing the gear.

I was just thinking the different physical characteristics tended more towards meaning the same type of metal, or not one metal and one PVC.

Does anyone have a reason why this would or could be unsafe? (Assume the raceways are properly bonded and such)

Top
#95749 - 10/03/05 03:28 PM Re: 310.4
dmattox Offline
Member

Registered: 10/20/04
Posts: 267
Loc: Anaheim, CA
I personally don't think there would ever be an issue with this install. But you are trying to avoid any differences between the paths. If you have a smaller pipe you would have a change in heat disipation and inductance for example, which might result in one path taking a larger amount of current.

Top
#95750 - 10/03/05 03:42 PM Re: 310.4
iwire Offline
Moderator

Registered: 01/05/03
Posts: 4343
Loc: North Attleboro, MA USA
Size is definitely a physical characteristic of a raceway.
_________________________
Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts

Top
#95751 - 10/03/05 06:13 PM Re: 310.4
renosteinke Offline
Cat Servant
Member

Registered: 01/22/05
Posts: 5305
Loc: Blue Collar Country
I thinbk that cite came from a discussion of "parallel" feeders. What I see, instead, are two separate service drops, going to two separate disconnects.

If these are then combined at a panel, I see all sorts of "multiple feed" issues."

If they are segregated from each other, all the way to the outlets, then we have two separate services on one building.

As I understand parallel feeds, they have to start, and end, at the same places.....not a separate disconnects.
If that is the case, I would have preferred a larger riser, with larger wires, coming from a single disconnect to a single weatherhead. Then, if the PoCo wanted to run a parallel feed, they would join at the weatherhead.

Top



ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals