ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#93868 - 06/22/05 03:07 PM Does this identification look OK?
Joe Tedesco Offline
Member
Registered: 10/07/00
Posts: 2749
Loc: Boston, Massachusetts USA
Does this identification look OK?

_________________________
Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
Top
2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
#93869 - 06/22/05 03:40 PM Re: Does this identification look OK?
BEAMEUP Offline
Member
Registered: 12/13/04
Posts: 27
Loc: WA
O.K. I'll be the fist one to bite, It looks good to me. Am I missing something?
Top
#93870 - 06/22/05 04:24 PM Re: Does this identification look OK?
Ryan_J Offline
Moderator
Registered: 08/19/03
Posts: 1374
Loc: West Jordan, Utah, USA
It looks like everything in 240.83 has been satisfied.
_________________________
Ryan Jackson,
Salt Lake City
Top
#93871 - 06/22/05 04:26 PM Re: Does this identification look OK?
Ryan_J Offline
Moderator
Registered: 08/19/03
Posts: 1374
Loc: West Jordan, Utah, USA
But what about 240.81?
_________________________
Ryan Jackson,
Salt Lake City
Top
#93872 - 06/22/05 04:50 PM Re: Does this identification look OK?
Scott35 Offline

Broom Pusher and
Member
Registered: 10/19/00
Posts: 2707
Loc: Anaheim, CA. USA
Looks like a 2 Pole frame, with no handle tie across the reset handles.

If this is a 2 Pole unit, then the following would be identification issues:

<OL TYPE=1>

[*] Listed as a 1 Pole unit on both Poles of the unit,


[*] No common trip indication.
</OL>

Scott35
_________________________
Scott " 35 " Thompson
Just Say NO To Green Eggs And Ham!
Top
#93873 - 06/22/05 05:29 PM Re: Does this identification look OK?
e57 Offline
Member
Registered: 05/27/03
Posts: 2876
Loc: S.F.,CA USA
??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

Looks OK to me, although Ryan brings up a good point, on 240.81
_________________________
Mark Heller
"Well - I oughta....." -Jackie Gleason
Top
#93874 - 06/22/05 06:02 PM Re: Does this identification look OK?
Joe Tedesco Offline
Member
Registered: 10/07/00
Posts: 2749
Loc: Boston, Massachusetts USA
I cropped the image to get a close up and here is the rest of the story.

Note: UL does not approve they list or label and the CSA I believe does the same.
http://www.nachi.org/bbsystem/usrimages/1/100_03031.JPG
http://www.nachi.org/bbsystem/usrimages/1/100_03041.JPG
_________________________
Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
Top
#93875 - 06/23/05 10:22 AM Re: Does this identification look OK?
John Crighton Offline
Member
Registered: 05/16/05
Posts: 177
Loc: Southern California
So you're saying that the problem isn't in the identification at all, but in the text that was added to the photo?
Top
#93876 - 06/23/05 10:38 AM Re: Does this identification look OK?
Joe Tedesco Offline
Member
Registered: 10/07/00
Posts: 2749
Loc: Boston, Massachusetts USA
Yup!
_________________________
Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
Top
#93877 - 06/23/05 06:40 PM Re: Does this identification look OK?
Ryan_J Offline
Moderator
Registered: 08/19/03
Posts: 1374
Loc: West Jordan, Utah, USA
I figured you were talking about code compliance with the breaker itself, not the added text.
_________________________
Ryan Jackson,
Salt Lake City
Top
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 >

Member Spotlight
Member Since: 08/22/05
Posts: 44
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box


Who's Online
0 registered (), 91 Guests and 10 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
 
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
 
Top Posters (30 Days)
Admin 47
HotLine1 43
gfretwell 19
Ruben Rocha 12
Trumpy 9
 
Newest Members
Scotto, Freecrowder, clee512, Jdscott2005, FAIZAN

ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals