The Electrical Contractor Network

ECN Electrical Forum
Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Books, Tools and Test Equipment for Electrical and Construction Trades

Register Now!

Register Now!

We want your input!

Featured:
   

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

   
Recent Posts
Sprinklered equipment 26-008
by bigpapa
12/02/16 04:24 PM
On Delay Relay with Auto Reset
by Potseal
12/01/16 09:59 AM
Wow, that was close!
by jraef
11/28/16 07:06 PM
Earthquake in New Zeeland
by RODALCO
11/27/16 11:25 PM
Calling all Non-US members!! (Non-US only)
by Tjia1981
11/27/16 06:33 AM
New in the Gallery:
12.5A through 0.75mm flex (just out of curiosity)
Shout Box

Top Posters (30 Days)
gfretwell 13
HotLine1 10
Texas_Ranger 8
Trumpy 8
sparkyinak 7
Who's Online
1 registered (LongRunner), 206 Guests and 4 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#93860 - 06/21/05 12:29 AM Headroom exceptions
e57 Offline
Member

Registered: 05/27/03
Posts: 2837
Loc: S.F.,CA USA
How far would you let this exception go?
You can't stand up straight?
Or, you crawled in on your hands and knees?

 Quote:
110.26(E) Headroom. The minimum headroom of working spaces about service equipment, switchboards, panelboards, or motor control centers shall be 2.0 m (6½ ft). Where the electrical equipment exceeds 2.0 m (6½ ft) in height, the minimum headroom shall not be less than the height of the equipment.
Exception: In existing dwelling units, service equipment or panelboards that do not exceed 200 amperes shall be permitted in spaces where the headroom is less than 2.0 m (61/2 ft).
_________________________
Mark Heller
"Well - I oughta....." -Jackie Gleason

Top
2014 / 2011 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
#93861 - 06/21/05 01:50 PM Re: Headroom exceptions
George Little Offline
Member

Registered: 01/18/04
Posts: 1492
Loc: Michigan USA
If it's existing, the inspector has to let it go. The code is not retroactive. Assume it was approved at one point in time and let it go. Check the records at the building department and make sure it was not bootlegged in.
_________________________
George Little

Top
#93862 - 06/21/05 03:22 PM Re: Headroom exceptions
e57 Offline
Member

Registered: 05/27/03
Posts: 2837
Loc: S.F.,CA USA
What about a new service, or panel, in an existing dwelling replacing the old one?

Wouldn't any dwelling built and occupied before you got there be "existing", waiting for your "new" service up-grade?

[This message has been edited by e57 (edited 06-21-2005).]
_________________________
Mark Heller
"Well - I oughta....." -Jackie Gleason

Top
#93863 - 06/21/05 04:50 PM Re: Headroom exceptions
George Little Offline
Member

Registered: 01/18/04
Posts: 1492
Loc: Michigan USA
New work must comply witht the current code IMHO, If you are replacing a panel located in a clothes closet or other location I would expect the installed (replacement) panel to comply with the current code, out of the closet. If the basement only had a 5 foot depth I guess I'd ask for it to be relocated to a more practical location if there was one. There are always going to be hardship situations that would require special considerations. I heard of a case where the contractor dug a hole 1 foot deep in the dirt basement floor in front of the panel to get the height requirement.

[This message has been edited by George Little (edited 06-21-2005).]
_________________________
George Little

Top
#93864 - 06/21/05 06:32 PM Re: Headroom exceptions
gfretwell Offline

Member

Registered: 07/20/04
Posts: 9045
Loc: Estero,Fl,usa
George, the purpose for the exception is to allow installation of new equipment in an otherwise non-conforming space.
I agree we should be helping them find a better solution if possible. I would certainly want more lateral space if the height was low.
I got into this at the Ca-D-Zan mansion in Sarasota. They had several "tight" equipment rooms. In one of the ugly ones I required a disconnect at the door so they could kill all the equipment before they went in. It was a 1920s Otis elevator controller that they wanted to restore. If you ever saw the movie "Hotel" that was the thing that was arcing at the end. This building was restored as a museum and they wanted the original equipment. The room it was in was the only place it would go but the head room was more like 5'5 than 6'6. We did remove everything else we could to open the room up.
They had "in sight" disconnects on all mechanical equipment in the project.
When I left it they had documented LOTO procedures in place for the maintenance staff but we know how that works.
_________________________
Greg Fretwell

Top



ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals