ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Admin 19
Recent Posts
fuse rejectors
by NORCAL. 03/29/17 01:44 AM
Old decora style outlets
by NORCAL. 03/29/17 01:41 AM
NFPA stuff
by gfretwell. 03/28/17 08:08 PM
Anyone hiring inspectors?
by HotLine1. 03/27/17 08:03 AM
ESA Arc flash course
by TheShockDoctors. 03/24/17 10:15 AM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
231,899 Are you busy
166,776 Re: Forum
160,888 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
1 registered members (bigrockk), 71 guests, and 13 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#93666 - 06/06/05 05:52 AM Overhead Span  
shortcircuit  Offline
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 608
massachusetts
Is there any restriction on the use of 12-2 UF wire for a overhead span between a dwelling and an accessory building?

The length of the run is 80 feet over a driveway not subject to truck traffic.

I'm aware of the hieght rules. (12ft)

Does the UF wire have to be a minumum size for the length of the span?

I can't go underground because of the paved driveway.

shortcircuit


2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides

#93667 - 06/06/05 08:00 AM Re: Overhead Span  
The_Judge  Offline
Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 23
It's not single conductor cable, so that rule doesn't apply.

It has to be installed as messenger-supported wiring, compliant with Article 396, that's all I see [Linked Image]


#93668 - 06/06/05 08:08 AM Re: Overhead Span  
George Little  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,489
Michigan USA
My answer would be that the code does not permit this type of installation in residential. I went to Article 340 on UF cable and read that it's not permitted per 340.10(11) that sends you to Article 396. In 396.10(B) the first words are "In industrial establishments only, ......."


George Little

#93669 - 06/06/05 08:37 AM Re: Overhead Span  
Ryan_J  Offline
Moderator
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,374
West Jordan, Utah, USA
Quote
225.18 Clearance from Ground.
Overhead spans of open conductors and open multiconductor cables of not over 600 volts, nominal, shall have a clearance of not less than the following:
(1) 3.0 m (10 ft) — above finished grade, sidewalks, or from any platform or projection from which they might be reached where the voltage does not exceed 150 volts to ground and accessible to pedestrians only
(2) 3.7 m (12 ft) — over residential property and driveways, and those commercial areas not subject to truck traffic where the voltage does not exceed 300 volts to ground
(3) 4.5 m (15 ft) — for those areas listed in the 3.7-m (12-ft) classification where the voltage exceeds 300 volts to ground
(4) 5.5 m (18 ft) — over public streets, alleys, roads, parking areas subject to truck traffic, driveways on other than residential property, and other land traversed by vehicles, such as cultivated, grazing, forest, and orchard


340.10 says that you must comply with part II of Article 396. George, I think you are only quoting one of the rules found in part II, which is for individual conductors.


Ryan Jackson,
Salt Lake City

#93670 - 06/06/05 08:38 AM Re: Overhead Span  
Last Leg  Offline
Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 41
Houston, Texas
Type SE and UF cables are not the same, as listed in the code. RE: Article 340.12 Uses not permitted. 9) Where exposed to direct rays of the sun, unless identified as lunlight resistant, and, 11) As overhead cable, except where installed as messenger-supported wiring in accordance with Part II of Article 396.
I do not believe 396 excludes this installation for residential, but you might double check. It DOES have section B that specifically addresses Industrial, but is not inclusive of this section in its requirements, only the type of support systems.
Also, refer to 225.6, which list minimum sizes for these installations, which would be #8 cu, #6 AL, for over 15'.
BUT, the cable must be sunlight resistant.


#93671 - 06/06/05 08:52 AM Re: Overhead Span  
Last Leg  Offline
Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 41
Houston, Texas
Whooops, sorry. 225.6 is for individual conductors. Guess it's just a support system, clearance to ground, and sunlight resistant cable, as far as I can see.
Hey, what about triplex; it has a built in messanger cable.


#93672 - 06/06/05 09:29 AM Re: Overhead Span  
George Little  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,489
Michigan USA
Your correct Ryan, I only referenced part of the Article but, read the definition of Messinger Supported Wiring and when I read it I don't see using UF 12/2 for this type of application with out a support system.

After reading Article 396 more closely, I guess it would be permitted to install UF cable in a "Messenger Supported Wiring system, as discribed in 396.2. It also appears that it would be more practical to install triplex.

[This message has been edited by George Little (edited 06-06-2005).]


George Little

#93673 - 06/06/05 09:43 AM Re: Overhead Span  
Ryan_J  Offline
Moderator
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,374
West Jordan, Utah, USA
George, I thik the messanger is the support system. You would have to have rings and saddles, though. Is that what you are saying?


Ryan Jackson,
Salt Lake City

#93674 - 06/06/05 03:16 PM Re: Overhead Span  
shortcircuit  Offline
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 608
massachusetts
Messenger supported UF wire?

I just assumed it was OK to run UF as an overhead span because I've seen it so many times around here in New England to feed sheds or accessory buildings.

With a porcelin screw-in anchor on each end of the span, proper drip loops, and enough ground clearance, what danger could UF wire present compared to single conductor or a triplex overhead span installation?

Was UF ever allowed as an open non-mesenger supported overhead span?

shortcircuit


#93675 - 06/06/05 04:51 PM Re: Overhead Span  
iwire  Offline
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
North Attleboro, MA USA
Quote
You would have to have rings and saddles, though


Or weather proof tie wraps, or lace it to the messenger cable with string. [Linked Image]

I do not know anything that spells out how we have to support the UF to the messenger.


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Member Spotlight
MarkC10
MarkC10
CA, Inland Empire
Posts: 43
Joined: September 2013
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.016s Queries: 15 (0.003s) Memory: 0.8161 MB (Peak: 0.9928 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-03-30 22:32:23 UTC