ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Admin 19
Recent Posts
Anyone hiring inspectors?
by HotLine1. 03/27/17 08:03 AM
Old decora style outlets
by Admin. 03/25/17 11:40 AM
ESA Arc flash course
by TheShockDoctors. 03/24/17 10:15 AM
fuse rejectors
by HotLine1. 03/24/17 07:53 AM
Another Forum Update
by Admin. 03/22/17 03:04 PM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
231,643 Are you busy
166,541 Re: Forum
160,728 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 81 guests, and 9 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#93255 - 05/09/05 10:30 PM Class A System  
George Little  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,489
Michigan USA
When you install a Class A fire alarm system, how far apart should the out going and return conductors be apart?


George Little

2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides

#93256 - 05/10/05 06:30 AM Re: Class A System  
Ron  Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 582
White Plains, NY
There is no specific distance required by the NFPA, but established by the project specification. I generally specify riser circuitry to be in raceway and separated by a 2 hour wall (or CI type cable); normal SLC's to be in raceway.
NFPA 72-2002
6.4.2.2.2 All styles of Class A circuits using physical conductors (e.g., metallic, optical fiber) shall be installed such that the outgoing and return conductors, exiting from and returning to the control unit, respectively, are routed separately. The outgoing and return (redundant) circuit conductors shall not be run in the same cable assembly (i.e., multi-conductor cable), enclosure, or raceway.

Exception: The outgoing and return (redundant) circuit conductors shall be permitted to be run in the same cable assembly, enclosure, or raceway under any of the following conditions:
(1) For a distance not to exceed 3 m (10 ft) where the outgoing and return conductors enter or exit the initiating device, notification appliance, or control unit enclosures.
(2) Single conduit/raceway drops to individual devices or appliances.
(3) Single conduit/raceway drops to multiple devices or appliances installed within a single room not exceeding 92.9 m2 (1000 ft^2) in area.


Ron

#93257 - 05/10/05 08:01 AM Re: Class A System  
George Little  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,489
Michigan USA
Ron- That's what I came up with and then I had a fire Marshal tell me and an installer that the out going and return conductors had to be 4 feet apart and I don't know where he got that information.


George Little

#93258 - 05/10/05 08:55 AM Re: Class A System  
Ryan_J  Offline
Moderator
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,374
West Jordan, Utah, USA
In the state of Nevada I am told there is a state code that regulates this....funny how the MGM Grand fire makes a person change rules. You might check to see if there is a local requirement.


Ryan Jackson,
Salt Lake City

#93259 - 05/10/05 09:13 AM Re: Class A System  
iwire  Offline
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
North Attleboro, MA USA
I believe RI has a rule for separation that was just recently added.

Perhaps Peter (CT wireman) will know.


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts

#93260 - 05/10/05 07:51 PM Re: Class A System  
Ron  Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 582
White Plains, NY
There is no national code requirement to install a system as Class A. If by design/specification Class A is required, it may be a project specific requirement. If not required by project specs, then install Class B system and don't worry about it.

[This message has been edited by Ron (edited 05-10-2005).]


Ron

#93261 - 05/13/05 10:31 PM Re: Class A System  
CTwireman  Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 840
Connecticut, USA
You rang, Bob? [Linked Image]

Yes, there is indeed a separation requirement that is now being enforced in RI, and it is taken from NFPA 72. The RI codemakers took the recommended distances in the Annex of 72 for section 6.4.2.2.2 and put them into the code. Actually, it has been in place here for quite some time (since the adoption of the much stricter 1997 code and subsequent codes), but until the Station fire and the new focus on fire codes, it was never enforced. Now the games are over and every detail of the code is being enforced.

The incoming and outgoing circuits of all FA systems, no matter what type, must be 1 foot apart vertically and 4 feet apart horizontally. (RI code)

There are a few exceptions of course but the new rule being enforced here makes fire alarm jobs quite challenging.

Peter

[This message has been edited by CTwireman (edited 05-13-2005).]


Peter

#93262 - 05/14/05 08:46 AM Re: Class A System  
George Little  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,489
Michigan USA
My conclusion on this matter is that a Class A system is optional and that the out going conductors and the return wires are not permitted in the same cable or conduit (with some exceptions). The spacings mentioned in NFPA 72 in the appendix are recommendations. The appendix is not part of the code and I can't enforce "recommendations". I also see only minor advantage of a Class A system over a Class B with addressable devices.


George Little

#93263 - 05/14/05 09:28 PM Re: Class A System  
tdhorne  Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 345
Maryland, USA
The obvious advantage to a true Class A fire Alarm system is that it will take more than one fault to take any initiating or indicating device out of service. That makes them a much better choice for public assemblies, residential facilities, custodial care facilities, and extreme high value risks. I have had class A systems were the main riser was sheered off by accident and the system still continued to function completely until we could repair it.
--
Tom Horne


Tom Horne

"This alternating current stuff is just a fad. It is much too dangerous for general use" Thomas Alva Edison

#93264 - 05/14/05 10:55 PM Re: Class A System  
George Little  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,489
Michigan USA
Tom- I agree with that feature being a plus. But if the conductors are shorted together we are no different than a Class B system. Since the use of addressable devices is the most common way to go, we see most systems going in as Class B.


George Little

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Member Spotlight
AllClear
AllClear
Belmond Iowa US
Posts: 44
Joined: August 2005
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.017s Queries: 15 (0.003s) Memory: 0.8157 MB (Peak: 0.9884 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-03-28 15:54:23 UTC