ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#91096 - 12/28/04 02:41 PM code violation ?
mj Offline
Member
Registered: 06/10/02
Posts: 186
Loc: meriidian, ms
Two business ,side by side with a firewall separation. If there are main disconects located outside, Can a feeder pass through one structure to supply the other. sec #230.6 is about service conductors. what applies to feeder going through one building to serve another ?
Top
2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
#91097 - 12/28/04 04:41 PM Re: code violation ?
earlydean Offline
Member
Registered: 12/22/03
Posts: 751
Loc: Griswold, CT, USA
There is nothing to prevent such an installation in the NEC.
_________________________
Earl
Top
#91098 - 12/28/04 05:41 PM Re: code violation ?
Wirenuttt Offline
Member
Registered: 11/10/02
Posts: 267
Loc: Massachusetts
The only rules I saw here in Mass is they wanted it sleeved and fire caulking applied.
Top
#91099 - 12/29/04 11:52 AM Re: code violation ?
classicsat Offline
Member
Registered: 11/23/02
Posts: 456
Don't know of the rules where I am, but I know of one buinsess establishment where such a situation apparently is so.
Top
#91100 - 12/29/04 12:41 PM Re: code violation ?
Physis Offline
Member
Registered: 12/28/04
Posts: 86
Loc: Burlingame, Ca. USA
I'm thinking of 230.3 and that is also regarding service conductors. I guess that's because Article 230 is titled "Services".

If there's only one service I don't know of an issue.
_________________________
Sam, San Francisco Bay Area
Top
#91101 - 12/29/04 03:01 PM Re: code violation ?
mj Offline
Member
Registered: 06/10/02
Posts: 186
Loc: meriidian, ms
there are 2 services, one for each building. feeder is passing through building # 1 to supply building # 2
Top
#91102 - 12/29/04 10:24 PM Re: code violation ?
Physis Offline
Member
Registered: 12/28/04
Posts: 86
Loc: Burlingame, Ca. USA
Again, I don't know of a restriction on feeders, only on service conductors.

Look at Service Conducors and Service Equipment in Article 100. If the conductors are after the service disconnect then they are feeders.

If they're not feeders then look at 230.3.
_________________________
Sam, San Francisco Bay Area
Top
#91103 - 12/30/04 04:58 AM Re: code violation ?
Yoopersup Offline
Member
Registered: 03/04/03
Posts: 822
Loc: Michigan
Wouldn't 225.31 apply as they are by code Two seperate Buildings.
If theres a Fire in one building the main would be shut down, Then firemen thinking there clear would start using water on live circuits.
Top
#91104 - 12/30/04 06:18 AM Re: code violation ?
Gary S Offline
Member
Registered: 12/29/04
Posts: 12
Loc: Houston, Texas, USA
MJ, very interesting. It seems that a literal interpretation of the Code would allow a building to have one service AND one feeder entering it. I am not sure if this is the intent however, it seems to be something that was overlooked. Article 225-30 limits to 1 feeder with exceptions and Article 230-2 allows only 1 service, again with exceptions.

Yoopersup is on the right track concerning shutting off power to the building. Definite safety considerations there, and not only to firemen, but electricians and maintenance personnel as well.

The 2005 Code allows a building to have extra feeders or services if "enhanced reliability" is a neccesity: 225-30(A)(6) and 230-2(A)(6)
Top
#91105 - 12/30/04 06:31 AM Re: code violation ?
earlydean Offline
Member
Registered: 12/22/03
Posts: 751
Loc: Griswold, CT, USA
The two mains are located outside, presumedly side by side. Firemen should notice both, and shut off power, then extinguish the fire.
Feeders after the main could run anywhere through the interior. If fire walls are penetrated, then they must be sealed and/or repaired, according to building code (as always).

Does common sense indicate we should maybe run building two's feeder outside the building? Maybe.
Do economic concerns indicate we should run SER, and keep it as short as we can (running through building one)? Maybe.
Either choice meets code.

Building code and the NEC define a building as a structure standing alone or separated by fire walls (not merely fire rated assemblies). Do not confuse the two.

Fire rated assemblies are not necessarily structural (but could be) and can include walls, ceilings, floors, and even roofs. they are intended to delay the spread of fire for a period of time to allow folks to exit the building safely, and the fire folks to extinguish the flames.

Fire walls are special fire rated assemblies that also will structurally support the building on either side of the wall even when there is a fire on the opposite side of the fire wall. An example is a masonry or concrete wall of appropriate thickness, with staggered nitches for the insertion of the beams and girders that hold the floors, ceilings and roof structure elements. If a fire should burn a girder completely through, the girder would fall into the inferno (due to special "fire cut" ends), but the fire wall would remain standing, and the building beyond would remain structurally sound.

Fire walls separate a single structure into buildings. Fire assemblies separate a building into fire or smoke areas.
_________________________
Earl
Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >

Member Spotlight
Member Since: 01/22/05
Posts: 5316
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box


Who's Online
0 registered (), 54 Guests and 8 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
 
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
 
Top Posters (30 Days)
Admin 51
HotLine1 43
gfretwell 17
Trumpy 16
Ruben Rocha 13
 
Newest Members
clee512, Jdscott2005, FAIZAN, Regitest2, sureshazhagai

ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals