The Electrical Contractor Network

ECN Electrical Forum
Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Books, Tools and Test Equipment for Electrical and Construction Trades

Register Now!

Register Now!

We want your input!

Featured:
   

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

   
Recent Posts
Correct rotation, wrong sequence
by Potseal
Today at 03:14 PM
Industrail Control Panel bonding per 409.108
by sparkyinak
Yesterday at 06:29 PM
Calling all Non-US members!! (Non-US only)
by aussie240
12/07/16 02:39 AM
Photo Upload Tutorial
by DanK
12/06/16 11:35 PM
Sprinklered equipment 26-008
by bigpapa
12/02/16 04:24 PM
New in the Gallery:
12.5A through 0.75mm˛ flex (just out of curiosity)
Shout Box

Top Posters (30 Days)
gfretwell 11
HotLine1 10
Potseal 9
sparkyinak 8
Texas_Ranger 7
Who's Online
0 registered (), 218 Guests and 4 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#90844 - 12/15/04 11:57 AM sizing of parallel feeders
pip Offline
Member

Registered: 12/13/00
Posts: 15
Loc: Little Elm,Tx
if i have a 400 amp 3 phase service and i want to parallel the feeders from the 400 amp disconect to a 400 amp panel, what would be the min. size condutors i could use? I would also like to know how you came to this with 2002 nec ref..ect. thanks

Top
2014 / 2011 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
#90845 - 12/15/04 12:12 PM Re: sizing of parallel feeders
gfretwell Offline

Member

Registered: 07/20/04
Posts: 9045
Loc: Estero,Fl,usa
310-16 pair of 3/0 copper @ 75c.
_________________________
Greg Fretwell

Top
#90846 - 12/15/04 12:38 PM Re: sizing of parallel feeders
pip Offline
Member

Registered: 12/13/00
Posts: 15
Loc: Little Elm,Tx
that is the same way i have thought however, i was told something different by a electric inspector today...He told me to go to 310.16
and find the wire size for 400 amps...which is 600mcm. then he said the total cir mils of my parallel feeders had to equal the cir mil of the 600 mcm...which means (2) sets of 300mcm..i need to show him this is wrong and why it is wrong...please help! thanks

Top
#90847 - 12/15/04 12:56 PM Re: sizing of parallel feeders
Anonymous
Unregistered


First thing I would do is use his own logic against him. With your code book open to 310-16......"Well if that is the case ,sir. How would you apply this method to a 1200 amp service?"

Top
#90848 - 12/15/04 01:02 PM Re: sizing of parallel feeders
pip Offline
Member

Registered: 12/13/00
Posts: 15
Loc: Little Elm,Tx
thanks...you guys are the best! i mean it.

Top
#90849 - 12/15/04 01:17 PM Re: sizing of parallel feeders
Anonymous
Unregistered


One of the main reasons to use parallel conductors is to reduce over-all cost. Point this little number out to him as well. MCM size is not proportional to the amount of amperage it can carry. Take a look at the 75 degree column and compare 1500 kcmil to 1000 kcmil 625 amps as opposed to 545 amps. Gosh that extra 500 mcm bought me a whole 80 amps of extra capacity.

Top
#90850 - 12/15/04 01:38 PM Re: sizing of parallel feeders
George Little Offline
Member

Registered: 01/18/04
Posts: 1492
Loc: Michigan USA
Are all the conductors in the same raceway? This will impact on the ampacity of the system. I can't agree with any of the answer unless I know more details
_________________________
George Little

Top
#90851 - 12/15/04 01:47 PM Re: sizing of parallel feeders
Anonymous
Unregistered


Oh sure, George, muddy it up with derating
My answer is per standard paralleling using separate raceways and following requirements of 310.4

Had the inspector used this "logic" to derate he would still be giving the wrong information.

[This message has been edited by kentvw (edited 12-15-2004).]

Top
#90852 - 12/16/04 06:02 AM Re: sizing of parallel feeders
George Little Offline
Member

Registered: 01/18/04
Posts: 1492
Loc: Michigan USA
Okay kentvw- you made me get the book out. I used the situation you discribe with 2 raceways. Used THHN insulation in a damp or dry location. Turns out that if you are required to count the neutral as you would for a wye, you are still okay with 3/0. 225a x .8 x 2 = 360 Round up to 400 per 240.4(B). If you install all the conductors in the same race way your in trouble 225a x .7 x 2 = 315 and round up to 350. I've used the code reference Table 310.15(B)(2)(a) The other inspectors approach was incorrect IMHO and I've never heard of his approach used by any instructor out there.
_________________________
George Little

Top
#90853 - 12/16/04 06:35 AM Re: sizing of parallel feeders
Anonymous
Unregistered


George, Just because I have done something a certain way for years does not necessarily make it right.
Could you then comment on 310.15(4)(a) and also 310.15 (4) (c)
An electricians call? an engineers call?

Must admit that I did not considered derating in my earlier posts.

[This message has been edited by kentvw (edited 12-16-2004).]

Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >



ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals