ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 04/06/24 08:32 PM
UL 508A SPACING
by tortuga - 03/30/24 07:39 PM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
Portable generator question
by Steve Miller - 03/19/24 08:50 PM
240V only in a home and NEC?
by dsk - 03/19/24 06:33 AM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 220 guests, and 12 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#90647 12/07/04 11:56 AM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,716
R
Roger Offline OP
Member
Anybody ever notice specific items (90.7) that are required to be listed such as conduit and tubing 3xx.6 sections.

I find it interesting that per article 240 the only breakers required to be listed are those in 240.83(D) for switch (SWD) and HID use.

Roger

Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep
2023 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
 

#90648 12/07/04 05:07 PM
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 494
M
Member
Hi,
I beleive breakers for HVAC use are required to be labled for use as well.

Hope that helps a little.

-regards

Mustang

#90649 12/07/04 06:45 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,374
R
Moderator
Hi Roger. I remember you and I talking aobut this a long time ago, and I remember that it surprised me then as much as it does now!

One more thing to consider, however, is that while only some things need to be listed, all things need to be approved, as per 90.4 and 90.7. While I hate to take the easy road out and yell 90.4, I think I would have to on this one [Linked Image]


Ryan Jackson,
Salt Lake City
#90650 12/07/04 07:42 PM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,716
R
Roger Offline OP
Member
Hello Greg and Ryan. Ryan, (did you get my e-mail the other day) as you know I'm a firm supporter of inspectors using their experience, knowledge, common sense, and education to approve installations.

I think the UL (or other third party) listing has turned into a crutch for some and it in someways has reduced some inspectors to robots if you will.

I don't think 90.4 and 90.7 are dreaded article sections, I think if used properly they are very important.

Roger

#90651 12/07/04 07:51 PM
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,374
R
Moderator
Hey Roger [Linked Image]

I got your E-mail the other day and laughed for quite some time over it [Linked Image] Sorry I didn't reply, but I've been so busy I'm pulling out my hair!

To all users: Sorry I haven't been around much lately, I've been working on code change stuff for classes and sorts of other stuff. Still alive and well though [Linked Image]


Ryan Jackson,
Salt Lake City
#90652 12/07/04 08:49 PM
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,716
R
Roger Offline OP
Member
Ryan, glad to hear all is well, don't get to overwelmed with the work load. I know that is much easier said than done, so take care anyways. [Linked Image]

Roger


Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5