ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#89457 - 09/16/04 05:31 AM Transformer Overcurrent Protection
mistermike Offline
Junior Member
Registered: 05/17/04
Posts: 3
I'm getting differing opinions on the interpretation of Note 2 to Table 450.3(B). I have a 150 kVA, 480-208Y/120 V indoor dry-type transformer feeding three main breaker panelboards. The question comes from the phrase in Note 2 "shall not exceed the allowed value of a single overcurrent device". Is that value for multiple overcurrent devices (a) strictly a maximum of 125% of transformer rated current, or (b) permitted to be as high as "the next higher standard rating" of Note 1 of Table 450.3(B). If "value" means (a), the sum of the three main breakers is limited to 520 A, but if "value" means (b), I can go to 600 A.
Top
2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
#89458 - 09/16/04 07:39 AM Re: Transformer Overcurrent Protection
resqcapt19 Offline
Member
Registered: 11/10/00
Posts: 2148
Loc: IL
Mike,
The value is per note 1, in my opinion. This permits the rounding up to a total of 600 amps for the three overcurrent protective devices. Don't forget that the conductors between the transformer and the panles must be protected per 240.21(C).
Don
_________________________
Don(resqcapt19)
Top
#89459 - 09/16/04 09:41 AM Re: Transformer Overcurrent Protection
Ryan_J Offline
Moderator
Registered: 08/19/03
Posts: 1374
Loc: West Jordan, Utah, USA
There is an interesting change to this in the 2005.
_________________________
Ryan Jackson,
Salt Lake City
Top
#89460 - 09/16/04 02:27 PM Re: Transformer Overcurrent Protection
iwire Offline
Moderator
Registered: 01/05/03
Posts: 4391
Loc: North Attleboro, MA USA
Quote:
There is an interesting change to this in the 2005.


Ryan is such a code teaser.

Come on and give it up.
_________________________
Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts
Top
#89461 - 09/17/04 06:21 AM Re: Transformer Overcurrent Protection
Ryan_J Offline
Moderator
Registered: 08/19/03
Posts: 1374
Loc: West Jordan, Utah, USA
240.21(C) in the 2005 now says that you cannot use 240.4(B) on the secondary side.
_________________________
Ryan Jackson,
Salt Lake City
Top
#89462 - 09/17/04 11:23 AM Re: Transformer Overcurrent Protection
cpal Offline
Member
Registered: 05/17/04
Posts: 162
Loc: Cohasset MA
If I'm reading note two correctly it appears to only apply if the primary overcurrent protection is sized larger than 125% of the pri FLA?? In that are compelled to additionally protect the secondary winding.

If the pri OCPD is sized to protect the transformers pri. per 450.3 (B) [pri protection only} , then OCP for the secondary winding is not required.

You may have multiple taps from the secondary of the transformer (as mentioned 240.21 (C) ) to several loads the secondary conductors must be protected per that section and article 240.
If your pri overcurrent protection exceeds 225 A (480/.83)I think Note two is applicable.??


RYAN could you indicate the paragraph in the 05 that references 240.4 I'm looking at the pre-print and appear to be missing it!!

charlie

[This message has been edited by cpal (edited 09-17-2004).]
Top
#89463 - 09/17/04 01:24 PM Re: Transformer Overcurrent Protection
mistermike Offline
Junior Member
Registered: 05/17/04
Posts: 3
Thanks for all of the feedback. In the end, the local AHJ said we had to stick strictly with 125%; next larger size denied. Sounds like the 2005 NEC will make all of the discussion go away.
Top
#89464 - 09/19/04 10:52 AM Re: Transformer Overcurrent Protection
Ryan_J Offline
Moderator
Registered: 08/19/03
Posts: 1374
Loc: West Jordan, Utah, USA
From the 2005:

240.21(C) Transfomrer secondary conductors. Each set of conductors feeding seperate loads shall be permitted to be connected to a transformer secondary, without overcurrent protection at the secondary, as specified in 240.21(C)(1) through (C)(6). The provisions of 240.4(B) shall not be permitted for transformer secondary conductors.


*(C)(1)through(C)(6) are the 10', 25', etc., rules, similiar to the 2002.
_________________________
Ryan Jackson,
Salt Lake City
Top
#89465 - 09/19/04 05:29 PM Re: Transformer Overcurrent Protection
cpal Offline
Member
Registered: 05/17/04
Posts: 162
Loc: Cohasset MA
Thanks Ryan

The reference to 240.4 (B) was accepted in Comment stage and not in the pre-print.

charlie
Top

Member Spotlight
Member Since: 11/17/00
Posts: 2232
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box


Who's Online
0 registered (), 61 Guests and 7 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
 
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
 
Top Posters (30 Days)
Admin 51
HotLine1 43
gfretwell 17
Trumpy 16
Ruben Rocha 13
 
Newest Members
clee512, Jdscott2005, FAIZAN, Regitest2, sureshazhagai

ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals