ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Admin 16
Recent Posts
fuse rejectors
by HotLine1. 03/24/17 07:53 AM
Another Forum Update
by Admin. 03/22/17 03:04 PM
Dining room plugs
by watersparkfalls. 03/21/17 10:31 PM
TRUE POWER
by jraef. 03/21/17 09:13 PM
WEG CFW-11 Frequency Inverter
by jraef. 03/21/17 08:50 PM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
231,308 Are you busy
166,041 Re: Forum
160,519 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
1 registered members (HotLine1), 52 guests, and 11 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
#88649 - 07/02/04 12:26 PM Standards Council Meeting  
CharlieE  Offline
Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 200
Indianapolis
The NFPA Standards Council will be meeting on July 14, 2004 in San Francisco, CA to make a final decision on the items being appealed and the items sent back to the Code Making Panels. If you are interested in seeing what the panels have done with the items that were sent back, go here and choose items from the July 14 items. [Linked Image]


Charlie Eldridge, Indianapolis Utility Power Guy

2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides

#88650 - 07/02/04 02:00 PM Re: Standards Council Meeting  
Bill Addiss  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,875
NY, USA
Thanks Charlie!

[Linked Image]
Bill


#88651 - 07/06/04 11:29 AM Re: Standards Council Meeting  
ElectricAL  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 597
Minneapolis, MN USA
CharlieE,

Thanks for this link. Since I am, at the moment, primarily interested in what the 2005 NEC 210.12(B) will look like, I found it frustrating to find all the info as it is scattered over four downloads. I finally got over 38 (thirty eight) Megs downloaded, used WinZip, and read the documents.

The WinZipped files pertaining to 210.12(B) are:
Att 04-7-1-a-1.pdf
Att04-7-1-a-2.pdf
Att04-7-1-a-3.pdf
Att04-7-1-a-4.pdf
Att04-7-1-a-5.pdf
Att-7-1-a-6.pdf
Att04-7-1-a-7.pdf

None of these files are in "Attachments, Part 2" so you can skip it, saving an 8 MB download and extraction.

This is rather exciting. Nine more days to go until showtime at the July 14-16 Standards Council Meeting in San Francisco.

Al


Al Hildenbrand

#88652 - 07/10/04 10:53 PM Re: Standards Council Meeting  
Admin  Offline

Administrator
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,434
NY, USA
Following provided by ElectricAl as those specific to AFCIs:

Att04-7-1-a-1.pdf > 1359KB PDF

Att04-7-1-a-2.pdf > 80KB PDF

Att04-7-1-a-3.pdf > 63KB PDF

Att04-7-1-a-4.pdf > 52KB PDF

Att04-7-1-a-5.pdf > 31KB PDF

Att04-7-1-a-6.pdf > 154KB PDF

Att04-7-1-a-7.pdf > 87KB PDF


#88653 - 07/13/04 05:45 PM Re: Standards Council Meeting  
ElectricAL  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 597
Minneapolis, MN USA
The NFPA Standards Council meeting starts tomorrow (Wed.) morning 8 AM PST.

First item on the printed agenda is the dust up over 210.12(B). [Linked Image]


Al Hildenbrand

#88654 - 07/14/04 06:58 PM Re: Standards Council Meeting  
ElectricAL  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 597
Minneapolis, MN USA
Any word yet?


Al Hildenbrand

#88655 - 07/17/04 11:27 AM Re: Standards Council Meeting  
ElectricAL  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 597
Minneapolis, MN USA
Bump.


Al Hildenbrand

#88656 - 07/22/04 11:31 PM Re: Standards Council Meeting  
ElectricAL  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 597
Minneapolis, MN USA
The [b]Standards Council Appeals Decisions[/b] are available to read. [Linked Image]


Al Hildenbrand

#88657 - 07/23/04 03:15 AM Re: Standards Council Meeting  
SolarPowered  Offline
Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 625
Palo Alto, CA, USA
A must admit that I'm having a little trouble decoding all the "accept the proposal to reject the acceptance of the rejection of the..." language. If I got it right, they voted not to extend AFCIs to all living areas, but they're going to vote on it again later? Can anybody confirm whether this is what they're actually trying to say?


#88658 - 07/23/04 08:49 AM Re: Standards Council Meeting  
CharlieE  Offline
Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 200
Indianapolis
Sorry, you have to look at the way things are actually acted upon. For instance, during the Comment stage a comment may say, "Reject proposal 10-123." The panel votes to accept or reject the comment. Therefore, panel 10 accepts comment 10-90 to reject proposal 10-123." That same logic carries over to the Standards Council.

To answer your question, all of the appeals to overturn the panel action have failed except for one. This includes the attempt to require AFCI protection on all 15 and 20 ampere circuits. [Linked Image]


Charlie Eldridge, Indianapolis Utility Power Guy


Member Spotlight
electure
electure
Fullerton, CA USA
Posts: 4,259
Joined: December 2000
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.021s Queries: 14 (0.003s) Memory: 0.8079 MB (Peak: 0.9805 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-03-24 12:08:33 UTC