The Electrical Contractor Network

ECN Electrical Forum
Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Books, Tools and Test Equipment for Electrical and Construction Trades

Register Now!

Register Now!

We want your input!

Featured:
   

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

   
Recent Posts
Correct rotation, wrong sequence
by Potseal
Today at 03:14 PM
Industrail Control Panel bonding per 409.108
by sparkyinak
Yesterday at 06:29 PM
Calling all Non-US members!! (Non-US only)
by aussie240
12/07/16 02:39 AM
Photo Upload Tutorial
by DanK
12/06/16 11:35 PM
Sprinklered equipment 26-008
by bigpapa
12/02/16 04:24 PM
New in the Gallery:
12.5A through 0.75mm˛ flex (just out of curiosity)
Shout Box

Top Posters (30 Days)
gfretwell 11
HotLine1 10
Potseal 9
sparkyinak 8
Texas_Ranger 7
Who's Online
0 registered (), 218 Guests and 4 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#87676 - 04/08/04 01:22 PM Table 310.15(B)(6)
CTwireman Offline
Member

Registered: 02/07/02
Posts: 839
Loc: Connecticut, USA
Does table 310.15 B6 allow #2 Aluminum SER cable to be protected by a 100 amp breaker to feed a subpanel? (common practice around here)
By "subpanel", I mean a panel that is fed from the panel that contains the main disconnect.

I can't figure out if this table only applies to feeders between the main disconnect(s) and panelboard(s), or all feeders in a dwelling.

Feeder: "All circuit conductors between the service equipment....and the final branch circuit overcurrent device." (NFPA 70, 2002 Article 100 definition)



Peter
_________________________
Peter

Top
2014 / 2011 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
#87677 - 04/08/04 01:31 PM Re: Table 310.15(B)(6)
iwire Offline
Moderator

Registered: 01/05/03
Posts: 4343
Loc: North Attleboro, MA USA
Peter I will say yes to your question, but wait for other replies as this one confuses me too and I do not use this table at my work.

I base my answer on this part of 310.15(B)(6)

 Quote:
For application of this section, the main power feeder shall be the feeder(s) between the main disconnect and the lighting and appliance branch-circuit panelboard(s).


Notice the (s) on feeder and panelboard.

Bob
_________________________
Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts

Top
#87678 - 04/08/04 02:49 PM Re: Table 310.15(B)(6)
Ryan_J Offline
Moderator

Registered: 08/19/03
Posts: 1355
Loc: West Jordan, Utah, USA
In my opinion, you are correct (as is Bob).

I, like Bob, think the "main power feeder" must originate at the service equipment and end at a lighting and appliance panel. If you had a 200 amp panel (outside service equipment), it would be legal to feed an indoor panel with 4/0 AL, but it would be a violation to leave the interior panel and feed another panel with 2 AWG (unless the terminals were rated 75 degrees and you use the round-up rule). Once you have a feeder that originates outside of the service equipment, you are in the land of 310.16, not 310.15(B)(6).
_________________________
Ryan Jackson,
Salt Lake City

Top
#87679 - 04/08/04 03:03 PM Re: Table 310.15(B)(6)
Roger Offline
Member

Registered: 05/18/02
Posts: 1779
Loc: N.C.
Anything; be it a device, appliance, down stream panel, etc... fed from the lighting and appliance branch-circuit panelboard(s), will fall under "other" articles, and can not use 310.15(B)(6).

Here we go.

Roger

Top
#87680 - 04/08/04 03:11 PM Re: Table 310.15(B)(6)
iwire Offline
Moderator

Registered: 01/05/03
Posts: 4343
Loc: North Attleboro, MA USA
I say just remove Table 310.15(B)(6) and have us all use 310.16.

Bob
_________________________
Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts

Top
#87681 - 04/08/04 03:13 PM Re: Table 310.15(B)(6)
Ryan_J Offline
Moderator

Registered: 08/19/03
Posts: 1355
Loc: West Jordan, Utah, USA
I vote Bob for president
_________________________
Ryan Jackson,
Salt Lake City

Top
#87682 - 04/08/04 03:14 PM Re: Table 310.15(B)(6)
iwire Offline
Moderator

Registered: 01/05/03
Posts: 4343
Loc: North Attleboro, MA USA
You can not round up 90 amp rated 2 AWG AL to 100 amps as 90 amps is a standard size OCPD.
_________________________
Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts

Top
#87683 - 04/08/04 03:15 PM Re: Table 310.15(B)(6)
iwire Offline
Moderator

Registered: 01/05/03
Posts: 4343
Loc: North Attleboro, MA USA
Now I feel bad for my last post.:O

Bob
_________________________
Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts

Top
#87684 - 04/08/04 03:19 PM Re: Table 310.15(B)(6)
Roger Offline
Member

Registered: 05/18/02
Posts: 1779
Loc: N.C.
Bob,
 Quote:
Now I feel bad for my last post.:O
the truth hurts. I'm sure Ryan will still vote for you (maybe ), I know if you get 310.15(B)(6) removed (or my preference, have it reworded) I will.

Roger



[This message has been edited by Roger (edited 04-08-2004).]

Top
#87685 - 04/08/04 03:28 PM Re: Table 310.15(B)(6)
Ryan_J Offline
Moderator

Registered: 08/19/03
Posts: 1355
Loc: West Jordan, Utah, USA
 Quote:
You can not round up 90 amp rated 2 AWG AL to 100 amps as 90 amps is a standard size OCPD.


I didn't even look at 240.6, just assuming that 90 is an off the wall number and wouldn't be considered standard. One of these days I'm gonna stop shooting from the lip and start looking in the code before I post :0
_________________________
Ryan Jackson,
Salt Lake City

Top
Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 >



ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals