ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Admin 16
Recent Posts
fuse rejectors
by HotLine1. 03/24/17 07:53 AM
Another Forum Update
by Admin. 03/22/17 03:04 PM
Dining room plugs
by watersparkfalls. 03/21/17 10:31 PM
TRUE POWER
by jraef. 03/21/17 09:13 PM
WEG CFW-11 Frequency Inverter
by jraef. 03/21/17 08:50 PM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
231,315 Are you busy
166,048 Re: Forum
160,525 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
1 registered members (electure), 60 guests, and 10 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
#86895 - 12/22/03 02:28 PM NEC, Bring Back the old style smaller version!  
Joe Tedesco  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Boston, Massachusetts USA
I wish that NFPA would bring back the smaller version of the NEC.

I miss having that handy size!


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant

2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides

#86896 - 12/22/03 06:00 PM Re: NEC, Bring Back the old style smaller version!  
Electricmanscott  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,457
Holden, MA USA
Does this fall under "Old dogs new tricks?" [Linked Image] I like the new size. Anyone familiar with a Grainger catalog? I think the NEC would be getting close to that thickness if it was the old size.


#86897 - 12/22/03 06:39 PM Re: NEC, Bring Back the old style smaller version!  
earlydean  Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 751
Griswold, CT, USA
Either 3 inches thick, or print so small you need a magnifying glass to read it.


Earl

#86898 - 12/22/03 06:41 PM Re: NEC, Bring Back the old style smaller version!  
Ryan_J  Offline
Moderator
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,374
West Jordan, Utah, USA
Greetings Earl. Its good to see you here. You'll be a valued resource.


Ryan Jackson,
Salt Lake City

#86899 - 12/22/03 07:19 PM Re: NEC, Bring Back the old style smaller version!  
Bill Addiss  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,875
NY, USA
Joe,

Maybe the smaller book is easier to carry around, but the bigger format that lays flat is better for the office.

Ditto to Ryan's post
Welcome Earl!

[Linked Image]
Bill


#86900 - 12/22/03 07:21 PM Re: NEC, Bring Back the old style smaller version!  
Bill Addiss  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,875
NY, USA
PS, if it would be as thick as Graingers catalog forget what I said above.

[Linked Image]
Bill


#86901 - 12/22/03 08:32 PM Re: NEC, Bring Back the old style smaller version!  
Roger  Offline
Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,716
N.C.
I remember not thinking much of the new size when it came out in 99, but I've grown to appreciate it for the print size as I age. [Linked Image]

Thinking about it being the size of the Grainger catalog is really scary. [Linked Image] [Linked Image]

I would also like to say welcome to Earl.

Roger


#86902 - 12/22/03 09:47 PM Re: NEC, Bring Back the old style smaller version!  
macmikeman  Offline
Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 717
Honolulu, Hawaii
I wish the code book would revert back to the good ole days when I could size a conductor for a job by looking in one table for 3 current carrying wires in raceway, and not have to perform 3 seperate alternate calculations to get the best answer. Also I knew how many wires of type thhn for a given size fit into a 3/4" conduit by looking in one single spot in chapter 9. However if the old ways resulted in more fires across the country, then I guess its Aidios old friend, and on with the new.


#86903 - 12/23/03 07:38 AM Re: NEC, Bring Back the old style smaller version!  
sparky  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,303
maybe they could have a seperate book just for all the exceptions?


#86904 - 12/23/03 11:38 AM Re: NEC, Bring Back the old style smaller version!  
SvenNYC  Offline
Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,691
New York City
The 1999 NEC is the size of a phone book. I have the soft-cover version -- only type that was available for sale at the NYC Government bookstore plus the local ammendments.

[threadjack]
Has anyone ever written a "WHY" book on the NEC? As to why such and such a rule has been established?[/threadjack]


Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Member Spotlight
watersparkfalls
watersparkfalls
Washington...Not DC
Posts: 216
Joined: March 2005
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.022s Queries: 15 (0.004s) Memory: 0.8168 MB (Peak: 0.9910 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-03-24 14:04:49 UTC