ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#86072 - 09/05/03 01:15 PM Do you see any additional violations?
Joe Tedesco Offline
Member
Registered: 10/07/00
Posts: 2749
Loc: Boston, Massachusetts USA
The missing screw, and open knockout have been identified by the inspector, and the receptacle is secured with a single 6/32 screw.

The drill bit just happens to be sitting on top of the box.

Do you see any additional violations? If so, please cite the rule in the NEC.






[This message has been edited by Joe Tedesco (edited 09-06-2003).]
_________________________
Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
Top
2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
#86073 - 09/05/03 01:43 PM Re: Do you see any additional violations?
rmiell Offline
Member
Registered: 11/09/00
Posts: 242
Loc: La Junta, Co. USA
Since there is a commpression conduit fitting, I would think this is outdoors. It is not weatherproof, nor is the cover. Of course, since manufacturers do not make UL listed raintight compression connectors, this whole job is suspect. (Article 314.15(A))

Box fill might be exceeded, if more than 3 conductors are installed. (Article 314.16)

Is the box supported correctly? (Article 314.23 (A))

Now, where is that article about stupidity????

Rick
Top
#86074 - 09/05/03 02:14 PM Re: Do you see any additional violations?
Joe Tedesco Offline
Member
Registered: 10/07/00
Posts: 2749
Loc: Boston, Massachusetts USA
Rick:

I did not think about the box fill with the 2 wire device deduction in this octagon box.

If it had 2 - 12 AWG THW, for example, and the box was one of the sizes in the table how would we determne if it was too small?

I am pretty sure that this was in a hotel along a wall in an equipment room, and not out 0f doors, if it was I would have taken more pictures of it.

The connector issue is strange, and we have to be careful when they are used in locations that include those other than dry that are defined in Article 100 under "Locations"

The stupidity code? I think that is still being edited and maybe we can ask a few of the members here for some advice, or maybe they can direct us to a place were we can find rules that apply?

You still have one more item to identify before the Red Tag can be left on the Job .....
_________________________
Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
Top
#86075 - 09/05/03 02:30 PM Re: Do you see any additional violations?
Electricmanscott Offline
Member
Registered: 01/12/02
Posts: 1457
Loc: Holden, MA USA
This is obviously an old installation which was very common. Why are we applying current codes to this? Can I have my drill bit back now.
Top
#86076 - 09/05/03 03:06 PM Re: Do you see any additional violations?
resqcapt19 Offline
Member
Registered: 11/10/00
Posts: 2148
Loc: IL
Rick,
In my area compression type connectors are almost always because they are required by the job specs. It is a very rare set of specs that permit the use of set screw connectors and couplings.
Don
_________________________
Don(resqcapt19)
Top
#86077 - 09/05/03 03:09 PM Re: Do you see any additional violations?
wa2ise Offline
Member
Registered: 11/29/02
Posts: 782
Loc: Oradell NJ USA
Is there a green pigtail wire to tie the outlet's ground to the box?

And there's a missing screw that should be holding the cover to the box.
Top
#86078 - 09/05/03 03:17 PM Re: Do you see any additional violations?
ThinkGood Offline
Member
Registered: 08/07/02
Posts: 1081
Loc: Milwaukee, WI
Somebody knocked out a knockout and didn't un-knock it properly.

NEC 314.17(a)???


Oh, also, the device is upside-down

[This message has been edited by ThinkGood (edited 09-05-2003).]
Top
#86079 - 09/05/03 03:34 PM Re: Do you see any additional violations?
Joe Tedesco Offline
Member
Registered: 10/07/00
Posts: 2749
Loc: Boston, Massachusetts USA
Scott:

You are correct, but if the existing receptacle secured to this flat cover was replaced ..... could the

AHJ make you bring it up to the current code?

Then the greenEBJ, the screws to be more than one securing the receptacle to the cover would be violations.

The KO and missing screw were identified in the first post here.

The drill? That was BJ's and he borrowed it from Bill and Reno was looking for it too because he said that Sparky was using it to do work for Websparky and some of the other electricians in the UK, Belgan, Australia, and France!!

Who owns the drill bit??
_________________________
Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
Top
#86080 - 09/06/03 11:24 AM Re: Do you see any additional violations?
electure Offline


Member
Registered: 12/24/00
Posts: 4259
Loc: Fullerton, CA USA
Here's one that's a couple of shades of grey.
If it was installed by'02 Code, 406.4(C)..."shall be held rigidly against the cover by more than one screw..."
If by '99 Code, 410-56(f)(3)..."shall be secured by more than one screw"....
If by '96 Code, 410-56(i) only said "Receptacles installed in raised covers shall not be secured solely by a single screw".
This installation appears to be older than the '99 Code. So it wouldn't be subject to that rule.

The box is a 4"X1-1/2" octogonal. Even if the conductors were #10, the box has the necessary volume. (I also seem to remember that in the "bad old days", there was only a 1 conductor per device deduction made from the box fill)...S
Top
#86081 - 09/06/03 11:27 AM Re: Do you see any additional violations?
PCBelarge Offline
Member
Registered: 06/08/03
Posts: 681
Loc: Dobbs Ferry, NY, USA
One cannot rely on the fitting for continuity of the equipment ground when using a round box.

Pierre
_________________________
Pierre Belarge
Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >

Member Spotlight
Member Since: 11/17/00
Posts: 2232
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box


Who's Online
1 registered (annemarie1), 53 Guests and 9 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
 
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
 
Top Posters (30 Days)
Admin 47
HotLine1 43
gfretwell 19
Ruben Rocha 12
Trumpy 9
 
Newest Members
Scotto, Freecrowder, clee512, Jdscott2005, FAIZAN

ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals