The Electrical Contractor Network

ECN Electrical Forum
Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Books, Tools and Test Equipment for Electrical and Construction Trades

Register Now!

Register Now!

We want your input!

Featured:
   

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

   
Recent Posts
Industrail Control Panel bonding per 409.108
by sparkyinak
Yesterday at 03:17 PM
Calling all Non-US members!! (Non-US only)
by aussie240
12/07/16 02:39 AM
Photo Upload Tutorial
by DanK
12/06/16 11:35 PM
Sprinklered equipment 26-008
by bigpapa
12/02/16 04:24 PM
On Delay Relay with Auto Reset
by Potseal
12/01/16 09:59 AM
New in the Gallery:
12.5A through 0.75mm flex (just out of curiosity)
Shout Box

Top Posters (30 Days)
gfretwell 13
HotLine1 9
sparkyinak 8
Texas_Ranger 8
Potseal 6
Who's Online
0 registered (), 216 Guests and 5 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#84979 - 05/21/03 07:59 PM 93 NEC needed
Jim M Offline
Member

Registered: 08/10/01
Posts: 453
Loc: Chestertown, MD, USA
I have just started to deal with a jurisdiction that is still using the 93 NEC. I have misplaced my copy in the recent move. If anyone has one that they would like to sell please let me know.

Thanks for not laughing too hard.

Jim

Top
2014 / 2011 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
#84980 - 05/21/03 08:08 PM Re: 93 NEC needed
Ron Offline
Member

Registered: 03/13/02
Posts: 577
Loc: White Plains, NY
_________________________
Ron

Top
#84981 - 05/22/03 09:06 AM Re: 93 NEC needed
dana1028 Offline
Member

Registered: 01/09/02
Posts: 163
Loc: San Carlos, CA
Jim - just so you know...I spotted that eBay '93 a couple of days ago and plan on bidding on it as well. Been looking for a '93 for 'bout a month now.

[This message has been edited by dana1028 (edited 05-22-2003).]

Top
#84982 - 05/22/03 12:55 PM Re: 93 NEC needed
HotLine1 Offline

Member

Registered: 04/03/02
Posts: 6804
Loc: Brick, NJ USA
Guys:
I have a '93 Handbook, McGraw Hill/McPartland; if you're interested.
Probably have a '93 NEC at the shop
If ya want it let me know.
John
_________________________
John

Top
#84983 - 05/22/03 02:20 PM Re: 93 NEC needed
Jim M Offline
Member

Registered: 08/10/01
Posts: 453
Loc: Chestertown, MD, USA
John,

I will buy either one, but would prefer the Handbook. Let me know via email.

Thanks,
Jim

Top
#84984 - 05/22/03 03:14 PM Re: 93 NEC needed
rmiell Offline
Member

Registered: 11/09/00
Posts: 261
Loc: La Junta, Co. USA
As a contractor, why worry? Wire according to the 2002 NEC, and it, hopefully, will be in excess of that required in 1993. GFCIs within 6' of kitchen sink? 2002 is more strict. Ampacity of wire? Should be the same. etc............

Anyone think of a rule that would be a problem?

Rick Miell

Top
#84985 - 05/22/03 03:53 PM Re: 93 NEC needed
Jim M Offline
Member

Registered: 08/10/01
Posts: 453
Loc: Chestertown, MD, USA
Rick,

I have tried that approach. The head inspector says that to do something that is permitted by a later Code is a legal issue. He feels that it would be breaking the law and he will not open himself nor the inspection department up to a legal challenge. As far as he is concerned there is no Code past the 93.

I just tried to wire a hot tub using NM-B from the panel to the DC then PVC to the tub. No go, conduit all the way from the panel. No room to negotiate even though this would have been Code compliant under the 02.

I also believe that the circuit requirements for bathrooms are significantly different.

[This message has been edited by Jim M (edited 05-22-2003).]

Top
#84986 - 05/23/03 05:56 PM Re: 93 NEC needed
Nick Offline
Member

Registered: 08/13/01
Posts: 603
Loc: Riverside, CA
Rick,
One issue that comes to mind is supporting boxes in t-bar ceilings. If memory serves me correctly, there was a drastic change between the ’96 and ’99 codes. The ’96 required rigid support of boxes and it could not be attached to the ceiling system. The ’99 allowed the use of ceiling wire support provided it was attached to the ceiling system. I don’t have these code books with me to check but that’s how I remember it. This would be a case of the later code making things more lenient and a possible problem with Jim M’s AHJ.

Top
#84987 - 06/01/03 08:09 PM Re: 93 NEC needed
Steve T Offline
Member

Registered: 02/14/01
Posts: 312
Loc: Oak Park, IL, USA
Jim,

you can always exceed the code without there being a legal problem. Later codes will not be less stringent than older codes.

Is the inspector going to tell you that you can't install a separate 20 amp circuit for the bathroom because the 93 code doesn't say so?

Top



ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals