The Electrical Contractor Network

ECN Electrical Forum
Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Books, Tools and Test Equipment for Electrical and Construction Trades

Register Now!

Register Now!

We want your input!


2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Recent Posts
Sprinklered equipment 26-008
by bigpapa
12/02/16 04:24 PM
On Delay Relay with Auto Reset
by Potseal
12/01/16 09:59 AM
Wow, that was close!
by jraef
11/28/16 07:06 PM
Earthquake in New Zeeland
11/27/16 11:25 PM
Calling all Non-US members!! (Non-US only)
by Tjia1981
11/27/16 06:33 AM
New in the Gallery:
12.5A through 0.75mm˛ flex (just out of curiosity)
Shout Box

Top Posters (30 Days)
gfretwell 13
HotLine1 9
Texas_Ranger 8
sparkyinak 7
Trumpy 6
Who's Online
0 registered (), 137 Guests and 5 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#83999 - 02/25/03 10:51 AM next higher breaker
dana1028 Offline

Registered: 01/09/02
Posts: 163
Loc: San Carlos, CA
(1999 NEC) 240-3(b) is the "next higher breaker" allowed code section.

My code book is full of margin notes from various code classes and I see a note here: 'for branch circuits, not feeders'.

?? - I don't remember not being allowed to use the next higher breaker for feeders (I'm thinking for sub-panels). Is there somewhere in the code that prohibits the 'next higher breaker' on feeders to sub-panels?

2014 / 2011 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
#84000 - 02/25/03 11:05 AM Re: next higher breaker
caselec Offline

Registered: 04/14/02
Posts: 557
Loc: San Jose, CA
You are allowed to use the next higher standard overcurrent device rating for feeders but not for multioutlet branch circuits feeding cord and plug connected loads. 240.4(B)(1)

Curt Swartz

#84001 - 02/25/03 11:30 AM Re: next higher breaker
Elzappr Offline

Registered: 12/20/01
Posts: 273
Loc: Oregon
In the 2002 code, art 240.4(C), when the overcurrent device is over 800A, then you have to use wire with allowable ampacity equal to or greater than the OC device rating. Maybe this is what your notes referred to...but this isn't likely something that applies to subpanels.

#84002 - 02/25/03 12:02 PM Re: next higher breaker
wdelbusto Offline
Junior Member

Registered: 02/25/03
Posts: 3
Loc: Miami
Caselec gave the correct answer, the question dana1028 asked refers to OC/brakers etc.. and never mentioned wire size.?


[This message has been edited by wdelbusto (edited 02-25-2003).]

#84003 - 02/25/03 01:55 PM Re: next higher breaker
The Watt Doctor Offline

Registered: 12/23/01
Posts: 443
Loc: Mont Belvieu, TX
The "general rule" (for lack of a better term) is that you "go up" on branch circuits, and "down" on feeders. Elzappr is correct in stating the "800 amp" rule. At 800 amps and above the ampacity of the wire has to match or exceed the OCP. Notice the NEC Handbook.
Table 210.24 summarizes the requirements for the size of conductors and the size of the overcurrent protection for branch circuits where two or more outlets are required. The first footnote also indicates that the wire sizes are for copper conductors. Section 210.3 indicates that branch-circuit conductors rated 15, 20, 30, 40, and 50 amperes must be protected at their ratings. Section 210.19(A) requires that branch-circuit conductors have an ampacity not less than the rating of the branch circuit and not less than the maximum load to be served. These specific requirements take precedence over 240.4(B), which applies generally.

Table 210.24 summarizes branch-circuit requirements of conductors, overcurrent protection, outlet devices, maximum load, and permissible load where two or more outlets are supplied.
If the branch circuit serves a fixture load and supplies two or more fixture outlets, 210.23 requires the branch circuit to have a specific ampere rating that is based on the rating of the overcurrent device, as stated in 210.3. Thus, if the circuit breaker that protects the branch circuit is rated 20 amperes, the conductors supplying this circuit must have an ampacity not less than 20 amperes.

Good Luck,
The Watt Doctor
Altura Cogen
Channelview, TX

#84004 - 02/25/03 02:39 PM Re: next higher breaker
dana1028 Offline

Registered: 01/09/02
Posts: 163
Loc: San Carlos, CA
thanks all - your comments are how I have understood it for years...just that comment in the margins threw me...don't know how that got there.


ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals