ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Admin 16
Recent Posts
fuse rejectors
by gfretwell. 03/23/17 01:12 PM
Another Forum Update
by Admin. 03/22/17 03:04 PM
Dining room plugs
by watersparkfalls. 03/21/17 10:31 PM
TRUE POWER
by jraef. 03/21/17 09:13 PM
WEG CFW-11 Frequency Inverter
by jraef. 03/21/17 08:50 PM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
231,245 Are you busy
165,957 Re: Forum
160,481 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 57 guests, and 10 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
#83995 - 02/25/03 11:55 AM Would This Be True Today?  
rowdyrudy  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 169
Mascoutah, IL USA
This happened quite a few years ago (I seem to recall about 1966-67).
On a Chevron Chemical Co. site in TN, a 5kv direct burial cable was installed in PVC by the EC. Burial depth was 48”. He felt he was doing the owner a favor in that the cable could be replaced with ease. A few years later, the cable failed. When the lawyers got through, the EC, an upper medium size, was forced out of business. The bottom line was even though the owner OK’ed the installation the EC was liable as he should have known that the amp capacity of the cable buried in earth depended upon the effects of the earth being in contact with the cable. The installation in raceway derated the ampacity of the cable.

Rowdy


2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides

#83996 - 02/25/03 03:17 PM Re: Would This Be True Today?  
Elzappr  Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 270
Oregon
Sure looks like it could happen today too. Looking at the code tables for medium voltage cable directly burried, there's lots of language about arrangement, ambient earth temperatue, thermal resistance, and conductor temperature....so how could anyone put direct burial cable in PVC without noticing such concerns?
Back in the 60's the code book (including Article 710) didn't have such language, and applying medium voltage cable would require some concern for what the cable manufacturer had to say about how it was used. There had to be SOME info about the ampacity of the cable...it certainly wasn't included in the code book...and so there must have been something printed up about it by the manufacturer or supplier. I'm amazed that the contractor didn't research this more.


#83997 - 02/25/03 05:07 PM Re: Would This Be True Today?  
sparky  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,303
moral of the story, don't do favors.

especially for the oilocracy
[Linked Image]


#83998 - 02/27/03 11:07 PM Re: Would This Be True Today?  
Steve T  Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 306
Oak Park, IL, USA
Couldn't the contractor just replace the cable for free since he made it so easy for himself to do by installing PVC?



Member Spotlight
AllClear
AllClear
Belmond Iowa US
Posts: 44
Joined: August 2005
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.010s Queries: 14 (0.002s) Memory: 0.7579 MB (Peak: 0.8889 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-03-23 22:10:38 UTC