The Electrical Contractor Network

ECN Electrical Forum
Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Books, Tools and Test Equipment for Electrical and Construction Trades

Register Now!

Register Now!

We want your input!

Featured:
   

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

   
Recent Posts
Sprinklered equipment 26-008
by bigpapa
Today at 04:24 PM
On Delay Relay with Auto Reset
by Potseal
Yesterday at 09:59 AM
Wow, that was close!
by jraef
11/28/16 07:06 PM
Earthquake in New Zeeland
by RODALCO
11/27/16 11:25 PM
Calling all Non-US members!! (Non-US only)
by Tjia1981
11/27/16 06:33 AM
New in the Gallery:
12.5A through 0.75mm flex (just out of curiosity)
Shout Box

Top Posters (30 Days)
gfretwell 15
HotLine1 10
Texas_Ranger 8
Trumpy 8
sparkyinak 7
Who's Online
0 registered (), 202 Guests and 7 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#83995 - 02/25/03 07:55 AM Would This Be True Today?
rowdyrudy Offline
Member

Registered: 11/02/02
Posts: 171
Loc: Mascoutah, IL USA
This happened quite a few years ago (I seem to recall about 1966-67).
On a Chevron Chemical Co. site in TN, a 5kv direct burial cable was installed in PVC by the EC. Burial depth was 48”. He felt he was doing the owner a favor in that the cable could be replaced with ease. A few years later, the cable failed. When the lawyers got through, the EC, an upper medium size, was forced out of business. The bottom line was even though the owner OK’ed the installation the EC was liable as he should have known that the amp capacity of the cable buried in earth depended upon the effects of the earth being in contact with the cable. The installation in raceway derated the ampacity of the cable.

Rowdy

Top
2014 / 2011 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
#83996 - 02/25/03 11:17 AM Re: Would This Be True Today?
Elzappr Offline
Member

Registered: 12/20/01
Posts: 273
Loc: Oregon
Sure looks like it could happen today too. Looking at the code tables for medium voltage cable directly burried, there's lots of language about arrangement, ambient earth temperatue, thermal resistance, and conductor temperature....so how could anyone put direct burial cable in PVC without noticing such concerns?
Back in the 60's the code book (including Article 710) didn't have such language, and applying medium voltage cable would require some concern for what the cable manufacturer had to say about how it was used. There had to be SOME info about the ampacity of the cable...it certainly wasn't included in the code book...and so there must have been something printed up about it by the manufacturer or supplier. I'm amazed that the contractor didn't research this more.

Top
#83997 - 02/25/03 01:07 PM Re: Would This Be True Today?
sparky Offline
Member

Registered: 10/18/00
Posts: 5545
moral of the story, don't do favors.

especially for the oilocracy

Top
#83998 - 02/27/03 07:07 PM Re: Would This Be True Today?
Steve T Offline
Member

Registered: 02/14/01
Posts: 312
Loc: Oak Park, IL, USA
Couldn't the contractor just replace the cable for free since he made it so easy for himself to do by installing PVC?

Top



ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals