The Electrical Contractor Network

ECN Electrical Forum
Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Books, Tools and Test Equipment for Electrical and Construction Trades

Register Now!

Register Now!

We want your input!


2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Recent Posts
Parking lot pole light swap....
by gfretwell
10/24/16 08:46 PM
International Wire Colour Codes
by Tjia1981
10/23/16 12:08 PM
Son of Sparky
by HotLine1
10/20/16 07:43 PM
Speaking of Plugmold ...
by gfretwell
10/17/16 02:37 PM
Broken battery charger? Check for cobwebs!
by gfretwell
10/17/16 02:30 PM
New in the Gallery:
12.5A through 0.75mm flex (just out of curiosity)
Shout Box

Top Posters (30 Days)
gfretwell 14
ghost307 7
HotLine1 7
renosteinke 6
Potseal 4
Who's Online
2 registered (HotLine1, gfretwell), 304 Guests and 6 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#83995 - 02/25/03 07:55 AM Would This Be True Today?
rowdyrudy Offline

Registered: 11/02/02
Posts: 171
Loc: Mascoutah, IL USA
This happened quite a few years ago (I seem to recall about 1966-67).
On a Chevron Chemical Co. site in TN, a 5kv direct burial cable was installed in PVC by the EC. Burial depth was 48”. He felt he was doing the owner a favor in that the cable could be replaced with ease. A few years later, the cable failed. When the lawyers got through, the EC, an upper medium size, was forced out of business. The bottom line was even though the owner OK’ed the installation the EC was liable as he should have known that the amp capacity of the cable buried in earth depended upon the effects of the earth being in contact with the cable. The installation in raceway derated the ampacity of the cable.


2014 / 2011 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
#83996 - 02/25/03 11:17 AM Re: Would This Be True Today?
Elzappr Offline

Registered: 12/20/01
Posts: 273
Loc: Oregon
Sure looks like it could happen today too. Looking at the code tables for medium voltage cable directly burried, there's lots of language about arrangement, ambient earth temperatue, thermal resistance, and conductor how could anyone put direct burial cable in PVC without noticing such concerns?
Back in the 60's the code book (including Article 710) didn't have such language, and applying medium voltage cable would require some concern for what the cable manufacturer had to say about how it was used. There had to be SOME info about the ampacity of the certainly wasn't included in the code book...and so there must have been something printed up about it by the manufacturer or supplier. I'm amazed that the contractor didn't research this more.

#83997 - 02/25/03 01:07 PM Re: Would This Be True Today?
sparky Offline

Registered: 10/18/00
Posts: 5545
moral of the story, don't do favors.

especially for the oilocracy

#83998 - 02/27/03 07:07 PM Re: Would This Be True Today?
Steve T Offline

Registered: 02/14/01
Posts: 312
Loc: Oak Park, IL, USA
Couldn't the contractor just replace the cable for free since he made it so easy for himself to do by installing PVC?


ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals