ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Admin 16
Recent Posts
fuse rejectors
by gfretwell. 03/23/17 01:12 PM
Another Forum Update
by Admin. 03/22/17 03:04 PM
Dining room plugs
by watersparkfalls. 03/21/17 10:31 PM
TRUE POWER
by jraef. 03/21/17 09:13 PM
WEG CFW-11 Frequency Inverter
by jraef. 03/21/17 08:50 PM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
231,283 Are you busy
165,995 Re: Forum
160,504 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
1 registered members (gfretwell), 60 guests, and 13 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4
#83841 - 02/23/03 11:59 AM Teaching the NEC and Electrical Safdety, It is Not Easy!!  
Joe Tedesco  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Boston, Massachusetts USA
What are your thoughts when it comes to teaching the NEC?

[This message has been edited by Joe Tedesco (edited 02-23-2003).]


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant

2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides

#83842 - 02/23/03 01:14 PM Re: Teaching the NEC and Electrical Safdety, It is Not Easy!!  
sparky  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,303
Joe,
i tire of the NEC's black/white doctrine, and the AHJ's captivity to it, as much of the NEC is without a shred of rationale

perhaps the answer is not the literal interpetation of each vowel & constonant of the NEC, but the efficy of the end result.


#83843 - 02/23/03 01:29 PM Re: Teaching the NEC and Electrical Safdety, It is Not Easy!!  
iwire  Offline
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
North Attleboro, MA USA
Sparky,
How do enforce the code if not to the letter, one persons idea of common sense is not the same as someone eles's, or do we just call you for your common sense.

Can you give an example of "much of the NEC is without a shred of rationale"

Bob


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts

#83844 - 02/23/03 02:16 PM Re: Teaching the NEC and Electrical Safdety, It is Not Easy!!  
Elzappr  Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 270
Oregon
As an apprentice instructor I had to deal with several instances where a student pressed for clarification beyond everyone's social comfort level. I appreciated the fact that the class atmosphere was comfortable enough so that any studend felt free to speak their mind, and I tried --quite successfully, I suppose ;-) -- to not act like I knew it all, so that my vulnerability served as an invitation for them to challenge anything I might declare. I learned that the difficulties were visualization ones or simple sematic ones. The students take an indignant exception to anything that violates common sense. So, all that is needed is a clearer picture, so that the meaning is less reliant on words, but more on what they can see. Once I'm sure they were imaging the issue the same as me, then we could work on why the words were selected as they were.
I've never had a student dis me in any serious way, as long as I show that I respect that they are doing the best they can, with the imaginative tools they have available at the time.

There ARE times when people can flame a situation just for their own sick amusement though. I was at one conference where a guy was drunk, and belligerant, and was looking to stir up trouble. I guess that sort of thing has to be expected to eventually occur.

I suppose the foregoing just highlighted what the previous posters to this thread brought up. There's plenty of authoritative voice but little in interpretative nuance in a lot of code issues discussions, and that only serves to show disrespect to the free thinking, imaginative efforts of those who are trying to get a grip on what the code is about. As an instructor, I have found out that it is real easy to explain just what I understand, just the rationale that I think is behind a code article, and then quickly shift discussion before someone mulls it over and seeks clarification about grey areas where I have no ready answer. Such class manipulation is obvious to some of the sharper students, and they might not be willing to be dismissed so easily.


#83845 - 02/23/03 02:52 PM Re: Teaching the NEC and Electrical Safdety, It is Not Easy!!  
Joe Tedesco  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Boston, Massachusetts USA
If you have questions about the code and its content you can ask for a Formal Interpretation!

Quote
90.6 Formal Interpretations.

To promote uniformity of interpretation and application of the provisions of this Code, formal interpretation procedures have been established and are found in the NFPA Regulations Governing Committee Projects.





[This message has been edited by Joe Tedesco (edited 02-23-2003).]


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant

#83846 - 02/23/03 03:15 PM Re: Teaching the NEC and Electrical Safdety, It is Not Easy!!  
WebSparky  Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 138
Cleveland, Ohio
Hi Joe,

Here is a code "common sense" question that was posed several years ago at a code class I was attending.

NEC 2002 358.30(A)and(B)

ie.
A breaker panel is mounted to a wall on 3/4" plywood and 16" to the right at the same elevation is a lighting contactor. The two are connected with 3/4" EMT. The length of the EMT is 16".

Does this piece of raceway need to be supported according to the NEC?

The way I read the code says that it is required.

What say you?


Dave

#83847 - 02/23/03 03:27 PM Re: Teaching the NEC and Electrical Safdety, It is Not Easy!!  
sparky  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,303
I see i've aggitated the 'instructors' here, which is not my intent.

The NEC is far from perfect, and all the ROP's we can muster won't create a document applicable to everyone in every situation.

There are many arbitrary figures that exist in it simply due to member(s) in past history agreeing to a given figure.

i believe it was Mr.John Caloggero who brought up the rule of 6 in the MH forum as one of these.

another is 376.22's magic '30' , to which our Canadian counterparts have 200

many other examples exist without engineered figures to back them up

So you are right in that you can only reasonably enforce to the code's letter, and many on the BB's express this to extreeme degrees Bob

But do not expect our trade to blindly accept these naked king doctrines without being somewhat inquisitive.

Which is why some diplomacy may be appropo (i'm allowed to quote myself here right?) [Linked Image]

Quote
the efficy of the end result.


translation;
"what is the better job?"


#83848 - 02/23/03 03:28 PM Re: Teaching the NEC and Electrical Safdety, It is Not Easy!!  
Joe Tedesco  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Boston, Massachusetts USA
Elzappr

I am sure that in your area up in the NW that the instruction must be performed by those who are qualified to teach, and I appreciate you reply.

When do you hold your classes?


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant

#83849 - 02/23/03 03:35 PM Re: Teaching the NEC and Electrical Safdety, It is Not Easy!!  
Joe Tedesco  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Boston, Massachusetts USA
WebSparky

Quote
The way I read the code says that it is required.

What say you?


I agree! It is required, but I would sleep and not flinch an eye if it was not supported. I'll use common sense sometimes too!


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant

#83850 - 02/23/03 04:05 PM Re: Teaching the NEC and Electrical Safdety, It is Not Easy!!  
ga.sparky56  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 558
young harris georgia usa
The question I am most often asked by homeowners and GC's alike is WHY? A lot of times I, as I suspect others are,are put in the position of being contractor/electrician/ahj all rolled into 1 due to lack of an ahj.At times,quoting dry code does me no good if I can't back it up with reasoning.This is why I come here and continue to be a student and learn.Any suggestions other than keep trying to learn? Russell


Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4

Member Spotlight
dougwells
dougwells
kamloops BC Canada
Posts: 1,137
Joined: May 2003
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.023s Queries: 15 (0.004s) Memory: 0.8214 MB (Peak: 0.9970 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-03-24 06:12:34 UTC