The Electrical Contractor Network

ECN Electrical Forum
Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Books, Tools and Test Equipment for Electrical and Construction Trades

Register Now!

Register Now!

We want your input!

Featured:
   

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

   
Recent Posts
Industrail Control Panel bonding per 409.108
by sparkyinak
Yesterday at 03:17 PM
Calling all Non-US members!! (Non-US only)
by aussie240
12/07/16 02:39 AM
Photo Upload Tutorial
by DanK
12/06/16 11:35 PM
Sprinklered equipment 26-008
by bigpapa
12/02/16 04:24 PM
On Delay Relay with Auto Reset
by Potseal
12/01/16 09:59 AM
New in the Gallery:
12.5A through 0.75mm˛ flex (just out of curiosity)
Shout Box

Top Posters (30 Days)
gfretwell 13
HotLine1 9
sparkyinak 8
Texas_Ranger 8
Potseal 6
Who's Online
0 registered (), 216 Guests and 5 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#83097 - 01/09/03 05:07 PM Inspectors strange interpretation
Roger Offline
Member

Registered: 05/18/02
Posts: 1779
Loc: N.C.
I posted this at the M.H. forum also.

Talking to another electrician today who works in another area.

He tells me there is an inspector in this area, who says, when using NM in a commercial building, the NM in attics and basements must be enclosed on both sides, within 15 minute finish rating in living area and attic or basement area.

He said the inspector is using (twisting in my oppinion) the wording of 334.10(3).

I proceeded to tell him I was glad we do zilch in NM work and don't work in this area.

After thinking about it,I thought I would see what oppinions would come up here.

Roger

Top
2014 / 2011 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
#83098 - 01/09/03 06:51 PM Re: Inspectors strange interpretation
spyder Offline
Member

Registered: 10/14/02
Posts: 211
Loc: Massachusetts
I have never run into this before, but he may have a point after reading 334.10(3). Learn something new everyday. I almost always use MC cable anyway for commercial.

Top
#83099 - 01/13/03 01:31 PM Re: Inspectors strange interpretation
sparky Offline
Member

Registered: 10/18/00
Posts: 5545
requiring all residential basements to have a 15 min. fire rating would be a stretch...but what trade would he come down on?

Top
#83100 - 01/13/03 07:06 PM Re: Inspectors strange interpretation
rmiell Offline
Member

Registered: 11/09/00
Posts: 261
Loc: La Junta, Co. USA
Why on both sides? Doesn't 1/2" sheetrock provide a 15 minute rating? Or is it 3/4"? Either way, if this rated material meets the requirement of a 15 minute barrier, anything on the other side has no effect.

Rick Miell

Top
#83101 - 01/15/03 05:13 PM Re: Inspectors strange interpretation
HotLine1 Offline

Member

Registered: 04/03/02
Posts: 6804
Loc: Brick, NJ USA
Clue me in guys:
Quote from above:
"He tells me there is an inspector in this area, who says, when using NM in a commercial building, the NM in attics and basements must be enclosed on both sides, within 15 minute finish rating in living area and attic or basement area."

Are we saying above that the ceilings must be 15 min. fire rated: and the "floors have to be 15 min fire rated also??

Or to put it another way:
OPen joist ceilings, or attic floors CANNOT have NMC wiring???

1/2" sheetrock is at least a 15 min fire rating. 2 layers of 5/8" make a 1 hour wall I believe. Tommorow, I have to ask the Building Inspector, and the Electric Sub-Code Official (Head Inspector) for clarifications.

John
_________________________
John

Top
#83102 - 01/16/03 01:35 PM Re: Inspectors strange interpretation
sparky Offline
Member

Registered: 10/18/00
Posts: 5545
well good luck John,
somehow insinuating mc cable for residential wiring reeks of that steel tube institute's vengance on the 3 strory nm deal....

Top
#83103 - 01/16/03 07:31 PM Re: Inspectors strange interpretation
HotLine1 Offline

Member

Registered: 04/03/02
Posts: 6804
Loc: Brick, NJ USA
The clarifications will have to wait until Tuesday evening, as both gentlemen where "out" today, & I don't go back 'till Tuesday
John
_________________________
John

Top
#83104 - 01/17/03 05:06 PM Re: Inspectors strange interpretation
Roger Offline
Member

Registered: 05/18/02
Posts: 1779
Loc: N.C.
I hate it when somebody or an inspector uses (in their oppinion) the "thats not the intent" clause.

But in this case, the pure wording of 334.10{3}, IMO, is not the intent.

Roger

Top
#83105 - 01/19/03 02:21 PM Re: Inspectors strange interpretation
harold endean Offline
Member

Registered: 02/16/02
Posts: 2248
Loc: Boonton, NJ
I am reading the IAEI "Analysis of the 2002 NEC" book and on page 185 in reference to 334.10 it says "Type NM, Type NMC and Type NMS cables shall be permitted to be used in the following:

(1) One- and Two-family dwellings.

(2) Multifamily dwellings permitted to be of Types III, IV, and V construction except as prohibited in 334.12

(3) Other structures permitted to be of Types III, IV, and Type V construction except as prohibitied in 334.12. Cables shall be concealed within walls, floors or ceilings that provide a thermal barrier of material that has at least a 15-minute rating as identified in listings of fire-rated assemblies."


Does this help?

Top
#83106 - 01/19/03 05:23 PM Re: Inspectors strange interpretation
sparky Offline
Member

Registered: 10/18/00
Posts: 5545
a 15 min f-rating to protect the dwelling or the dwellings occupants??

Top
Page 1 of 2 1 2 >



ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals