ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Admin 16
Recent Posts
fuse rejectors
by HotLine1. 03/24/17 07:53 AM
Another Forum Update
by Admin. 03/22/17 03:04 PM
Dining room plugs
by watersparkfalls. 03/21/17 10:31 PM
TRUE POWER
by jraef. 03/21/17 09:13 PM
WEG CFW-11 Frequency Inverter
by jraef. 03/21/17 08:50 PM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
231,308 Are you busy
166,041 Re: Forum
160,519 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
1 registered members (HotLine1), 52 guests, and 11 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
#82659 - 12/06/02 10:01 AM Table 392.9  
Bobby Mercier  Offline
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 7
St-Georges,Quebec,Canada
Does this table meen that i dont have to derate my motors cables (3 conductors MC cable with a PVC jacket) if i respect Table 392.9 fill area for cable tray

Bobby Mercier



[This message has been edited by Bobby Mercier (edited 12-06-2002).]


2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides

#82660 - 12/06/02 03:16 PM Re: Table 392.9  
Redsy  Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,056
Bucks County PA
I don't believe it alleviates the requirement to derate any more than observing conduit fill allowances would.
However, as pointed out in the other posting, the spacing question rears it's ugly head.



Member Spotlight
electure
electure
Fullerton, CA USA
Posts: 4,259
Joined: December 2000
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.011s Queries: 14 (0.003s) Memory: 0.7411 MB (Peak: 0.8572 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-03-24 12:09:16 UTC