The Electrical Contractor Network

ECN Electrical Forum
Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Books, Tools and Test Equipment for Electrical and Construction Trades

Register Now!

Register Now!

We want your input!


2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Recent Posts
Parking lot pole light swap....
by HotLine1
Today at 09:39 AM
International Wire Colour Codes
by Texas_Ranger
Yesterday at 08:24 AM
Son of Sparky
by HotLine1
10/20/16 07:43 PM
Speaking of Plugmold ...
by gfretwell
10/17/16 02:37 PM
Broken battery charger? Check for cobwebs!
by gfretwell
10/17/16 02:30 PM
New in the Gallery:
12.5A through 0.75mm˛ flex (just out of curiosity)
Shout Box

Top Posters (30 Days)
gfretwell 12
HotLine1 7
renosteinke 6
ghost307 5
Potseal 4
Who's Online
2 registered (Tjia1981, geoff in UK), 225 Guests and 4 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#82659 - 12/06/02 06:01 AM Table 392.9
Bobby Mercier Offline
Junior Member

Registered: 11/28/02
Posts: 7
Loc: St-Georges,Quebec,Canada
Does this table meen that i dont have to derate my motors cables (3 conductors MC cable with a PVC jacket) if i respect Table 392.9 fill area for cable tray

Bobby Mercier

[This message has been edited by Bobby Mercier (edited 12-06-2002).]

2014 / 2011 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
#82660 - 12/06/02 11:16 AM Re: Table 392.9
Redsy Offline

Registered: 03/28/01
Posts: 2138
Loc: Bucks County PA
I don't believe it alleviates the requirement to derate any more than observing conduit fill allowances would.
However, as pointed out in the other posting, the spacing question rears it's ugly head.


ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals