The Electrical Contractor Network

ECN Electrical Forum
Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Books, Tools and Test Equipment for Electrical and Construction Trades

Register Now!

Register Now!

We want your input!

Featured:
   

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

   
Recent Posts
Industrail Control Panel bonding per 409.108
by sparkyinak
Yesterday at 03:17 PM
Calling all Non-US members!! (Non-US only)
by aussie240
12/07/16 02:39 AM
Photo Upload Tutorial
by DanK
12/06/16 11:35 PM
Sprinklered equipment 26-008
by bigpapa
12/02/16 04:24 PM
On Delay Relay with Auto Reset
by Potseal
12/01/16 09:59 AM
New in the Gallery:
12.5A through 0.75mm˛ flex (just out of curiosity)
Shout Box

Top Posters (30 Days)
gfretwell 13
HotLine1 9
Texas_Ranger 8
sparkyinak 8
Trumpy 6
Who's Online
0 registered (), 202 Guests and 6 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#81671 - 09/05/02 06:58 PM 300-4d
Vic S Offline
Junior Member

Registered: 09/05/02
Posts: 2
Here's the dilemna: 300-4d of the NEC requires protection of NM sheathed cable and MC cable within 1/1/4" of the edge of a stud where the conductors are LIKELY to be penetrated. The local AHJ's are requiring nail plates behind the conductors on a 3-1/2" stud wall where the non-metallic sheathed cable enters a plastic box in a typical residence. I hope you got that. In other words, not only where a cable is perpindicular to a stud and the clearance is less than 1-1/4", but also where the cable enters the box, because this space could be as little as 1/4". The inspectors are reading the intent in the 99 handbook and not the literal sense of the word. Is anybody in the country having to protect the back of a box where the cable enters it with nail plates and does anybody agree with this? Please respond to this. Florida enforces only the 1999 NEC with no exceptions in accordance with the Florida Building Code.

Top
2014 / 2011 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
#81672 - 09/05/02 07:39 PM Re: 300-4d
arseegee Offline
Member

Registered: 01/28/02
Posts: 321
Loc: Statesboro, GA USA
I have heard some good ones, but that one will go on my top ten. What's next, RMC for residential. Gimme a break. Perhaps you might want to run some stud guards across the breakers too, just incase they decide to hang a picture there.

Top
#81673 - 09/06/02 02:46 AM Re: 300-4d
Vic S Offline
Junior Member

Registered: 09/05/02
Posts: 2
Thanks for that response. Is anybody else out there? I suppose nobody else has heard that?

Top
#81674 - 09/06/02 04:07 AM Re: 300-4d
sparky Offline
Member

Registered: 10/18/00
Posts: 5545
yes i've heard of it....

as a matter of fact the boxes themselves have been questioned as to being unapplicable, in lieu of 4 sq's with sidestraps....

are not a few nailplates are really a small price to pay for thier silence?

Top
#81675 - 09/06/02 05:23 AM Re: 300-4d
Bill Addiss Offline
Member

Registered: 10/07/00
Posts: 4196
Loc: NY, USA
Vic,

I'm here, and have wondered about this very thing myself, but have never heard of additional protection being required by anyone. Perhaps you could send the Manufacturers an email and ask them why they put the holes where they do. I think we'd all be interested in hearing the answer if you get one.

Bill

Top



ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals