The Electrical Contractor Network

ECN Electrical Forum
Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Books, Tools and Test Equipment for Electrical and Construction Trades

Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Recent Posts
Members: Did you know?
by Admin
37 minutes 25 seconds ago
Safety at heights?
by HotLine1
Yesterday at 08:51 PM
International Wire Colour Codes
by Texas_Ranger
Yesterday at 03:29 PM
Looking for older post
by Texas_Ranger
Yesterday at 03:22 PM
Last time to chat here
by Trumpy
01/20/17 11:41 PM
New in the Gallery:
Desk-mounted "power-board"
Shout Box

Top Posters (30 Days)
Admin 36
HotLine1 20
Ruben Rocha 17
gfretwell 16
Trumpy 15
Who's Online
1 registered (Admin), 81 Guests and 10 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#81671 - 09/05/02 06:58 PM 300-4d
Vic S Offline
Junior Member
Registered: 09/05/02
Posts: 2
Here's the dilemna: 300-4d of the NEC requires protection of NM sheathed cable and MC cable within 1/1/4" of the edge of a stud where the conductors are LIKELY to be penetrated. The local AHJ's are requiring nail plates behind the conductors on a 3-1/2" stud wall where the non-metallic sheathed cable enters a plastic box in a typical residence. I hope you got that. In other words, not only where a cable is perpindicular to a stud and the clearance is less than 1-1/4", but also where the cable enters the box, because this space could be as little as 1/4". The inspectors are reading the intent in the 99 handbook and not the literal sense of the word. Is anybody in the country having to protect the back of a box where the cable enters it with nail plates and does anybody agree with this? Please respond to this. Florida enforces only the 1999 NEC with no exceptions in accordance with the Florida Building Code.
Top
2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
#81672 - 09/05/02 07:39 PM Re: 300-4d
arseegee Offline
Member
Registered: 01/28/02
Posts: 321
Loc: Statesboro, GA USA
I have heard some good ones, but that one will go on my top ten. What's next, RMC for residential. Gimme a break. Perhaps you might want to run some stud guards across the breakers too, just incase they decide to hang a picture there.
Top
#81673 - 09/06/02 02:46 AM Re: 300-4d
Vic S Offline
Junior Member
Registered: 09/05/02
Posts: 2
Thanks for that response. Is anybody else out there? I suppose nobody else has heard that?
Top
#81674 - 09/06/02 04:07 AM Re: 300-4d
sparky Offline
Member
Registered: 10/18/00
Posts: 5545
yes i've heard of it....

as a matter of fact the boxes themselves have been questioned as to being unapplicable, in lieu of 4 sq's with sidestraps....

are not a few nailplates are really a small price to pay for thier silence?
Top
#81675 - 09/06/02 05:23 AM Re: 300-4d
Bill Addiss Offline
Member
Registered: 10/07/00
Posts: 4196
Loc: NY, USA
Vic,

I'm here, and have wondered about this very thing myself, but have never heard of additional protection being required by anyone. Perhaps you could send the Manufacturers an email and ask them why they put the holes where they do. I think we'd all be interested in hearing the answer if you get one.

Bill
Top


ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals