ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Admin 19
Recent Posts
NFPA stuff
by gfretwell. 03/28/17 08:08 PM
Anyone hiring inspectors?
by HotLine1. 03/27/17 08:03 AM
Old decora style outlets
by Admin. 03/25/17 11:40 AM
ESA Arc flash course
by TheShockDoctors. 03/24/17 10:15 AM
fuse rejectors
by HotLine1. 03/24/17 07:53 AM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
231,675 Are you busy
166,587 Re: Forum
160,762 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 67 guests, and 10 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
#81393 - 08/07/02 02:03 PM "...likely to become energized..."  
jes  Offline
Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 103
CT
250.4 clearly states that electrical systems that are grounded shall be connected to earth in a manner that will limit the voltage imposed by lightning...
It then goes on to talk about grounding and bonding of electrical equipment and other conductive materials that are "likely to become energized".
At what point are the grounding and bonding requirements required to deal with lightning protection and not just ground faults within the electrical system?? For example, would a metal chimney extending up above the highest point of the structure require bonding?? Why or why not?? If so, how do you determine the size of the bonding conductor? Let's say the metal fireplace has a fan. #14 AWG circuit with equipment ground. Is that sufficient to withstand a lightning strike?
Just curious how others view the wording of 250.


2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides

#81394 - 08/07/02 03:10 PM Re: "...likely to become energized..."  
resqcapt19  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
IL
Lightning protection is covered by NFPA 780, the Lightning Protection Code. It is not really covered by the NEC.
Don


Don(resqcapt19)

#81395 - 08/07/02 09:33 PM Re: "...likely to become energized..."  
jes  Offline
Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 103
CT
Don,
I am well aware of 780, nevertheless, those words ARE in the NEC, have been for YEARS. What do they really mean? Do they apply only to lightning voltages coming from the utility or source of supply?


#81396 - 08/07/02 10:37 PM Re: "...likely to become energized..."  
resqcapt19  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
IL
In my opinion, the NEC in 250.4(A)(1) is talking about limiting the voltages on the electrical system that result from outside influences such as lightning. Note that it does use the word system in this section. The other parts of this section use the word "equipment" and for the most part also uses the words "fault clearing path". I don't see anything that requires lightning protection of the electrical equipment or other conductive equipment in the NEC.
Don


Don(resqcapt19)


Member Spotlight
renosteinke
renosteinke
Blue Collar Country
Posts: 5,316
Joined: January 2005
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.011s Queries: 14 (0.002s) Memory: 0.7579 MB (Peak: 0.8870 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-03-29 03:17:30 UTC