The Electrical Contractor Network

ECN Electrical Forum
Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Books, Tools and Test Equipment for Electrical and Construction Trades

Register Now!

Register Now!

We want your input!

Featured:
   

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

   
Recent Posts
Sprinklered equipment 26-008
by bigpapa
Yesterday at 04:24 PM
On Delay Relay with Auto Reset
by Potseal
12/01/16 09:59 AM
Wow, that was close!
by jraef
11/28/16 07:06 PM
Earthquake in New Zeeland
by RODALCO
11/27/16 11:25 PM
Calling all Non-US members!! (Non-US only)
by Tjia1981
11/27/16 06:33 AM
New in the Gallery:
12.5A through 0.75mm˛ flex (just out of curiosity)
Shout Box

Top Posters (30 Days)
gfretwell 14
HotLine1 10
Trumpy 8
Texas_Ranger 8
sparkyinak 7
Who's Online
0 registered (), 82 Guests and 4 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#81393 - 08/07/02 11:03 AM "...likely to become energized..."
jes Offline
Member

Registered: 07/12/02
Posts: 103
Loc: CT
250.4 clearly states that electrical systems that are grounded shall be connected to earth in a manner that will limit the voltage imposed by lightning...
It then goes on to talk about grounding and bonding of electrical equipment and other conductive materials that are "likely to become energized".
At what point are the grounding and bonding requirements required to deal with lightning protection and not just ground faults within the electrical system?? For example, would a metal chimney extending up above the highest point of the structure require bonding?? Why or why not?? If so, how do you determine the size of the bonding conductor? Let's say the metal fireplace has a fan. #14 AWG circuit with equipment ground. Is that sufficient to withstand a lightning strike?
Just curious how others view the wording of 250.

Top
2014 / 2011 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
#81394 - 08/07/02 12:10 PM Re: "...likely to become energized..."
resqcapt19 Offline
Member

Registered: 11/10/00
Posts: 2209
Loc: IL
Lightning protection is covered by NFPA 780, the Lightning Protection Code. It is not really covered by the NEC.
Don
_________________________
Don(resqcapt19)

Top
#81395 - 08/07/02 06:33 PM Re: "...likely to become energized..."
jes Offline
Member

Registered: 07/12/02
Posts: 103
Loc: CT
Don,
I am well aware of 780, nevertheless, those words ARE in the NEC, have been for YEARS. What do they really mean? Do they apply only to lightning voltages coming from the utility or source of supply?

Top
#81396 - 08/07/02 07:37 PM Re: "...likely to become energized..."
resqcapt19 Offline
Member

Registered: 11/10/00
Posts: 2209
Loc: IL
In my opinion, the NEC in 250.4(A)(1) is talking about limiting the voltages on the electrical system that result from outside influences such as lightning. Note that it does use the word system in this section. The other parts of this section use the word "equipment" and for the most part also uses the words "fault clearing path". I don't see anything that requires lightning protection of the electrical equipment or other conductive equipment in the NEC.
Don
_________________________
Don(resqcapt19)

Top



ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals