The Electrical Contractor Network

ECN Electrical Forum
Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Books, Tools and Test Equipment for Electrical and Construction Trades

Register Now!

Register Now!

We want your input!

Featured:
   

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

   
Recent Posts
Calling all Non-US members!! (Non-US only)
by aussie240
Yesterday at 02:39 AM
Photo Upload Tutorial
by DanK
12/06/16 11:35 PM
Sprinklered equipment 26-008
by bigpapa
12/02/16 04:24 PM
On Delay Relay with Auto Reset
by Potseal
12/01/16 09:59 AM
Wow, that was close!
by jraef
11/28/16 07:06 PM
New in the Gallery:
12.5A through 0.75mm˛ flex (just out of curiosity)
Shout Box

Top Posters (30 Days)
gfretwell 13
HotLine1 9
Texas_Ranger 8
sparkyinak 7
Trumpy 6
Who's Online
0 registered (), 218 Guests and 5 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 >
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#79242 - 12/10/01 10:56 PM Romex in pipe
aldav53 Offline
Member

Registered: 08/22/01
Posts: 547
Loc: Chandler, AZ USA
I can't see any reason why you can't run romex in emt even when using compression fittings? Seems safe to me.
_________________________
The Golden Rule - "The man with the gold makes the rule"

Top
2014 / 2011 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
#79243 - 12/11/01 03:01 AM Re: Romex in pipe
sparky Offline
Member

Registered: 10/18/00
Posts: 5545
To be compliant, the notes to chap 9 should be met. also compression insinuate wet/damp location, so the wire would have to follow suit.

Top
#79244 - 12/11/01 04:09 AM Re: Romex in pipe
Redsy Offline
Member

Registered: 03/28/01
Posts: 2138
Loc: Bucks County PA
I had an argument with the "Pro" at sell-all supply house. I maintain that if conduit is installed in a wet location, the interior or that conduit is a wet location, and wiring should be rated accordingly. He looked at me like I was from Mars, and insisted that the PVC conduit made it a dry location. Then he told me that he should know, because he is an electrician. (Don't ask me questions bud, just give me my UF)!!
BTW,
Also there may be other issues about complete raceway systems.

Top
#79245 - 12/11/01 03:13 PM Re: Romex in pipe
rkukl Offline
Member

Registered: 10/28/01
Posts: 43
Loc: Turners Falls,MA. USA
Its common practice in my area to see the following. “Appropriately” sized PVC buried to supply a separate building with the PVC stubbed into the basement with a fitting “male adapter” and sometimes a bushing and the same at the other end. Then to have SER cable pulled in and run to the panel and sub-panel in the out building. I think that this is ok, one reason is that the conductors in the SER are XHHW rated for wet locations. What do the rest of you think?

Top
#79246 - 12/11/01 04:45 PM Re: Romex in pipe
resqcapt19 Offline
Member

Registered: 11/10/00
Posts: 2209
Loc: IL
Redsy,
The new code makes it very clear that you can't use NM in an underground conduit.
"300.5(D)(5) Listing. Cables and insulated conductors installed in enclosures or raceways in underground locations shall be listed for use in wet locations."
Don(resqcapt19)
_________________________
Don(resqcapt19)

Top
#79247 - 12/11/01 10:44 PM Re: Romex in pipe
aldav53 Offline
Member

Registered: 08/22/01
Posts: 547
Loc: Chandler, AZ USA
Still seems like NM would be fine in conduit as long as it is a weatherproof installation. THHN wire is allowed so why not NM.
_________________________
The Golden Rule - "The man with the gold makes the rule"

Top
#79248 - 12/11/01 11:57 PM Re: Romex in pipe
Joe Tedesco Offline
Member

Registered: 10/07/00
Posts: 3325
Loc: Boston, Massachusetts USA
THHN is not permitted to be used in a wet location. See Table 310-13

[This message has been edited by Joe Tedesco (edited 12-24-2001).]
_________________________
Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant

Top
#79249 - 12/12/01 05:49 AM Re: Romex in pipe
Redsy Offline
Member

Registered: 03/28/01
Posts: 2138
Loc: Bucks County PA
Don,
My application was actually above ground, outdoors. I still say the interior is a wet location. I don't think the previous code was as clear on this. I often see NM run in PVC up the side of a house to get circuits in the attic for distribution throughout the second floor. I believe UF would be acceptable.

rkukl,
I would say that SER is not approved for underground use. Even in conduit. It may be debatable, especially now with the wording of 300.5 (D)(5), but I believe USE would have been be the proper method. See 338.2


[This message has been edited by Redsy (edited 12-12-2001).]

Top
#79250 - 12/12/01 06:38 AM Re: Romex in pipe
sparky66wv Offline
Member

Registered: 11/17/00
Posts: 2339
Loc: West Virginia
What about THHN with a THWN listing?

Or said another way... I've never seen THHN without a THWN listing...
_________________________
-Virgil
Residential/Commercial Inspector
5 Star Inspections
Member IAEI

Top
#79251 - 12/12/01 07:16 AM Re: Romex in pipe
aldav53 Offline
Member

Registered: 08/22/01
Posts: 547
Loc: Chandler, AZ USA
THHN is allowed underground in ridgid pipe wrapped with pipe wrap, isn't this considered damp or wet location?
_________________________
The Golden Rule - "The man with the gold makes the rule"

Top
Page 1 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 >



ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals